On Friday, February 02, 2001 at 09:55:30 (+0400), Rino Mardo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:46:05PM -0800 or thereabouts, brian moore wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:02:19PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
>>> i didn't get any address spoofing. hmm...
>>> here's the headers i see -- ('h' in m
On 02/02/2001 at 13:21 +, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> As I understand it, I think the 'exim oddity' only works if exim is the
> first to see your mail (ie you have your own domain). In your case, gmx
> would have been the first to see your mail, and was most likely what
> changed it.
>
I am using S
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 09:55:30AM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:46:05PM -0800 or thereabouts, brian moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:02:19PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > > i didn't get any address spoofing. hmm...
> > > here's the headers i see -- ('h' in mutt
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:46:05PM -0800 or thereabouts, brian moore wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:02:19PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > i didn't get any address spoofing. hmm...
> > here's the headers i see -- ('h' in mutt)
>
> Yes, you're seeing an 'exim oddity' :)
>
> > From: "Love
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:02:19PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> i didn't get any address spoofing. hmm...
> here's the headers i see -- ('h' in mutt)
Yes, you're seeing an 'exim oddity' :)
> From: "Lovely Johny"
On most smtp servers, the above address would change. SMTP insists that
the
i didn't get any address spoofing. hmm...
here's the headers i see -- ('h' in mutt)
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 16:52:18 -0600
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([216.234.231.6])
by s
6 matches
Mail list logo