On 8/30/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:25:31AM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
The problem with changing upstream code is it is not a one-shot
deal. Changes must be investigated and applied every time a new
version comes out, which means someone has to keep track o
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:25:31AM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
> The problem with changing upstream code is it is not a one-shot
> deal. Changes must be investigated and applied every time a new
> version comes out, which means someone has to keep track of the
> changes which were done, and see
Does the daemon allow dropping privileges? If not, then it will bot be able to
bind to a port below 1024.
This option does not seem to be available in dhcpd
Cheers
Iain
Andrew Wood wrote:
>On 28/08/13 01:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>> Reading through the bug report, it look
On 8/29/2013 8:24 AM, Andrew Wood wrote:
On 28/08/13 01:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Reading through the bug report, it looks like upstream didn't accept
it. Debian stays as close as possible to upstream, for good reason.
I agree its good to keep things as close as possible to upstream, but
unles
On 28/08/13 01:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Reading through the bug report, it looks like upstream didn't accept
it. Debian stays as close as possible to upstream, for good reason.
I agree its good to keep things as close as possible to upstream, but
unless upstream can present some compelling ar
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 08:13:43PM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 8/27/2013 5:26 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
> >Why does dhcpd (installed from isc-dhcp-server package in WHeezy) run as
> >root not a less privileged user?
> >
> >The only reference to this subject I can fi
On 8/27/2013 5:26 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why does dhcpd (installed from isc-dhcp-server package in WHeezy) run as
root not a less privileged user?
The only reference to this subject I can find is this bug report first
filed in 2005 and seemingly still not fixed...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Why does dhcpd (installed from isc-dhcp-server package in WHeezy) run as
root not a less privileged user?
The only reference to this subject I can find is this bug report first
filed in 2005 and seemingly still not fixed...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308832
Surely
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis
wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 07:51 AM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis
>> wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I have an OT question about the always-broadcast option
On 10/11/2012 07:51 AM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis
> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I have an OT question about the always-broadcast option of the dhcpd server.
>>
>> Based on the Wikipedia article, all DHCP messa
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have an OT question about the always-broadcast option of the dhcpd server.
>
> Based on the Wikipedia article, all DHCP messages to the client are sent
> to the broadcast address. This makes sense, sinc
Hey,
I have an OT question about the always-broadcast option of the dhcpd server.
Based on the Wikipedia article, all DHCP messages to the client are sent
to the broadcast address. This makes sense, since the UDP protocol used
by DHCP runs on top of the IP protocol, and the client does not have
--- b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: urp...@linuxwaves.com
Subject: Re: dhcpd tftp boot server configuration
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:36:20 -0600
In <20110225224107.36ea4...@resin06.mta.everyone.net>, urp
In <20110225224107.36ea4...@resin06.mta.everyone.net>, urpion urpion wrote:
>Hello! I need
[...]
>declaration?here's what I got in
>/etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf## Sample
>configuration file for ISC dhcpd for
>Debian### The
I can't understand you through the HTML. Also, it
r-name the host name of the server? And am I defining the client host name in the host declaration?here's what I got in /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf## Sample configuration file for ISC dhcpd for Debian### The ddns-updates-style parameter controls whether or not the server will# attempt to do a DNS up
Steve Kemp wrote:
On Wed May 27, 2009 at 21:21:07 +0200, pch0317 wrote:
Can I use two "range" entry in dhcpd.conf?
What happened when you tried it?
or can I use two "range" in "pool" bracket?
What happened when you tried it?
Seriously the time it takes to test this
On Wed May 27, 2009 at 21:21:07 +0200, pch0317 wrote:
> Can I use two "range" entry in dhcpd.conf?
What happened when you tried it?
> or can I use two "range" in "pool" bracket?
What happened when you tried it?
Seriously the time it takes to test this
has got to be less than the time it
Hello
Can I use two "range" entry in dhcpd.conf?
For example:
-
ddns-update-style none;
option domain-name "dom.org";
option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.2, 192.168.0.3;
default-lease-time 4;
max-lease-t
Hi,
I want to add to my dhcp server config the equivalent of the windows option
in option 252: we put the address of the file wpad (web proxy
autodiscovry protocole) to get address of proxy.
