On 5 Aug 2024 23:51 -0500, from deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk (David Wright):
> Possibly because people aren't warned against using it unless they're
> on a network that is already using it for Microsoft servers. It would
> be simple to add such a warning to the screen below, and perhaps some
> advice o
On Sat 03 Aug 2024 at 12:59:45 (+), Andy Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 06:40:32PM +1000, George at Clug wrote:
> > I believe ICCAN are moving to possibly replacing .local, .home, .lan,
> > .corp, .mail, .localdomain, (and possibly others) with .internal ?
>
> home.arpa was defined by
George at Clug wrote:
> It is not iptables anymore, it is nftables. It is not 'reboot' or 'shutdown
> -r now' it is 'systemctl reboot', it is not syslog it is journalctl.
iptables still exists, and it calls nftables to do the work
underneath.
If you are using systemd, it's systemctl reboot,
On Sunday 04 August 2024 09:54:07 am George at Clug wrote:
>
>
> I have been traumatised by things changing. Just when I think I know
> something, someone goes and changes it.
>
Yeah, I keep seeing things changed to something new, and wonder why the heck
I need that...
--
Member of the to
On 5 Aug 2024 00:34 +1000, from c...@goproject.info (George at Clug):
>> Standards don't tend to be abolished unless there's a good reason.
>> There wasn't a standard before home.arpa. Since 2013 it's been "use
>> your own globally unique registered domain, or else use home.arpa".
The RFC specifyi
On 4 Aug 2024 14:35 +0100, from j...@jretrading.com (Joe):
> Exactly. I've run a DHCP server since about 2010, and used one of my
> own domain names in my network since 2006.
Using a domain name that you control has never been problematic. Or,
well, for as long as DNS has been a thing at least (pr
On Monday, 05-08-2024 at 00:19 Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 11:54:07PM +1000, George at Clug wrote:
> > On Sunday, 04-08-2024 at 22:59 Andy Smith wrote:
> > > So I want to emphasise again that while standards are useful so
> > > we're all on the same page, in this particu
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 11:54:07PM +1000, George at Clug wrote:
> On Sunday, 04-08-2024 at 22:59 Andy Smith wrote:
> > So I want to emphasise again that while standards are useful so
> > we're all on the same page, in this particular case it's not a big
> > deal, likely nothing terribly bad is
On Sunday, 04-08-2024 at 22:59 Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:08:55PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > On 8/3/24 09:00, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > > If you use .local for other things it can interfere with mDNS but
> > > > picking almost anything else has very few repe
On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 12:59:55 +
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:08:55PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > On 8/3/24 09:00, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > > If you use .local for other things it can interfere with mDNS
> > > > but picking almost anything else has very few
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:08:55PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On 8/3/24 09:00, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > If you use .local for other things it can interfere with mDNS but
> > > picking almost anything else has very few repercussions (unless you
> > > are very silly about it), so I don't
On 8/3/24 18:09, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 04:10:33PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/3/24 09:00, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
[Very interesting Stuff snipped about ICANN and domain suffixes]
If you use .local for other things it can interfere with mDNS but
picking almost a
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 04:10:33PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/3/24 09:00, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
[Very interesting Stuff snipped about ICANN and domain suffixes]
> >
> > If you use .local for other things it can interfere with mDNS but
> > picking almost anything else has very few
On 3 Aug 2024 22:22 +0100, from mick.cr...@gmail.com (mick.crane):
> I was going to change everything yet again to home.arpa but now it might be
> .internal?
To use .home.arpa is absolutely fine if you don't need (or want)
globally unique names. It has been properly assigned specifically for
"non-
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:22:43PM +0100, mick.crane wrote:
> Initially the advice was .home. Then I think BT started using that on mobile
> network.
> Then they said use .local. then they said use .home.
I don't recall anything about .home being recommended, but yeah
Microsoft did suggest .l
On 2024-08-03 19:57, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 3 Aug 2024 12:59 +, from a...@strugglers.net (Andy Smith):
I believe ICCAN are moving to possibly replacing .local, .home, .lan,
.corp, .mail, .localdomain, (and possibly others) with .internal ?
home.arpa was defined by IANA in 2018. If they
On 8/3/24 09:00, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 06:40:32PM +1000, George at Clug wrote:
I believe ICCAN are moving to possibly replacing .local, .home, .lan,
.corp, .mail, .localdomain, (and possibly others) with .internal ?
home.arpa was defined by IANA in 2018. If they go ahe
On 3 Aug 2024 12:59 +, from a...@strugglers.net (Andy Smith):
>> I believe ICCAN are moving to possibly replacing .local, .home, .lan,
>> .corp, .mail, .localdomain, (and possibly others) with .internal ?
>
> home.arpa was defined by IANA in 2018. If they go ahead with
> .internal then I can o
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 06:40:32PM +1000, George at Clug wrote:
> I believe ICCAN are moving to possibly replacing .local, .home, .lan,
> .corp, .mail, .localdomain, (and possibly others) with .internal ?
home.arpa was defined by IANA in 2018. If they go ahead with
.internal then I can only i
On 3/8/24 16:40, George at Clug wrote:
I believe ICCAN are moving to possibly replacing .local, .home, .lan,
.corp, .mail, .localdomain, (and possibly others) with .internal ?
I read the ICANN documents you referenced but did not see the proposal
was to replace those domains? It is more off
I believe ICCAN are moving to possibly replacing .local, .home, .lan,
.corp, .mail, .localdomain, (and possibly others) with .internal ?
How could this affect mDNS and the use of .local?
https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-top-level-domain-string-for-private-use-24-01-20
21 matches
Mail list logo
