On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:46:05PM -0800 or thereabouts, brian moore wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:02:19PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > i didn't get any address spoofing. hmm...
> > here's the headers i see -- ('h' in mutt)
>
> Yes, you're seeing an 'exim oddity' :)
>
> > From: "Lovely Johny" <John Lenon>
>
> On most smtp servers, the above address would change. SMTP insists that
> the addresses be fully qualified, and sendmail and postfix (dunno about
> qmail) will both canonicalize the address to themselves.oddity? i'm using exim and look at this: From: "Lovely Johny" <John [EMAIL PROTECTED]> or could it be that will is using a diff version of exim? mine is Version: 3.12-10 -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+ Key fingerprint = 9DE1 5825 77B4 FF45 7485 D3EB DCCF DE48 09B6 4426 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+ Who's watching the watchmen?
pgptSwCLVdIfM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
