On Monday, 19.09.2005 at 23:40 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Monday 19 September 2005 11:36 pm, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > > Would someone know the différence between light and heavy for this > > package? > > Light is for easy stuff that requires just the most common stuff, > whereas heavy is a complete install of exim, as I understand it. > > > I have the light one installed, but want to do virtual hosting. > > You're probably in need of the heavy one.
You don't need the 'heavy' version for virtual hosting: it's what I use and I'm using the 'light' version. According to "apt-cache show exim4-daemon-heavy": "In addition to the features already supported by exim4-daemon-light, the extended features include LDAP, PostgreSQL and MySQL data lookups, SASL and SPA SMTP authentication, embedded Perl interpreter, and exiscan-acl for integration of virus-scanners and spamassassin." So, if you want 'clever' authentication, use the 'heavy' version; also, if you want to integrate virus- and spam-scanning directly into the MTA, you'll need 'heavy'. Note that you can always trigger, say, clamav and spamassassin from procmail instead, still allowing you to use the 'light' version. Dave. -- Please don't CC me on list messages! ... Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/ Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature