I'm using debian testing/sid amd64+i386, fglrx-driver 15.7-3,
wine-development 1.7.51-1. Applications were run from 32-bit wine
prefix.
Hello. I tried installing fglrx driver for my Radeon HD 6850. It installed
and X.org ran properly. But when I try to run any windows application with
wine, it falls immediately givimg me the message:
[xcb] Extra reply data still left in queue
[xcb] This is most likely caused by a broken X
op 16-07-14 18:11, Dylan Bass schreef:
> I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie repos. Any
> reason why?
It does not work with the latest Xorg:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754249
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753781#88
With r
On 16/07/14 12:11 PM, Dylan Bass wrote:
I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie repos.
Any reason why?
The fglrx driver is closed source. AMD have to provide one for for each
version of X. If they haven't updated their driver, the Debian
maintainers can't
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:11:12 -0600
Dylan Bass wrote:
> I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie
> repos. Any reason why?
This is the way testing's working, re-read Debian docs.
--
the Lord doesn't touch many people nowadays…
priests take care
I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie repos. Any
reason why?
On 2013-10-05 18:49 +0200, Enrico Polesel wrote:
> I've just install debian jessie on a notebook and I'm not able to
> install fglrx-driver (there are only the legacy version)
>
> According to packages.debian.org[1] that packages is not longer
> available on jessie and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I've just install debian jessie on a notebook and I'm not able to
install fglrx-driver (there are only the legacy version)
According to packages.debian.org[1] that packages is not longer
available on jessie and I don't want
Hey,
I've been getting a new mouse recently, and it uses a hid driver that is only
available in linux 3.10.x. Obviously, this kernel is not supported under debian
as of now, but i thought that, as i was using the debian config file for 3.9.8,
it would be okay because i'd have all the correct driver
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> The open source drivers work better (in terms of integration with the X
> server) because the maintainers can adjust them to the latest changes in X
> and other graphic software. Unfortunately due to the problems noted above,
> they can't keep u
ately this driver doesn't allow me to play Heroes of MM V. I
tried to return to previous version of fglrx-driver(from
snapshots.debian.org repo), but didn't succeed in it because driver
depends on many packages including Xorg and so forth. I also tried
fglrx-legacy-driver from experimental repo
roes of MM V. I
tried to return to previous version of fglrx-driver(from
snapshots.debian.org repo), but didn't succeed in it because driver
depends on many packages including Xorg and so forth. I also tried
fglrx-legacy-driver from experimental repository, but it hangs my
system. Could you
Heroes of MM V. I
tried to return to previous version of fglrx-driver(from
snapshots.debian.org repo), but didn't succeed in it because driver
depends on many packages including Xorg and so forth. I also tried
fglrx-legacy-driver from experimental repository, but it hangs my
system. Could you
sn't allow me to play Heroes of MM V. I
>> tried to return to previous version of fglrx-driver(from
>> snapshots.debian.org repo), but didn't succeed in it because driver
>> depends on many packages including Xorg and so forth. I also tried
>> fglrx-legacy-driver
ping. But recently a real disaster
> had happened, ATI dropped a support of Radeon 4xxx cards and after
> update i was oblige to install a radeon driver instead of fglrx.
> Unfortunately this driver doesn't allow me to play Heroes of MM V. I
> tried to return to previous version of fgl
cards and after update i was oblige to
install a radeon driver instead of fglrx. Unfortunately this driver
doesn't allow me to play Heroes of MM V. I tried to return to previous
version of fglrx-driver(from snapshots.debian.org repo), but didn't
succeed in it because driver depe
freezing of the system. I have tried with old
Catalyst versions and same problems.
I would like to install the proprietary fglrx driver because I need to use
bi-GPU of this card with OpenCL. With the free radeon driver, I have no
problem for X but I don't have GPU support.
I also try with "
> Hi, folks!
>
> I'm Cesar, from Brazil. I've been using Debian Squeeze on my desktop:
> it has a ATI Technologies Inc M880G [Mobility Radeon HD 4200] so that
> fglrx-driver works perfectly. But, I'm gonna buy a brand new laptop HP
> Elitebook 8460w very soon
Hi, folks!
I'm Cesar, from Brazil. I've been using Debian Squeeze on my desktop:
it has a ATI Technologies Inc M880G [Mobility Radeon HD 4200] so that
fglrx-driver works perfectly. But, I'm gonna buy a brand new laptop HP
Elitebook 8460w very soon so that machine has a AMD FirePr
Hi, folks!
I'm Cesar, from Brazil. I've been using Debian Squeeze on my desktop:
it has a ATI Technologies Inc M880G [Mobility Radeon HD 4200] so that
fglrx-driver works perfectly. But, I'm gonna buy a brand new laptop HP
Elitebook 8460w very soon so that machine has a AMD FirePr
Hi Paul,
I faced the same problem of blinking cursor when using the below 3
different drivers :
fglrx-driver 1:12-6~beta-1
amd-driver-installer-12-4-x86.x86_64.run
amd-driver-installer-12-3-x86.x86_64.run
I then followed Issam's recommendation as below to workaround the issue and g
I'm using Debian Squeeze (new to linux) with the ATI fglrx-driver installed
along with pm-utils.
Sometimes, when my computer comes back up from suspend mode, it just hangs at
gdm login screen. When I kill the xsession (ctrl + alt + f1), it goes into
console mode. After login to console
[dropping CC to the bug, at least for now]
On Du, 04 dec 11, 23:24:48, lina wrote:
> Sincerely looking for advice about following error:
Hi Lina,
We are glad to help, but it is not easy to do so via e-mail. It is very
important that:
- you are patient :)
- you describe your problem as accuratel
On 2011-12-04, lina wrote:
> Sincerely looking for advice about following error:
>
> more Xorg.0.log | grep WW
>
UUOM
;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debi
tching Device section for instance
>> (BusID PCI:0@1:0:1) found
>> [ 16137.250] (WW) fglrx(0): board is an unknown third party board,
>> chipset is supported
>
>
> What Brand and model video card is this? What version of the propriatary
> driver? Does X actually load? c
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:24 AM, lina wrote:
Sincerely looking for advice about following error:
>
> more Xorg.0.log | grep WW
>
>(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
> [ 16136.164] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic" does not
> exist.
>
This one
Sincerely looking for advice about following error:
more Xorg.0.log | grep WW
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
[ 16136.164] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic" does not exist.
[ 16136.195] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fglrx
[ 16136
Hi,
> When I update this morning (wheezy one but with sid fglrx-driver), the
> xserver-xorg-core was updated.
>
> my fglrx-driver was removed,
>
> when I tried to install, it's reported:
>
> fglrx-driver depends on xorg-video-abi-10 or -8 or -6. which are not
&g
30/09/2011 05:33, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I update this morning (wheezy one but with sid fglrx-driver), the
> xserver-xorg-core was updated.
>
> my fglrx-driver was removed,
>
> when I tried to install, it's reported:
>
> fglrx-driver depends on xorg-vide
Hi,
When I update this morning (wheezy one but with sid fglrx-driver), the
xserver-xorg-core was updated.
my fglrx-driver was removed,
when I tried to install, it's reported:
fglrx-driver depends on xorg-video-abi-10 or -8 or -6. which are not
avaiable.
then I checked package
xserver
> Anyone have any idea why compiz won't work with newer fglrx drivers?
I don't. But I have use the `radeon' driver with compiz. Have you
tried it? It's better for your karma and won't suffer from those kinds
of problems you're experiencing.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
I upgraded my machine at work today, and among other things that were
installed, aptitude upgraded the kernel (linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64) as well
as the fglrx packages. I had the 9-11 held, but aptitude upgraded it anyway.
And with the combination of packages, I was no longer able to roll back to
ne is wrong, fglrx in Debian Squeeze need non-free packages in
/etc/apt/sources.list
ll they need is module-assistant and fglrx
r...@forest:~# aptitude install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-control
fglrx-source fglrx-kernel-2.6.32-3-amd64 module-assistant -y
r...@forest:~# module-assistant (and follow a
ed non-free packages in
/etc/apt/sources.list
ll they need is module-assistant and fglrx
r...@forest:~# aptitude install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-control
fglrx-source fglrx-kernel-2.6.32-3-amd64 module-assistant -y
r...@forest:~# module-assistant (and follow assistant, select fglrx,
make, build
Le 03/05/2010 11:43, Camaleón a écrit :
On Mon, 03 May 2010 01:48:02 -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems. Any
workaround I can do?
I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd 4550
card), but I just saw this bug
saying
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Zachary Uram wrote:
> This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems.
Agreed. Specifically, the fglrx driver. I don't have problems with nvidia,
but when fglrx-9-12 came out, it broke compiz, so I reinstalled 9-11, and
put it on hold. I
On Mon, 03 May 2010 01:48:02 -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
> This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems. Any
> workaround I can do?
