On Fri 24 Apr 2015 at 12:37:36 -0400, Kynn Jones wrote: > I try to keep my system as close to 100% stable as possible. In spite > of this, a version of libp11-kit0 that is ahead of stable "somehow" > snuck into my system: > > $ apt-cache policy libp11-kit0 > libp11-kit0: > Installed: 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1 > Candidate: 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1 > Version table: > *** 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1 0 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 0.12-3 0 > 500 http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian/ stable/main amd64 Packages > 500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stable/main amd64 Packages
libp11-kit0 wasn't installed by mistake and didn't sneak onto your system uninvited. Backports will pull in packages and versions of packages which are not in a stable release. Bug makes interesting reading; especially when it contains > In my opinion it's very good when backports is default in sources.list. My opinion is that I don't want to push ticking time bombs into the hands of our users. And that's exactly what defaulting to enabling backports was. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150424175030.go22...@copernicus.demon.co.uk
