songbird wrote:
>
> as an FYI, last night this wasn't a good idea:
>
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>gir1.2-matepanelapplet-4.0 (1.27.1-2+b2 => 1.27.1-3)
>libmate-panel-applet-4-1 (1.27.1-2+b2 => 1.27.1-3)
>libmate-panel-applet-dev (1.27.1-2+b2 => 1.27.1-3)
>mate-panel
as an FYI, last night this wasn't a good idea:
The following packages will be upgraded:
gir1.2-matepanelapplet-4.0 (1.27.1-2+b2 => 1.27.1-3)
libmate-panel-applet-4-1 (1.27.1-2+b2 => 1.27.1-3)
libmate-panel-applet-dev (1.27.1-2+b2 => 1.27.1-3)
mate-panel (1.27.1-2+b2 => 1.27.1-3)
On divendres, 1 de març de 2019 10:45:48 CET Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 01.03.2019 13:27, Felix Rubio wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have mix stable+testing (~1200 packages from stable, ~20
> > packages from testing). I have the following contents in
> > /etc/apt/preferences.d/pinning:
>
Il 01/03/19 11:18, Alexander V. Makartsev ha scritto:
This is something you have to decide for yourself and deal with
unforeseen consequences. If you actually *build* packages from
"stable" on "testing" system, using dependencies for building also
from "testing" then it should be ok compatibil
ith apt list --upgradable, and I get only those that will be upgraded.
> However, when I run apt upgrade, I get a number of packages that will be
> downgraded. How can I prevent this downgrading from happening?
here are magic levels for the numbers in the priority field.
They are explained, at len
On 01.03.2019 15:07, Andrea Borgia wrote:
>
> Il giorno ven 1 mar 2019 alle ore 10:46 Alexander V. Makartsev
> mailto:avbe...@gmail.com>> ha scritto:
>
> On 01.03.2019 13:27, Felix Rubio wrote:
>> I have mix stable+testing (~1200 packages from stable, ~20
>> packages from testing).
On 3/1/2019 11:07 AM, Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Il giorno ven 1 mar 2019 alle ore 10:46 Alexander V. Makartsev <
> avbe...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> On 01.03.2019 13:27, Felix Rubio wrote:
>>
>> I have mix stable+testing (~1200 packages from stable, ~20 packages
>> from testing). I have the foll
Il giorno ven 1 mar 2019 alle ore 10:46 Alexander V. Makartsev <
avbe...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On 01.03.2019 13:27, Felix Rubio wrote:
>
> I have mix stable+testing (~1200 packages from stable, ~20 packages
> from testing). I have the following contents in
> /etc/apt/preferences.d/pinning:
On 01.03.2019 13:27, Felix Rubio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have mix stable+testing (~1200 packages from stable, ~20
> packages from testing). I have the following contents in
> /etc/apt/preferences.d/pinning:
>
This is something you should not do in first place. [1]
The right and safe way to run s
will be
downgraded. How can I prevent this downgrading from happening?
Thank you!
Felix
On Sunday, 11 June 2017 20:06:48 CEST Brian wrote:
> if you change your sources.list to use a suitable
> one from snapshot.debian.org it will be found.
I didn't know that, thanks!
ecause you were asking how to do it with apt
>
> Yes, I see, and in fact apt would be my preferred tool, if downgrading were
> possible with it.
The incentive to invetigate the suggestion above is probably minimal
because you have solved your issue.
--
Brian.
On 11-06-2017 05:06, solitone wrote:
> But where do you find old packages in case you no longer
> have them in /var/cache/apt/archives?
http://snapshot.debian.org/
--
A rolling disk gathers no MOS.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
oesn't find that.
> I've suggested it only because you were asking how to do it with apt
Yes, I see, and in fact apt would be my preferred tool, if downgrading were
possible with it.
Thanks!
UTC Time: June 11, 2017 7:39 AM
From: lisi.re...@gmail.com
On Sunday 11 June 2017 08:16:11 Fungi4All wrote:
> Below please find Lisi's answer on whether packages should be reverted or
> not.
!! There is nothing there - not surprising since I have never passed an
opinion on any such thing. Does th
On 11-06-17, solitone wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 June 2017 08:39:25 CEST Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > please, Solitone, let me and the list know what I am supposed to have said.
