Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/15/2009 4:36 AM:
> On Mon December 14 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> The devil is in the details. If your home broadband ISP is going to
>> host your DNS, you _must_ inform your domain registrar, Netsol in this
>> case, of your new DNS servers' and their IP addresses
On Mon December 14 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> The devil is in the details. If your home broadband ISP is going to
> host your DNS, you _must_ inform your domain registrar, Netsol in this
> case, of your new DNS servers' and their IP addresses. Then you must
> explicitly tell your broadband ISP
On Mon December 14 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Your DNS service appears to be provided by this outfit below. You would
> contact this outfit to change your MX records. My guess is that there
> is a ton of reselling and partnering going on here behind the scenes,
> and you may not have any clue w
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/14/2009 7:39 PM:
> I asked my ISP, and the response I got tells me they can take care of all the
> MX records, and those kinds of things. Yet, I agree, there is lots more to
> it. Not the smallest of which is S P @ M containment. Going from a hosting
> service th
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/14/2009 7:44 AM:
> if I dropped my domain hosting company, you are saying I would go back to
> network Solutions to get my MX records done? or my ISP...
Not unless Netsol was/is providing your DNS. It doesn't appear to be
the case:
Registrant:
Paul B Cartwright
On Mon December 14 2009, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> From previous posts, I thought you already had an internet mail server
> running at a colo facility, or a VPS server running an internet mail
> server, and thus the basic prerequisite experience to setup another
> internet mail server. Now, from you
Paul Cartwright put forth on 12/14/2009 6:11 AM:
> On Mon December 14 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> If you run your mail on a dynamic IP you will probably find
>> many sites rejecting it -- it may be listed in a PBL such as
>> http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/ (either now, or in the future).
>> I'd recomm
On Mon December 14 2009, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > if I dropped my domain hosting company, you are saying I would go back to
> > network Solutions to get my MX records done? or my ISP...
>
> Presumably Network Solutions.
>
> I have Freeparking.co.uk look after my domains, and they provide me with
>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:27:25PM +, Alan Chandler
wrote:
> Normally when you get a domain name, you should get the
> facility to edit the name servers zone file for the
> domain. You then point the MX records where you like -
> just point it/them at this same static ip.
Just to be picky, yo
Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon December 14 2009, Alan Chandler wrote:
Normally when you get a domain name, you should get the facility to edit
the name servers zone file for the domain. You then point the MX
records where you like - just point it/them at this same static ip.
I've had my domain
On Mon December 14 2009, Alan Chandler wrote:
> Normally when you get a domain name, you should get the facility to edit
> the name servers zone file for the domain. You then point the MX
> records where you like - just point it/them at this same static ip.
I've had my domain for quite a few
Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon December 14 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
If you run your mail on a dynamic IP you will probably find
many sites rejecting it -- it may be listed in a PBL such as
http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/ (either now, or in the future).
I'd recommend relaying your outbound email via
On Mon December 14 2009, Jon Dowland wrote:
> If you run your mail on a dynamic IP you will probably find
> many sites rejecting it -- it may be listed in a PBL such as
> http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/ (either now, or in the future).
> I'd recommend relaying your outbound email via either your
> ISPs
13 matches
Mail list logo