>
> I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd 4550
> card), but I just saw this bug
> saying the packages
This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems. Any
workaround I can do?
I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd
4550 card), but I just saw this bug
saying the packages have been removed from testing due to a conflict
with the x.org transition.
The
On 2010-02-24 13:39 +0100, Zachary Uram wrote:
> I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd
> 4550 card), but I just saw this bug saying packages removed from
> testing:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=56
>
> So the packages refe
I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd
4550 card), but I just saw this bug saying packages removed from
testing:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=56
So the packages referred to here: http://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary
such as "fglrx-control
Matteo Riva skrev:
After yesterdays upgrade which contained new xserver packages, I can't
run the fglrx non-free driver anymore. I installed the latest version
with the sgfxi[1] script [...]
Are you aware that the fglrx driver was removed from squeeze on the 25th
to allow for the
After yesterdays upgrade which contained new xserver packages, I can't
run the fglrx non-free driver anymore. I installed the latest version
with the sgfxi[1] script but when xserver dies immediately with no
screens found and this error message
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so:
Hi all,
I'm sorry. I used xserver-xorg-driver-radeonhd and switched back to
fglrx-driver and can not reproduce my previous problem. I colose the
bug report now.
# aticonfig --install
Here my /etc/X11/xor.conf file (see attachment).
Greetings,
Raphael
xorg.conf.aticonfig.gz
Description
ised file found, configuring.
Segmentation fault
I have used that method successfully.
I do not remember ever getting a segmentation-fault from aticonfig.
I now run squeeze, but I believe it worked for me with lenny as well.
I no longer use the fglrx driver, so I have not tested anything now.
(My
I had been doing (installing & reinstalling) this more than 5 times, before
I reinstall my whole Debian Lenny, I would like to know if anyone ever get
pass this problem
# aticonfig --initial
Unable to open /etc/ati/control, please reinstall the driver.
Uninitialised file found, configuring.
Segmen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raphael Bossek schrieb:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521323
>
> Hi,
>
> if someone fight with ATI/fglrx-driver 9.10 and xserver-xorg 1:7.4+4
> (testing) should report this to bug 521323. DRI does
Version
+++--
ii fglrx-amdcccle 1:8-7-2
ii fglrx-atieventsd 1:8-7-2
ii fglrx-control1:8-7-2
un fglrx-control-qt2
un fglrx-control-qt3
ii fglrx-driver 1:
based on etch.
The card is brand new and it works at low resolution with the VESA X11
driver, so I guess it's not broken...
The fglrx driver in etch do not recognize the card (since it's too old): X
won't even start.
The fglrx driver in etch-backports recognizes the card and
> > I just tried it in my Thinkpad Z61M (Mobile X1400) and it seems to be
> > working well in 2D.
> >
> > Anthony
>
> I've switch from vesa to the radonhd driver and it worked instantly on
> my Z61p/FireGL5200.
> Although I cannot see a difference.
>
> Does anyone have success/experience with any d
Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 03 Dec 2007, Bruno Voigt wrote:
>
>> robin putters wrote:
>>
>>> Not yet, but work has started on 2D acceleration, and the driver is
>>> developing rapidly. In a couple of months(weeks?) time, you will have
>>> much better driver than vesa ever was, and probably
On 03 Dec 2007, Bruno Voigt wrote:
> robin putters wrote:
> > Not yet, but work has started on 2D acceleration, and the driver is
> > developing rapidly. In a couple of months(weeks?) time, you will have
> > much better driver than vesa ever was, and probably better in 2D than
> > fglrx. And you wi
robin putters wrote:
> Not yet, but work has started on 2D acceleration, and the driver is
> developing rapidly. In a couple of months(weeks?) time, you will have
> much better driver than vesa ever was, and probably better in 2D than
> fglrx. And you will be doing the radeonhd driver developers a
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Bruno Voigt wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
>> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
>>
>> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
>> which unfortunately doesn't work
Bruno Voigt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
>
> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
> which unfortunately doesn't work with linux kernel 2.6.23.x ..
>
> What is this ca
On 12/3/07, Bruno Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> robin putters wrote:
> > On 12/3/07, Bruno Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
> >> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
> >
robin putters wrote:
> On 12/3/07, Bruno Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
>> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
>>
>> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
>> which unfort
On 12/3/07, Bruno Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
>
> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
> which unfortunately doesn't work with linux kernel 2.6.23.x ..