>
> No Lisi, I don't have more info than the list regarding what you supposedly
> said on this
> topic :-)
>
> In any case, I'
On Sunday, 11 June 2017 08:39:25 CEST Lisi Reisz wrote:
> please, Solitone, let me and the list know what I am supposed to have said.
No Lisi, I don't have more info than the list regarding what you supposedly
said on this
topic :-)
In any case, I've just removed the hold on the 4 chromium pa
On Sunday 11 June 2017 08:16:11 Fungi4All wrote:
> Below please find Lisi's answer on whether packages should be reverted or
> not.
!! There is nothing there - not surprising since I have never passed an
opinion on any such thing. Does the version that went directly to solitone
have a complete
With all the confusion on reply reply-all I has send her/him this
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 10:06 AM
From: fungil...@protonmail.com
To: solitone
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 9:55 AM
From: solit...@mail.com
On Saturday, 10 June 2017 05:45:22 CEST Fungi4All wrote:
> apt
>
> Hold a package:
> sudo apt-ma
d thanks for your reply. I'm under Plasma Desktop, so I don't
> have synaptic--I use KDE's Discover. Although I use it only for automatic
> updates. For installing/removing packages, as well as setting a package on
> hold, I use apt. I'd rather use apt for downgradi
Hi,
I made best progress by using aptitude. However, you have to look at the
dependencies yourself.
How to handle:
- Start aptitude with ncurses gui.
- Mark the required to the former available version.
- Look at the dependencies, you my have to set the dependend libs also to
former versions
On 10-06-17, solitone wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 June 2017 05:45:22 CEST Fungi4All wrote:
> > apt
> >
> > Hold a package:
> > sudo apt-mark hold
> >
> > Remove the hold:
> > sudo apt-mark unhold
>
> That's ok. I can then:
> $ sudo apt upgrade
> to upgrade that package to the latest available v
--- Begin Message ---
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 9:55 AM
From: solit...@mail.com
On Saturday, 10 June 2017 05:45:22 CEST Fungi4All wrote:
> apt
>
> Hold a package:
> sudo apt-mark hold
>
> Remove the hold:
> sudo apt-mark unhold
That's ok. I can then:
$ sudo apt upgrade
to upgrade that package to
On Saturday, 10 June 2017 05:45:22 CEST Fungi4All wrote:
> apt
>
> Hold a package:
> sudo apt-mark hold
>
> Remove the hold:
> sudo apt-mark unhold
That's ok. I can then:
$ sudo apt upgrade
to upgrade that package to the latest available version.
But my question was: once I've upgrated it,
c--I use KDE's Discover. Although I use it only for automatic updates.
For installing/removing packages, as well as setting a package on hold, I use
apt. I'd rather use apt for downgrading as well.
dpkg
Put a package on hold:
echo " hold" | sudo dpkg --set-selections
Remove t
for automatic updates.
For installing/removing packages, as well as setting a package on hold, I use
apt. I'd rather use apt for downgrading as well.
Cheers!
On 06/09/2017 09:44 PM, solitone wrote:
I am on Debian 9 (scratch), and I have a MacBook Pro 12,1 with retina display.
Few days ago I upgraded Google Chrome from version 58 to 59:
google-chrome-stable:amd64 (58.0.3029.110-1, 59.0.3071.86-1)
This new version no longer supports HiDPI. As a result
I am on Debian 9 (scratch), and I have a MacBook Pro 12,1 with retina display.
Few days ago I upgraded Google Chrome from version 58 to 59:
google-chrome-stable:amd64 (58.0.3029.110-1, 59.0.3071.86-1)
This new version no longer supports HiDPI. As a result everything in Chrome is
so small that I w
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 24 Apr 2015 at 12:37:36 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
>
>> I try to keep my system as close to 100% stable as possible. In spite
>> of this, a version of libp11-kit0 that is ahead of stable "somehow"
>> snuck into my system:
>>
>> $ apt-cache
n goes like this:
>
> emacs24-lucid depends on libgnutls-deb0-28 (>= 3.3.0) depends on
> libp11-kit0 (>= 0.20.7)
There you go! It wasn't "somehow". It was installed as an explicit
installation by you when you installed it from backports. Everything
makes perfect sen
On Fri 24 Apr 2015 at 18:50:30 +0100, Brian wrote:
> Bug makes interesting reading; especially when it contains
#764982 in case anyone was wondering, :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
On Fri 24 Apr 2015 at 12:37:36 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote:
> I try to keep my system as close to 100% stable as possible. In spite
> of this, a version of libp11-kit0 that is ahead of stable "somehow"
> snuck into my system:
>
> $ apt-cache policy libp11-kit0
> libp11-kit0:
> Installe
0
> 500 http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian/ stable/main amd64 Packages
> 500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stable/main amd64 Packages
>...
