On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 04:55:11PM +, Tiago Zaniquelli wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
> I am trying to setup my notebook with fingerprint login but I didn't have
> success.
There is a related thread over at debian-project. It starts
here:
https://lists.debian.org/debia
On Sat, 06 Mar 2021 16:55:11 +
Tiago Zaniquelli wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
> I am trying to setup my notebook with fingerprint login but I didn't have
> success.
>
> The command lsbusb return this:
> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hu
Hello everybody.
I am trying to setup my notebook with fingerprint login but I didn't have
success.
The command lsbusb return this:
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0bda:565a Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
Integrated_Webcam_HD
Bus 001 D
https://www.addictivetips.com/ubuntu-linux-tips/enable-fingerprint-scanner-support-on-linux/
Renato Gallo
- Original Message -
From: rhkra...@gmail.com
To: "debian-user"
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 4:00:47 PM
Subject: Fingerprint recognition (on power button)
I am thin
Thanks!
On Monday, October 05, 2020 10:33:04 AM Chris Ramsden wrote:
> To cut to the chase, in my experience this gizmo won't work under Linux
> unless you vault through flaming hoops to make it do so. I strongly
> suspect that you won't know the capability is there and therefore you
> can safely
On 2020-10-05 15:00, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I am thinking about buying a:
KUU-K2 14.1" IPS Screen All Metal Shell Champagne Gold Office Notebook Intel
Celeron Processor J4115 8GB DDR4 RAM 256GB SSD Windows 10 Laptop Computer with
Fingerprint Unlock Backlit Keyboard
I am thinking about buying a:
KUU-K2 14.1" IPS Screen All Metal Shell Champagne Gold Office Notebook Intel
Celeron Processor J4115 8GB DDR4 RAM 256GB SSD Windows 10 Laptop Computer with
Fingerprint Unlock Backlit Keyboard
https://www.newegg.com/champagne-gold-kuu-k2-
workstation/p/1TS
> Yes. Given the data you've provided, I retract my first hunch: it seems
> your student is seeing a different host:
>
> - either DNS resolves to a different IP address -- then you'd see
>different IP addresses for your server as viewed from your student's
>workstation wrt the "rest of the
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 01:59:41PM -0300, Beco wrote:
> Thank you all so much for thid new batch of input Mick, LARAC, David, Tomas
> and Reco
> Bellow I'll try to answer in a brief way all at once:
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 00:34, mick crane wrote:
> > Is this Putty or something with k
a7:a8:a9:a0:a1:a2:a3:a4:a5:a6 (ED25519)
> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.05 seconds
>
> All wrong.
>
Very strange, could be a router in your network that NAT his connection
to the wrong server. Have you tried to scan other servers in your
network to look for the s
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 01:59:41PM -0300, Beco wrote:
> I mean the numbers are completely different.
> PUTTY: not only different, but it appears to get a ED25519 which is not on
> the server.
> SSH powershell: It gets ECDSA, which is the algorithm accepted, but a
> completely different hex code.
T
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 13:59, Beco wrote:
> I also asked him to bring his notebook to a neighbor to try to connect
> from there. We'll see his reply soon.
>
>
>
>
Update:
He went to his neighbor with his notebook in hand, tried there and he got
the correct fingerpri
: 5.1.19041.1
Bob's client 3: ubuntu from usb stick 20.04
Server is debian 10 buster
OpenSSH_7.9p1 Debian-10+deb10u2, OpenSSL 1.1.1d
> LARAC
> LARAC ends -
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 05:41, wrote:
> Lots of wild guessing and we still don't know the problem. There are
&g
Hi.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:40:35AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 06:28:29PM -0300, Beco wrote:
> > Dear linuxers,
> >
> > I've a server and one of my students is getting a wrong fingerprint when
> > trying to connect via SSH
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 06:28:29PM -0300, Beco wrote:
> Dear linuxers,
>
> I've a server and one of my students is getting a wrong fingerprint when
> trying to connect via SSH.
Lots of wild guessing and we still don't know the problem. There are
different fingerprints invo
of connect via ISP. It is not that
the port is blocking traffic.
The fingerprint appears, and if accepted the wrong one, the password is
asked for.
But then, of course, the connection fail.
First, disable Bob's account until later (see below).
Second, assess if your server(s) and/or netwo
via mobile.
And, somewhat "yes", student can kind of connect via ISP. It is not
that
the port is blocking traffic.
The fingerprint appears, and if accepted the wrong one, the password is
asked for.
But then, of course, the connection fail.
Also, he was able to connect the day
for the interest.
Yes, student can connect via mobile.
And, somewhat "yes", student can kind of connect via ISP. It is not that
the port is blocking traffic.
The fingerprint appears, and if accepted the wrong one, the password is
asked for.
But then, of course, the connection fail.
A
On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 18:46, Lucas Castro wrote:
>
> Check if he's really reaching the right server.
>
> ping the server from his computer and check with tcpdump on server side.
>
> If not reaching the server, try traceroute to track where is going on.
