Re: g++ (egcs) and g++272

On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 08:01:37 -0600, Robert Kerr wrote: > can g++ (the egcs version) and g++272 coexist successfully? No; the library packages they need conflict. g++272 was a crude hack to allow package maintainers a backdoor for compiling old code. > I'm using a slink system, and think tha

g++ (egcs) and g++272

Hi all, can g++ (the egcs version) and g++272 coexist successfully? I'm using a slink system, and think that I need to back up the g++272 compiler for a legacy app, but don't want to mess anything up with my current happy egcs g++ compiler. -- -bob An optimist says the glass is half full, a pe

Re: egcs and g++

On Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 10:33:44PM -0700, Robert Kerr wrote: generic.h : have a look at: `/usr/include/byteorder/generic.h` eventually this is the Header You need ? Another generic.h is in `/usr/X11R6/include/xview/generic.h` but I assume You don't need them for convert software to linux libg+

egcs and g++

Well, here's the situation. I'm trying to port a package to Linux which, unfortunately, depends a great deal on generic.h and stuff that only comes in the libg++ package. But, I'm also using the egcs compiler, which doesn't include libg++. From the egcs home page I've found some information on p