> How can I downgrade this libp11-kit0?
The usual way is to specify the explicit version number.
apt-get install libp11-kit0=0.12-3
Up
I try to keep my system as close to 100% stable as possible. In spite
of this, a version of libp11-kit0 that is ahead of stable "somehow"
snuck into my system:
$ apt-cache policy libp11-kit0
libp11-kit0:
Installed: 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1
Candidate: 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1
Version tab
Le 16.06.2014 20:54, Linux-Fan a écrit :
On 06/16/2014 03:42 PM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Hello.
I made some virtual computers with my desktop computer, which runs a
(
mostly ) Debian testing. Now, I have noticed that even with
virtualbox's
backports, the computer on which I wan
On 06/16/2014 03:42 PM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I made some virtual computers with my desktop computer, which runs a (
> mostly ) Debian testing. Now, I have noticed that even with virtualbox's
> backports, the computer on which I want to finally use them ( I was too
> la
Hello.
I made some virtual computers with my desktop computer, which runs a (
mostly ) Debian testing. Now, I have noticed that even with virtualbox's
backports, the computer on which I want to finally use them ( I was too
lazy to want to learn how to correctly create VMs from command-line ) i
tried enabling wheezy repos (I'm on jessie/testing),
> but it still only gives me the horrible new version.
>
> Thanks for any help you can give!
Instead of downgrading, try Geeqie instead. That's what I did when
gthumb was "improved." It's not as versatile as gthu
On 23/03/14 05:24 PM, quixote wrote:
*How* did you do the downgrade? I downloaded gthumb_3.2.6-1_amd64.deb,
tried to install with gdebi, and got the error message:
Dependency is not satisfiable: gthumb-data (= 3:3.2.6-1)
So I downloaded that, put it in the same dir, and got the same error
messa
*How* did you do the downgrade? I downloaded gthumb_3.2.6-1_amd64.deb,
tried to install with gdebi, and got the error message:
Dependency is not satisfiable: gthumb-data (= 3:3.2.6-1)
So I downloaded that, put it in the same dir, and got the same error
message.
The new interface is the absol
On 08/03/14 02:02 PM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 13:52:23 -0500
Frank McCormick wrote:
I would like to downgrade Gthumb to the previous version before
the interface was changed. I am running Sid.
I've looked around but the only version available seems to
be the current one 3.3.1
P
Hi.
On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 13:52:23 -0500
Frank McCormick wrote:
> I would like to downgrade Gthumb to the previous version before
> the interface was changed. I am running Sid.
> I've looked around but the only version available seems to
> be the current one 3.3.1
Please choose one of those:
ht
I would like to downgrade Gthumb to the previous version before
the interface was changed. I am running Sid.
I've looked around but the only version available seems to
be the current one 3.3.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
can't for the life of me think, which exact command to use.
>
> No. That operation is not supported. It would be almost impossible
> to test all of the cases. And the need for doing so is much rarer.
> Upgrading is a task that everyone needs, at least for security
> upgra
Hello Andrei!
Thanks, I'l definitely consider it. Much better than to go back. :-)
Knd regards
Julien
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Such Is Life: Very Intensely Adorable;
Free And Jubilating Amazement Revels, Dancing On - FLOWERS!
== Find my music at ==
http://juliencod
On Vi, 03 feb 12, 19:28:57, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> It is still a long time until Wheezy releases. There is no indicate
> one way or the other about whether gnome-orca will be in wheezy or
> not. It is too early to tell. I think you should be patient and wait
> and see. A lot can happen in a yea
Hi bob!
I'm sorry, I see, that I wrote rather without context, besides I expressed
myself unclearly.