>
>
> Local address or Internet address add
On 2020-09-19 22:28, Beco wrote:
Dear linuxers,
I've a server and one of my students is getting a wrong fingerprint
when
trying to connect via SSH.
After a lot of debug, we are still unable to pinpoint why.
The server didn't change IP or keys, and other students still log in o
On 9/19/20 6:28 PM, Beco wrote:
Dear linuxers,
I've a server and one of my students is getting a wrong fingerprint
when trying to connect via SSH.
After a lot of debug, we are still unable to pinpoint why.
The server didn't change IP or keys, and other students still log in
o
Dear linuxers,
I've a server and one of my students is getting a wrong fingerprint when
trying to connect via SSH.
After a lot of debug, we are still unable to pinpoint why.
The server didn't change IP or keys, and other students still log in ok
with the correct fingerprint. Just o
On Fri 26 Jan 2018 at 08:30:43 (+), davidson wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, David Wright wrote:
>
> >The stretch version of scp displays fingerprints using a SHA256
> >hash, but of course a jessie machine has no idea of what its
> >fingerprint is except using an
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, David Wright wrote:
The stretch version of scp displays fingerprints using a SHA256
hash, but of course a jessie machine has no idea of what its
fingerprint is except using an MD5 hash. A question and suggestion:
Is there a way to get stretch scp to show the fingerprint in
The stretch version of scp displays fingerprints using a SHA256 hash,
but of course a jessie machine has no idea of what its fingerprint
is except using an MD5 hash. A question and suggestion:
Is there a way to get stretch scp to show the fingerprint in MD5
when connecting to a new (jessie) host
I think you answered your question.
On 06/03/17 16:11, Shahryar Afifi wrote:
> my Thinkpad x200 fingerprint reader 08ff:2810 AuthenTec AES2810 does not work
> under wheezy 7.11 . however under jessie it works because the libpam-fprintd
> from jessie is 0.5
> even when i instal
security source:
W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release:
Internal error: Good signature, but could not determine key
fingerprint?!
W: GPG error: http://mirror.ox.ac.uk wheezy Release: Internal error:
Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!
Digging
://security.debian.org wheezy/updates Release:
Internal error: Good signature, but could not determine key
fingerprint?!
W: GPG error: http://mirror.ox.ac.uk wheezy Release: Internal error:
Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!
What does
apt-get -o Debug::Acquire::gpgv=1 update
say
updates Release:
> Internal error: Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!
> W: GPG error: http://mirror.ox.ac.uk wheezy Release: Internal error:
> Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!
What does
apt-get -o Debug::Acquire::gpgv=1 update
say?
Ansgar
--
key
fingerprint?!
W: GPG error: http://mirror.ox.ac.uk wheezy Release: Internal error:
Good signature, but could not determine key fingerprint?!
Attempting to re-install gnupg and also debian-archive-keyring make no
difference. Trying a new mirror also makes no difference. Same error.
Anyone
Hello everybody,
Does anyone here know where can I download the driver for my fingerprint
ID 138a:0008 Validity Sensors, Inc. VFS300 Fingerprint Reader
I'm using debian wheezy and I didn't find the correct driver for it.
Dear gurus,
Any news on how to make this fingerprint read work as of today?
I read some old posts on internet, from dec/2012, and I hope we have
some good news now.
Is the procedure just:
# apt-get install fprint-demo libfprint-dev libfprint0 libpam-fprintd
And then enroll a finger with
with the fact that I can't establish a firm
> >> trust path to the CD signing key. Is there a canonical place to get
> >> the fingerprint of this key, so that at least one can have some
> >> confidence that the key one is validating with is at least the
> >>
eally uncomfortable with the fact that I can't establish a firm
> >> trust path to the CD signing key. Is there a canonical place to get
> >> the fingerprint of this key, so that at least one can have some
> >> confidence that the key one is validating with is at lea
to the CD signing key. Is there a canonical place to get
>> the fingerprint of this key, so that at least one can have some
>> confidence that the key one is validating with is at least the
>> widely-known (and generally accepted) one?
>>
>> As a hack, I've d
On 20110316_150153, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On 2011-03-16 14:31:14 Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> >My signing this email simply says that a person who has access to the
> >associated GPG private key wrote it.
>
> Actually, it doesn't even guarantee that they *wrote* it. It guarantees the
> *rea
On 2011-03-16 14:31:14 Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>My signing this email simply says that a person who has access to the
>associated GPG private key wrote it.
Actually, it doesn't even guarantee that they *wrote* it. It guarantees the
*read* it and were willing to sign it.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
onical place to get
> the fingerprint of this key, so that at least one can have some
> confidence that the key one is validating with is at least the
> widely-known (and generally accepted) one?
>
> As a hack, I've done this on an Ubuntu 10.10 system:
>
> gpg --recv-keys 6
I've recently downloaded the net installation image for Squeeze, but
am really uncomfortable with the fact that I can't establish a firm
trust path to the CD signing key. Is there a canonical place to get
the fingerprint of this key, so that at least one can have some
confidence that t
39 matches
Mail list logo
