On Sunday, 25.09.2005 at 15:34 -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
> > Well, yes: but that applies regardless of whether you've launching
> > it from procmail or not :-)
>
> Well, not exactly. I don't know enough about Exim to know if it can
> operate this way, but if you do your AV/content filtering dur
> From: Dave Ewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 10:18 AM
<...>
> Well, yes: but that applies regardless of whether you've launching it
> from procmail or not :-)
Well, not exactly. I don't know enough about Exim to know if it can operate
this way, but if you do y
On Saturday, 24.09.2005 at 12:10 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Dave Ewart wrote:
> > Note that you can always trigger, say, clamav and
> > spamassassin from procmail instead, still allowing you to use the
> > 'light' version.
>
> With the caveat that one should do so intelligently. IE, either d
Dave Ewart wrote:
> Note that you can always trigger, say, clamav and
> spamassassin from procmail instead, still allowing you to use the
> 'light' version.
With the caveat that one should do so intelligently. IE, either deliver
or dump, never bounce.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'
On Monday, 19.09.2005 at 23:40 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 19 September 2005 11:36 pm, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> > Would someone know the différence between light and heavy for this
> > package?
>
> Light is for easy stuff that requires just the most common stuff,
> whereas heav
On Monday 19 September 2005 11:36 pm, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> Would someone know the différence between light and heavy for this
> package?
Light is for easy stuff that requires just the most common stuff, whereas
heavy is a complete install of exim, as I understand it.
> I have the lig
Hi,
Would someone know the différence between light and heavy for this
package?
I have the light one installed, but want to do virtual hosting.
--
Administration & Formation à l'administration
de serveurs dédiés:
http://www.google.fr/search?q=aspo+infogerance+serveur
7 matches
Mail list logo