Yes, we are talking about Gnome-Orca. Why do I "have to upgrade"? The new
Orca version has a lot of fixes for problems, which are there in the old
version. These fixes will allow to use much
Julien Claassen wrote:
> So let's talk about Orca. :-)
Orca as in gnome-orca the screen reader?
> I found, that Orca is no longer available in wheezy and an
> installation of Squeeze's GNOME+Orca reulted in a lot of problems,
> which I could understand before.
Yes, problems. I don't know about
Hello!
Thanks bob and Aidan!
OK, I do understand now, why downgrading wouldn't be possible.
So let's talk about Orca. :-) I found, that Orca is no longer available in
wheezy and an installation of Squeeze's GNOME+Orca reulted in a lot of
problems, which I could understan
ost impossible
to test all of the cases. And the need for doing so is much rarer.
Upgrading is a task that everyone needs, at least for security
upgrades. But downgrading is uncommon.
An individual project package might downgrade just fine. But taking
the entire system back would be very
I seem to remember asking this on IRC a while ago, and the answer I got
(from multiple people) was to backup system config files and, of course,
/home, and do a fresh install of stable. (In the end, I went with this
method.)
I am quite certain that downgrading from testing to stable is not
Hello everyone!
I just wondered, if it would be possible to downgrade my Debian distro from
- say - Wheezy to Squeeze? I thought, that it must work, but I can't for the
life of me think, which exact command to use.
Thanks for any help!
Warm regards
Julien
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Thursday 04 August 2011 03:52:49 pm Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:46:44 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> > Short answer: Because when you are running ./configure and see a
> > message saying "Package xyz was not found in the pkg-config search
> > path", it usually means (in Debian) th
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:46:44 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:33:49 -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
>
>> Eduardo,
>>
>> Thanks, that worked perfectly, but, how did you know that, especially
>> so quickly?
>>
>> Randy Kramer
>>
>> On Thursday 04 August 2011 08:52:24 am Eduardo M K
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:33:49 -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> Eduardo,
>
> Thanks, that worked perfectly, but, how did you know that, especially so
> quickly?
>
> Randy Kramer
>
> On Thursday 04 August 2011 08:52:24 am Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>> On Qui, 04 Ago 2011, Randy Kramer wrote:
>> > Yes
Eduardo,
Thanks, that worked perfectly, but, how did you know that, especially so
quickly?
Randy Kramer
On Thursday 04 August 2011 08:52:24 am Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Qui, 04 Ago 2011, Randy Kramer wrote:
> > Yesterday, my build started failing with messages like this:
> >
> > "Packag
On Qui, 04 Ago 2011, Randy Kramer wrote:
Yesterday, my build started failing with messages like this:
"Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'gtk+-2.0' fou
To get to the point quicker, skip over the "Background:" down to "My
question / problem:"
Background:
I'm not really a C or C++ programmer, but I've been working on a program
(well, an addition to an existing program--a lexer for Scintilla for
the Foswiki/ TWiki markup language) and "limping a
On 04/12/2011 03:32 PM, Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:03:36 -0400
Johan Kullstam wrote:
Apologies for following up to myself, but I thought I should say that
when I added /run myself the 2.6.38 kernel booted without problems.
So... is this udev167-1 safe to upgrade to on Wheezy
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:03:36 -0400
Johan Kullstam wrote:
>>>Apologies for following up to myself, but I thought I should say that
>>>when I added /run myself the 2.6.38 kernel booted without problems.
