On Wed February 27 2008, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> > the other user USER_ owned the famd process.. but when I restarted it,
> > root owns it.
>
> I don't know about this particular issue, but I found famd to
> be a constant source of problems. Gamin is better, but not
&
-ef|grep kmail found her process, killed it. CTRL-ALT-F8 to get to her
> login, still locked up. nothing works. CTRL-ALT-F7 to get back to mine.
>
> # ps -ef|grep famd USER_ 4409 1 86 10:01 ?07:32:13
> /usr/sbin/famd -T 0
>
> /etc/init.d/fam restart
>
> everyth
found her process, killed it.
> CTRL-ALT-F8 to get to her login, still locked up. nothing works.
> CTRL-ALT-F7 to get back to mine.
>
> # ps -ef|grep famd
> USER_ 4409 1 86 10:01 ?07:32:13 /usr/sbin/famd -T 0
>
> /etc/init.d/fam restart
>
> eve
back to mine.
# ps -ef|grep famd
USER_ 4409 1 86 10:01 ?07:32:13 /usr/sbin/famd -T 0
/etc/init.d/fam restart
everything works fine again..
# ps -ef|grep famd
root 18821 1 0 18:42 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/famd -T 0
the other user USER_ owned the famd process.. but w
On Fri February 22 2008, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Yesterday, I was doing a lot of image editing using Gimp, web page editing
> with Quanta, and viewing the results in Iceweasel. Things started to get
> sluggish, and I noticed famd was sitting at 80% processor time. Restarted
> famd,
On 22 Feb at 4:37 Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu February 21 2008 19:32:09 Jamin Davis wrote:
> > Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > > I switched to the alt-F1 text login, and looked for processes running
> > > owned
On Thu February 21 2008 19:32:09 Jamin Davis wrote:
> Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > I switched to the alt-F1 text login, and looked for processes running
> > owned by me. All that I saw was famd.
> > I did a pkill famd, went back to my KDE login screen ( ctrl-alt-F7) ,
&
Paul Cartwright wrote:
I switched to the alt-F1 text login, and looked for processes running owned
by me. All that I saw was famd.
I did a pkill famd, went back to my KDE login screen ( ctrl-alt-F7) , put in
my password, and voila, I was logged in.
Is famd necessary? is famd causing this
y me. All that I saw was famd.
I did a pkill famd, went back to my KDE login screen ( ctrl-alt-F7) , put in
my password, and voila, I was logged in.
Is famd necessary? is famd causing this?
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On 4/14/07, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 21:10 +0800, Wei Chen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> >> After rebooting it again, I found famd still ran as me. Is famd supposed
> >>
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 21:10 +0800, Wei Chen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> >> After rebooting it again, I found famd still ran as me. Is famd supposed
> >> to behave like this? I never think a daemon that start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
>> After rebooting it again, I found famd still ran as me. Is famd supposed
>> to behave like this? I never think a daemon that starts from init script
>> should change itself to a normal user privilege. And a
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:37 +0800, Wei Chen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Wei Chen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just found that the famd process is now running with my user-id:
> >
> > [snip]
> > root 2987
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wei Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found that the famd process is now running with my user-id:
>
> [snip]
> root 2987 0.0 0.1 4924 848 ?Ss Apr12 0:00
> /usr/sbin/sshd
> root 2993 0.0 0.1 7044
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just found that the famd process is now running with my user-id:
[snip]
root 2987 0.0 0.1 4924 848 ?Ss Apr12 0:00
/usr/sbin/sshd
root 2993 0.0 0.1 7044 776 ?Ss Apr12 0:00
/usr/sbin/winbindd
root
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 11:24:34PM -0300, Felipe Sateler
wrote:
> AFAIK fam uses inotify (or dnotify, I don't recall which)
> when available.
It would appear that "dnotify" appears in the FAM source but
"inotify" does not.