Therefore the client (firefox , ..) can auto detect the proxy info (address
and port).
thanks for h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/08 10:39, Forsaken wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:17:16 -0400
> Forsaken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nevermind, I'm just being retarded. Here's the guilty culprit right
> here:
>
>> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>> r
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:17:16 -0400
Forsaken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nevermind, I'm just being retarded. Here's the guilty culprit right
here:
> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range 192.168.2.100 192.168.3.200;
Looked over it ten times and didn't see it until *after* I sp
cast-address 192.168.2.255;
> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> option domain-name-servers 192.168.3.7;
> }
>
> Whenever I try to start dhcpd, I get the following:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/dhcp3# /etc/init.d/dhcp3-server start
> dhcpd self-test failed. Please fix t
Vlan1: 192.168.2.0/24
Vlan2: 192.168.3.0/24
The switch has a trunk line to the router, which has subinterfaces
setup to do intervlan routing. The individual ports for each vlan are
restricted to that vlan.
Vlan1 are my workstations, Vlan2 are my servers. I've setup dhcpd on a
server in Vlan2. It ha
a fixed ip address. The server does
> > not respect that entry and gives the IP address to another host with a
> > different MAC address. I don't quite understand why it, dhcpd, should do
> > that. Is normal behavior?
> >
>
> OPPS, the messag
ed ip address. The server does
> > not respect that entry and gives the IP address to another host with a
> > different MAC address. I don't quite understand why it, dhcpd, should do
> > that. Is normal behavior?
> >
>
> OPPS, the message left before I could paste
C address. I don't quite understand why it, dhcpd, should do
> that. Is normal behavior?
>
OPPS, the message left before I could paste snippets of the conf file.
dhcpd.conf -- # #
Global Options pid-file-name "/var/run/dhcpd
I have an entry in my dhcp3 dhcpd.conf which says that host xyz with certain
MAC address should receive a fixed ip address. The server does not respect
that entry and gives the IP address to another host with a different MAC
address. I don't quite understand why it, dhcpd, should do tha
On 6/12/05, LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!I'm using a dhcp3 client with resolvconf configuration. The ip updating andname server configuration works fine, but I can not use the /etc/hosts file.For example if I set this up in /etc/hosts:
192.168.0.1server.example.org server
That's ok The
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 02:30:28 AM +0200, LeVA wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using a dhcp3 client with resolvconf configuration. The ip updating and
> name server configuration works fine, but I can not use the /etc/hosts file.
> For example if I set this up in /etc/hosts:
Do you have the following in y
Hi!
I'm using a dhcp3 client with resolvconf configuration. The ip updating and
name server configuration works fine, but I can not use the /etc/hosts file.
For example if I set this up in /etc/hosts:
192.168.0.1server.example.org server
Then typing 'host server` will end up with the erro
iam having trouble setting up a dhcp range i had it
working then when i restarted the box without changing
anything, i get a message saying dhcpd failed to start
check syslog. in syslog the only errors i found were
cant find lwresd.conf but the program lwresd is
installed is this file obsolete? do
On Monday 10 May 2004 09:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was just wondering if there is any way to know all the IP addresses
> curently assigned by my dhcpd server (with associated MAC addresses)?
If you are using the ISC dhcpd server, try the
file /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases. Note that s
Hi all,
I was just wondering if there is any way to know all the IP addresses curently
assigned by my dhcpd server (with associated MAC addresses)?
Aurel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. I'll give it a try.
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Adam Aube wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2004 07:57 pm, Peter Quackenbush wrote:
> > First, I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list.
>
> Since your question is a general DHCP client question, this list is the
> right place.
>
> > Is there
On Monday 16 February 2004 08:45 pm, Brett Carrington wrote:
> The problem is that it requires configuration on EVERY SINGLE cluster
> machine. It's not really optimal if you want a real netboot kind of
> cluster. The OP is trying to do something DHCP wasn't designed to do.
Yes, it does require co
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:38:53PM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2004 07:57 pm, Peter Quackenbush wrote:
> > First, I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list.
>
> Since your question is a general DHCP client question, this list is the
> right place.
>
> > Is there some c
On Monday 16 February 2004 07:57 pm, Peter Quackenbush wrote:
> First, I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list.
Since your question is a general DHCP client question, this list is the
right place.