>>
>> So... is this udev167-1 safe to upgrade to on Wheezy (base-files 6.1), or
>> should I w
Andrej Kacian writes:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:44:17 +0100
> Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
>>On 08 Apr 2011, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>>>
>>> After an upgrade today to base-files 6.3 I rashly assume things would be
>>> fixed, but not so. My /run is no longer there but now the 2.6.38 kernels
>>> won't
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:44:17 +0100
Anthony Campbell wrote:
>On 08 Apr 2011, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>>
>> After an upgrade today to base-files 6.3 I rashly assume things would be
>> fixed, but not so. My /run is no longer there but now the 2.6.38 kernels
>> won't boot - they stop at the nouveau d
On 08 Apr 2011, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> After an upgrade today to base-files 6.3 I rashly assume things would be
> fixed, but not so. My /run is no longer there but now the 2.6.38 kernels
> won't boot - they stop at the nouveau driver. Luckily I still had a
> 2.6.37 kernel which isn't affected
On 06 Apr 2011, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> A Dimecres 06 Abril 2011 16:30:08, Wolodja Wentland va escriure:
> > I assume that you are actually trying to fix a different bug, namely one
> > introduced by the premature installation of base-files 6.2 which created
> > the /run directory. The fastest
n.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
> > >
> > > Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
> >
> > http://snapshot.debian.org/package/udev/166-1/
> >
> > Note that downgrading base-files (which removes /run) will
> > also do the same
A Dimecres 06 Abril 2011 16:30:08, Wolodja Wentland va escriure:
> I assume that you are actually trying to fix a different bug, namely one
> introduced by the premature installation of base-files 6.2 which created
> the /run directory. The fastest fix is probably to just remove /run and be
> done
ad the previous 166 version?
>
> http://snapshot.debian.org/package/udev/166-1/
>
> Note that downgrading base-files (which removes /run) will
> also do the same job:
>
> http://snapshot.debian.org/package/base-files/6.1/
Just downgrading base-files to 6.1 did unfortunately
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 16:13 +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> Last Udev version have an important error:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
>
> Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
You can get them from: http://snapshot.debian.org/package/udev/166-1/
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 04:20:24PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-04-06 16:13 +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
>
> > Last Udev version have an important error:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
> >
> > Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
>
> On
/
Note that downgrading base-files (which removes /run) will
also do the same job:
http://snapshot.debian.org/package/base-files/6.1/
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' P
On 2011-04-06 16:13 +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> Last Udev version have an important error:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
>
> Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
On snapshot.debian.org. Alternatively, you can rm -rf /run and restart
udev.
Sv
Last Udev version have an important error:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621087
Where can I find and download the previous 166 version?
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
On Tuesday 16 of November 2010 22:31:20 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <201011161438.54964.jesus.nava...@undominio.net>, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> >Downgrade shouldn't be considered as an "upgrade, only to a lower version"
>
> That is what a downgrade is, by definition.
In my case, this whoul
In <201011161438.54964.jesus.nava...@undominio.net>, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
>Hi, Boyd:
>
>On Monday 15 November 2010 20:55:58 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In <201011151334.06503.lukas.linh...@centrumholdings.com>, Lukas Linhart
>
>[...]
>
>> Downgrades aren't supported and can't reasonably be
Hi, Boyd:
On Monday 15 November 2010 20:55:58 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <201011151334.06503.lukas.linh...@centrumholdings.com>, Lukas Linhart
[...]
> Downgrades aren't supported and can't reasonably be supported in general.
> Specifically, it is impossible to modify the lower-versioned p
> Then I'm afraid you'll receive more advice in "debian-devel" :-)
Oh, I'll perhaps try. Thanks.
> I find the concept interesting.
> First, because I was not aware that a metapackage could be "itself" up/
> downgraded :-?
"metapackage"is usial package, not virtual package.
> Second, because if
In <201011151334.06503.lukas.linh...@centrumholdings.com>, Lukas Linhart
wrote:
>Problem is, we'd like to be able to downgrade. However. I did not found the
>option to "force download in dependency chain"; when metapackage is being
>downgraded, all dependencies forced to download must be specified
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:34:06 +0100, Lukas Linhart wrote:
> we're building packages with concept of "metapackage": package whose
> only purpose is to specify particular versions it depends on.
Then I'm afraid you'll receive more advice in "debian-devel" :-)
> Problem is, we'd like to be able to d
systematic testing or requirement that they operate
correctly on downgrades. Some do and some don't.
For example packages may convert configuration files forward from old
formats to new formats. But I don't know of any that convert new
formats to old formats when downgrading.
Therefore apt an
Hi,
we're building packages with concept of "metapackage": package whose only
purpose is to specify particular versions it depends on.
Problem is, we'd like to be able to downgrade. However. I did not found the
option to "force download in dependency chain"; when metapackage is being
downgrade
Matteo Riva schrieb:
> Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
>
> How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
> driver was working fine?
> What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
> versions?
>
>
Hi all!
I have two questions reg
Matteo Riva schrieb:
> Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
>
> How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
> driver was working fine?
> What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
> versions?
>
>
Hi all!