Looking at (and trying to remember) how dnotify works, it
would seem it ho
Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 08:51:46AM +0200, user local wrote:
>> ... or, if you want to umount/eject (right click on
>> gnome/KDE desktop/panel icon), you will get an error
>> message... checking w/ lsof you will find that the lone
>> thing that locks the mount point is the fam
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 08:51:46AM +0200, user local wrote:
> ... or, if you want to umount/eject (right click on
> gnome/KDE desktop/panel icon), you will get an error
> message... checking w/ lsof you will find that the lone
> thing that locks the mount point is the fam daemon. :D
Yup: that'd be
2006/12/5, Seeker5528 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
KDE and Gnome both use it and since it provides notification for
file system changes it serves a useful function. For example if you have
Amarok or Rhythmbox open and from another application or from the
command line copy a song into your music director
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:34:50 -0500
Matthew Krauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get a larger list - see below. Also, that list includes Gamin, which
> actually conflicts with fam. In fact, I'm confused. If I try to install
> fam, it tries to rip out a lot of Gnome stuff, and some other thing
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:34:50PM -0500, Matthew Krauss wrote:
> charles norwood wrote:
> >On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:18 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:18:02PM -0800, charles norwood wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi list.
charles norwood wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:18 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:18:02PM -0800, charles norwood wrote:
Hi list.
What applications use famd?
man -k famd
famd (8) - The File Alteration Monitor (FAM) daemon
Thanks,
Chuck
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:18 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:18:02PM -0800, charles norwood wrote:
> > Hi list.
> > What applications use famd?
> > man -k famd
> > famd (8) - The File Alteration Monitor (FAM) daemon
> > T
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:18:02PM -0800, charles norwood wrote:
> Hi list.
> What applications use famd?
> man -k famd
> famd (8) - The File Alteration Monitor (FAM) daemon
> Thanks,
> Chuck
$ apt-cache rdepends fam
fam
Reverse Depends:
stopmotion
gamin
d
Hi list.
What applications use famd?
man -k famd
famd (8) - The File Alteration Monitor (FAM) daemon
Thanks,
Chuck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Michael - I normally just restart it using
# /etc/init.d/fam restart
but I was wondering why it was happening.
Good to hear that someone else has the same experience - I guess it must
be a bug in famd?
Thanks,
Yasir
Hello Yasir!
I've got a current version of Etch and
Hello Yasir!
> I've got a current version of Etch and I've noticed that every day (around
> evening time) famd
> starts using up lots of CPU time (e.g. 95%, according to top) and it does
> this for a long time.
>
> Is this normal? What's it doing?
I do not
I've got a current version of Etch and I've noticed that every day
(around evening time) famd starts using up lots of CPU time (e.g. 95%,
according to top) and it does this for a long time.
Is this normal? What's it doing?
Thanks,
Yasir
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if famd (the file alteration monitor, which is
installed standard (?) by Debian Sarge) interfere with PostgreSQL?
I am having major problems with the performance of PostgreSQL on my
machine...
Since it updated recently, I have noticed famd
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:14:40PM +0100, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if famd (the file alteration monitor, which is
> installed standard (?) by Debian Sarge) interfere with PostgreSQL?
>
> I am having major problems with the performance of PostgreS
Hi,
Does anyone know if famd (the file alteration monitor, which is
installed standard (?) by Debian Sarge) interfere with PostgreSQL?
I am having major problems with the performance of PostgreSQL on my
machine...
--
Groeten,
Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 15:17, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Vi, even then it might just not be noticed. I am thinking that you are
> not clear as to what FAMD just is.
>
> ---
> Description: File Alteration Monitor
> FAM monitors files and directories, notifying inter
> >
> > Famd on my system sometimes hogged all my CPU time and system
> > monitor shows
> > it takes about 99% of the cycles.
> >
I've seen this too, now I use gamin on sid as an alternative to fam and I don't
have this problem anymore.
also, that'
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 14:39 -0500, Vi Arguelles wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2005 05:46, Saverio Trioni wrote:
> >
> > Hi. I have the same problem. I don't dare to kill famd but it runs as
> > my user. I think it should run as root...
Saverio, if it ran as root for
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 05:46, Saverio Trioni wrote:
>
> Hi. I have the same problem. I don't dare to kill famd but it runs as
> my user. I think it should run as root...
>
Mmm, I did it once. I didn't kill it kill it. I just restarted the daemon and
all was well. I had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saverio Trioni wrote:
> I just observed it happens when I open big documents with evince. Does
> it happen to you also? Maybe it's a bug in Evince and should be filed.