>
Fi
Hi all,
the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
which unfortunately doesn't work with linux kernel 2.6.23.x ..
What is this cause, what can I do about it?
TIA,
Bruno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Jörg-Volker Peetz a écrit :
Romain JACQUET wrote:
When I try a "aptitude install fglrx-driver", aptitude claims that there
is no candidate version!
[...]
aptitude why fglrx-driver
No justification for fglrx-driver could be constructed.
This only tells you if fglrx
Romain JACQUET wrote:
> When I try a "aptitude install fglrx-driver", aptitude claims that there
> is no candidate version!
>
[...]
> aptitude why fglrx-driver
> No justification for fglrx-driver could be constructed.
This only tells you if fglrx-driver is a dependency o
When I try a "aptitude install fglrx-driver", aptitude claims that there
is no candidate version!
aptitude install fglrx-driver
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package stat
Kaloyan M. Penev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been having a ton of grief with my fglrx driver and the fact that
> it requires libstdc++5, so I was quite excited to see that a new driver is
> available. However, when I try to run their installer to build a debian
> package:
&g
Hi,
I have been having a ton of grief with my fglrx driver and the fact that
it requires libstdc++5, so I was quite excited to see that a new driver is
available. However, when I try to run their installer to build a debian
package:
sh ./ati-driver-installer-8.42.3-x86.x86_64.run --buildpkg
which packages replace fglrx-driver and fglrx-kernel-2.6.18-4-amd64 ?
None yet, but the latest xserver-xorg doesn't work with the fglrx
driver. Put your xserver-xorg package on hold before trying to
upgrade, and wait until AMD releases the new driver (or even better,
use the xserver-xorg-
Hello,
with unstable:
apt-get dist-upgrade says:
the following packages will be removed :
fglrx-driver fglrx-kernel-2.6.18-4-amd64
The new following packages wil be installed:
gawk libdirectfb-extra libhtml-parser-perl libhtml-tagset-perl
libhtml-tree-perl libnet-dbus-perl libpoppler-glib1
Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On my surprise, today I checked again and saw direct rendering is
> enabled. It looks like the problem was reaired in some recent kernel
> upgrade, but I didn't notice it yesterday, because two days ago I
> uninstalled libgl1-mesa-dri, because it was listed by deborphan.
On my surprise, today I checked again and saw direct rendering is
enabled. It looks like the problem was reaired in some recent kernel
upgrade, but I didn't notice it yesterday, because two days ago I
uninstalled libgl1-mesa-dri, because it was listed by deborphan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Scribit Marko Randjelovic dies 29/03/2007 hora 19:08:
> I run Etch on machine with Nvidia nForce3 250 motherboard and Radeon
> 9550 graphics card. DRI is not working neither with radeon, nor fglrx
> driver. I tried several versions of fglrx driver and kernel, Debian
> and vanilla.
On Thu March 29 2007 10:08, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> I run Etch on machine with Nvidia nForce3 250 motherboard and Radeon
> 9550 graphics card. DRI is not working neither with radeon, nor fglrx
> driver. I tried several versions of fglrx driver and kernel, Debian and
> vanilla.
>
I run Etch on machine with Nvidia nForce3 250 motherboard and Radeon
9550 graphics card. DRI is not working neither with radeon, nor fglrx
driver. I tried several versions of fglrx driver and kernel, Debian and
vanilla.
I think it's a bug and that probably is in kernel. I want to file
Hi guys,
On my notebook, HP nx6125 (ATI X300 graphics), if I use the included
radeon (oss) driver, I can ajust the screen brightness with the fn keys on
the keyboard, and if I unplug AC power, the screen dimms automatically.
But if I used the fglrx driver, this doesn't work correctly. It
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 14.01.2007 18:25:
> My original post was about Ati proprietary fglrx driver. Then Mathias
> proposed free radeon driver, but with it also no direct rendering.
Sorry I couldn’t help you anymore.
> Since
> this driver is free software, maybe I shoul
My original post was about Ati proprietary fglrx driver. Then Mathias
proposed free radeon driver, but with it also no direct rendering. Since
this driver is free software, maybe I should file a bug report about
this? My Etch system is fully upgraded.
I am not sure if it's a bug of
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Is this module loaded? If it is not, then adding it to /etc/modules
might be enough.
It is linked statically. Also, module radeon is loaded.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.18-3-amd64
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep CONFIG_AGP /boot/config-2.6.18-3-amd64
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AG
Why not use the fglrx package, It works fine on my Radeon 9600
Sjoerd
Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hello Marko.