I have two questions reg
Matteo Riva wrote:
Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
driver was working fine?
What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
versions?
1.7 is a major headache for me:
http://bugs.debi
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:25 +0100, Matteo Riva wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:40 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
>
> Thanks! I had looked at the log but I guess I missed the error line
> mentioning dri module not being loaded do to an error.
>
> Installing the firmware-linux package
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:40 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> A good starting point would be to look at your /var/log/Xorg.0.log for
> errors (EE) and warnings (WW). Nowadays X his supposed to handle dri or
> compositing alone, but sometime it helps to show him the way. On the
> contrary by
Matteo Riva wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Wolodja Wentland
> wrote:
>
>> I use the radeonhd driver and am very happy with its performance. I ran
>> into the same behaviour you described some time ago and fixed it by using EXA
>> as acceleration method. The applicable part from my xor
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Wolodja Wentland
wrote:
> I use the radeonhd driver and am very happy with its performance. I ran
> into the same behaviour you described some time ago and fixed it by using EXA
> as acceleration method. The applicable part from my xorg.conf is:
>
> --- snip ---
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:04 +0100, Matteo Riva wrote:
> 2010/1/30 Johan Grönqvist :
> > Have you tried both the radeon and the radeonhd
> Yes I have tried both drivers and couldn't see any appreciable
> difference.
I use the radeonhd driver and am very happy with its performance. I ran
into th
2010/1/30 Johan Grönqvist :
> Have you tried both the radeon and the radeonhd
> drivers? As I understand it, they should be similar in feature set, but I
> had issues (slow scrolling, among others) with the radeon driver that I do
> not experience with the radeonhd driver.
Yes I have tried both
Matteo Riva skrev:
Yes I am using the free driver now but the performance is poor. Actually
I get a strange behavior:
Have you tried both the radeon and the radeonhd
drivers? As I understand it, they should be similar in feature set,
but I had issues (slow scrolling, among others) with the
e a new driver, maybe this one will finally catch
> up with xorg and kernel development (for now...).
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NzkzMQ
I hope it will be a fast release. I know that downgrading can be a real
pain, and I honestly don't even know where to find
Stefaan Himpe wrote:
>
>> I found snapshot.debian.net but it seems its last update was on 2008 or
>> am I looking in the wrong place
> Sorry I should have checked before pointing you there.
> Make sure to backup any important files (like configuration stuff in /etc)
> before you start to fiddle wi
I found snapshot.debian.net but it seems its last update was on 2008 or
am I looking in the wrong place
Sorry I should have checked before pointing you there.
Make sure to backup any important files (like configuration stuff in /etc)
before you start to fiddle with these things.
Disclaimer: I'
tem (until I did a dist-upgrade when the nvidia driver was fixed).
>
> For downgrading, I simply used the previous version of the packages, as
> found in my /var/cache/apt/archives folder.
>
> If you cannot find the packages there, you can try to search them via
> http://snaps
downgrading, I simply used the previous version of the packages, as
found in my /var/cache/apt/archives folder.
If you cannot find the packages there, you can try to search them via
http://snapshot.debian.net/
hth,
Stefaan.
What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
On Friday 29 January 2010 09:51:02 Matteo Riva wrote:
> Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
>
> How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
> driver was working fine?
> What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
> versions?
Packag
Squeeze upgrade broke fglrx driver with the new xserver.
How can I downgrade the xserver from 1.7.4 back to 1.6.5 when fglrx
driver was working fine?
What packages do I need to downgrade, and where can I find those
versions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:31:10AM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri,24.Oct.08, 17:33:01, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > > these previous package =EF=AC=81les locally in /var/cache/apt/archives/ or
> > > remotely at http:
> > > //snapshot.debian.net/. See also
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri,24.Oct.08, 17:33:01, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > these previous package =EF=AC=81les locally in /var/cache/apt/archives/ or
> > remotely at http:
> > //snapshot.debian.net/. See also 'Rescue using dpkg' on page 12.
>
> Does anybody else see ligatures
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 4:24 AM, T o n g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:33:45 -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>
>>> I was experiencing with an unstable package, now I'd like to
>>> downgrade this package...
>
>>> $ apt-cache policy nfs-common
>>> nfs-common:
>>> Installed:
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