I don't use Evince (anyway, what's this?) and had encountered that bug
one or two
El 25/07/2005, a las 11:27, phyrster escribió:
Hi Debianers,
Famd on my system sometimes hogged all my CPU time and system
monitor shows
it takes about 99% of the cycles.
I just observed it happens when I open big documents with evince.
Does it happen to you also? Maybe it's a b
El 25/07/2005, a las 11:27, phyrster escribió:
Hi Debianers,
Famd on my system sometimes hogged all my CPU time and system
monitor shows
it takes about 99% of the cycles.
My system configuration is Sarge (mixed with Sid) on an Athlon Tbird.
What has caused this problem and how to pin it
Hi Debianers,
Famd on my system sometimes hogged all my CPU time and system monitor shows
it takes about 99% of the cycles.
My system configuration is Sarge (mixed with Sid) on an Athlon Tbird.
What has caused this problem and how to pin it down?
regards
bxuef
--
dhammapada says
the mount point is not showing in konqueror, and no
> > files are opened on the share by any other application.
> >
> > In fact, the only way I've found to unmount the files is to
> >
> > $ su root
> > $ umount -l /mount/point
> >
> > When I used
>
en the mount point is not showing in konqueror, and no files
> are opened on the share by any other application.
>
> In fact, the only way I've found to unmount the files is to
>
> $ su root
> $ umount -l /mount/point
>
> When I used
> $ lsof | grep /mount/point
>
&g
re by any other application.
In fact, the only way I've found to unmount the files is to
$ su root
$ umount -l /mount/point
When I used
$ lsof | grep /mount/point
I found that famd has the mount point open/engaged. Kill famd and I can
unmount the share. But then famd is kinda useful.
Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just noticed that famd is eating (almost) 100% CPU, before that I
> didn't even know such a thing existed. Anybody has any ideas why would
> it go crazy?
No, but I just removed famd and everything worked as before.
On Friday 27 August 2004 09:59, Erik Steffl wrote:
>I just noticed that famd is eating (almost) 100% CPU, before that I
> didn't even know such a thing existed. Anybody has any ideas why would
> it go crazy?
>
> top says:
>
>PID USER PR NI VIRT RE
I just noticed that famd is eating (almost) 100% CPU, before that I
didn't even know such a thing existed. Anybody has any ideas why would
it go crazy?
top says:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
19629 erik 25 0 3616 1364 2572 R 87.4 0.2 510:
According to the reponses to the article below, you may not need famd
anymore. I removed mine and haven't noticed any problems.
See responses to this message:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2004/debian-kde-200401/msg00253.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
* Michael Satterwhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:03:12:21:12:20-0600] scribed:
> Debian sarge...
>
> My computer has slowed to a crawl, can't even start konqueror. When I look at
> the processes, famd is using about 73% of the system.
>
> Anyone know what might b
Debian sarge...
Same thing with Sid.
My computer has slowed to a crawl, can't even start konqueror. When I look at
the processes, famd is using about 73% of the system.
Anyone know what might be wrong?
Don't know. Wish I did.
I restart it: su -c "/etc/init.d/fam restart"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Debian sarge...
My computer has slowed to a crawl, can't even start konqueror. When I look at
the processes, famd is using about 73% of the system.
Anyone know what might be wrong?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE
Le Vendredi 5 Septembre 2003 22:54, Stefan Waidele jun. a déclamé :
> > I can't umount a SD card from my drive, famd uses it.
> Fam monitors files & directories for changes.
> I guess that some application told fam to watch /mnt/carte and
> a) did not tell fam to stop watc
Christophe Courtois wrote:
I can't umount a SD card from my drive, famd uses it.
I don't really know what is this famd,
Fam monitors files & directories for changes.
I guess that some application told fam to watch /mnt/carte and
a) did not tell fam to stop watching when it fin
I can't umount a SD card from my drive, famd uses it.
I don't really know what is this famd, I d'ont really understand its goal
in the man page, and uninstalling it would be a bit harsh. "Sync" does
not help. I haven't found anything useful on Google.
I had the s
52 matches
Mail list logo