>
> Marko Randjelovic, 03.01.2007 11:14:
>> Mathias Brodala wrote:
DESCRIPTION radeon is an Xorg driver for ATI RADEON based video
cards. It
contains […] hardware 3D ac
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 03.01.2007 11:14:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>>> DESCRIPTION radeon is an Xorg driver for ATI RADEON based video
>>> cards. It
>>> contains […] hardware 3D acceleration (experimental on R300 and R400
>>> series
>>> cards),
>>>
>>
>> (From the radeon manpage.
Mathias Brodala wrote:
The Gentoo is outdated then:
DESCRIPTION radeon is an Xorg driver for ATI RADEON based video cards. It
contains […] hardware 3D acceleration (experimental on R300 and R400 series
cards),
(From the radeon manpage.)
My Radeon 9600 has an RV350 chip.
And
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 02.01.2007 22:17:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> Could you try the radeon driver? I’m not much experienced with fglrx since
>> I haven’t used it for ages.
>>
>> What is the output of the following commands after you changed to radeon?
>>
>> $ lsmod | grep radeon $ l
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Could you try the radeon driver? I’m not much experienced with fglrx since I
haven’t used it for ages.
What is the output of the following commands after you changed to radeon?
$ lsmod | grep radeon
$ lsof /dev/dri/card0
Regards, Mathias
All right, but I am not sure if
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 02.01.2007 18:15:
>> Not sure about amd64, but Direct Rendering works with 9600 on my machine.
>> (Running i386.) Could you attach your /etc/X11/xorg.conf and
>> /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> I attached the files.
Could you try the radeon driver? I’m not much experienced w
X[B]
[9] -1 0 0xfc005000 - 0xfc005fff (0x1000) MX[B]
[10] -1 0 0xfc004000 - 0xfc004fff (0x1000) MX[B]
[11] -1 0 0xf800 - 0xf7ff (0x0) MX[B]O
[12] -1 0 0xfb01 - 0xfb01 (0x1) MX[B](B)
[13] -1 0 0xf000 - 0xf7ff (0x800) MX[B](B)
[14] -1 0 0xfb00 - 0xfb00fff
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 02.01.2007 16:57:
> With fglrx-driver package from debian, I didn't have direct rendering,
> and xv did not work, so I have downloaded
> ati-driver-installer-8.32.5-x86.x86_64.run from Ati site. However,
> building of Debian package fails
>
With fglrx-driver package from debian, I didn't have direct rendering,
and xv did not work, so I have downloaded
ati-driver-installer-8.32.5-x86.x86_64.run from Ati site. However,
building of Debian package fails
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# sh /ras/dld/ati-driver-installer-8.32.5-x86.x86_6
T wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:29:47 +0200, Christian Christmann wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to install the fglrx driver for my
>> ATI card on my Etch system with Xorg 7.
>
> me too, Etch system with Xorg 7.
>
>> After installing the packages
>> mod
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:29:47 +0200, Christian Christmann wrote:
> I'm trying to install the fglrx driver for my
> ATI card on my Etch system with Xorg 7.
me too, Etch system with Xorg 7.
> After installing the packages
> module-assistant, fglrx-driver and fglrx-kernel-
Hi,
I'm trying to install the fglrx driver for my
ATI card on my Etch system with Xorg 7.
After installing the packages
module-assistant, fglrx-driver and fglrx-kernel-src
and running 'aticonfig --initial' the fglrx driver
seem not to work:
notebook:/usr/lib# fglrxinfo
display:
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 the mental interface of
Roberto Sanchez told:
I am currently running 2.6.0-mm2, and have experienced some strange
behavior from XFree86. Basically, I had to install the ATI fglrx
driver to get decent performance in Neverwinter Nights (a Christmas
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 the mental interface of
Roberto Sanchez told:
> I am currently running 2.6.0-mm2, and have experienced some strange
> behavior from XFree86. Basically, I had to install the ATI fglrx
> driver to get decent performance in Neverwinter Nights (a Christmas
> gift
I am currently running 2.6.0-mm2, and have experienced some strange
behavior from XFree86. Basically, I had to install the ATI fglrx
driver to get decent performance in Neverwinter Nights (a Christmas
gift, w00t). My card is a Radeon 9000 Pro, and I am running X4.3 from
experimental.
The driver
89 matches
Mail list logo