> Is there some configuration I can give to the dhcp clients to tell them
> which dhcp ser
Howdy,
First, I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list. I couldn't find
a better one like deiban-clustering or debian-beowulf, but if there is,
please let me know.
A couple of friends are attempting to set up a beowulf cluster on debian.
I've currently installed dhcpd on
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 05:40:50PM -0800, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> Please let me know if you spot anything in the configs below.
I am not sure about those - but have you set the necessary kernel
options? that means you should have compiled the kernel with
capabilites for dhcp. Unfortunately, I
Hello,
I just installed 'testing' on my new VIA based machine using 2.6 (uname
-a --> Linux server 2.6.0-1-386 #2 Sun Jan 11 16:54:21 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux). Since this is supposed to be the firewall for my home
network I'm trying to get dhcpd to run - which I have sucessfull
On 15 Jan 2004, Ryan Mackay wrote:
> 192.168.0.20 is not a subnet, i think what you are after is 192.168.0.0
> --
> Cheers,
> rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
Thanks to you and Jacob for the advice. I find I don't need dhcp after
all for the moment, which is a relief, but I'll keep your replies fo
192.168.0.20 is not a subnet, i think what you are after is 192.168.0.0
--
Cheers,
rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This produces the following error in syslog:
>
> --
> No subnet declaration for eth0 (192.168.0.20).
> Jan 14 19:43:42 localhost dhcpd: Please write a subnet declaration in
> your dhcpd.conf file for the Jan 14 19:43:42 localhost
eth0 (192.168.0.20).
Jan 14 19:43:42 localhost dhcpd: Please write a subnet declaration in your dhcpd.conf
file for the
Jan 14 19:43:42 localhost dhcpd: network segment to which interface eth0 is attached.
Jan 14 19:43:42 localhost dhcpd: exiting
As it turns out, there was a typo in the firewall rules... the traffic
in question was indeed legit. D'oh!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:27:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> I don't know about the particulars but this is from man dhcpd.conf:
>"The bootp keyword
>
> allow bootp;
> deny bootp;
>
>The bootp flag is used to tell dhcpd whe
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 03:53:29PM -0600, Greg Norris wrote:
> It appears that sasami is trying to send bootp packets to one of the
> internal boxes. As far as I can see, tho, dhcpd is configured for dhcp
> only... I've included my dhcpd.conf below. Do I need to do something
>
configured dhcpd to provide static IPs for all of the permanent
boxes, as well as a pool of dynamic addresses. This seems to be
working more-or-less as expected... known systems are getting the
proper IPs, and others are being assigned one dynamically.
Periodically, however, I'm seeing the fol
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
When I boot the client pc ("bi-12x"), it gets the IP address
150.252.217.49 from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's
PXE messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
dhcpd/
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
When I boot the client pc ("bi-12x"), it gets the IP address
150.252.217.49 from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's PXE
messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
dhcpd/tftp server, it fin
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
When I boot the client pc ("bi-19x"), it gets the IP address
150.252.x.y from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's PXE
messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
dhcpd/tftp server, it finds the campus'
Kent West wrote:
When I boot the client pc ("bi-19x"), it gets the IP address
150.252.x.y from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's PXE
messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
dhcpd/tftp server, it finds the campus's central RIS serve
Kent West wrote:
Albert Dengg wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I get my client to get my tftp offering instead of the RIS
offering? BTW, the RIS server is on a different network segment.
you can simply add "next-server yourserver;" to your
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:26:40 -0600,
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600,
> > Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> >> fixed-address 150.252.x.y; # x & y to protect the innocent
>
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600,
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
fixed-address 150.252.x.y; # x & y to protect the innocent
..said Kent posting from 128.51. ;-)
Ssh-h-h! That's a secret!
I've always wondered if it was of any worth to not publish full I
Albert Dengg wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I get my client to get my tftp offering instead of the RIS
offering? BTW, the RIS server is on a different network segment.
you can simply add "next-server yourserver;" to your dhcpd.conf, either
fo
;hardware ethernet 00:03:47:16:e2:58;
>fixed-address 150.252.x.y; # x & y to protect the innocent
..said Kent posting from 128.51. ;-)
>filename "/lts/2.4.22-ltsp-1/pxelinux.0";
> }
>
> When I boot the client pc ("bi-19x"), it gets the IP ad
When I boot the client pc ("bi-19x"), it gets the IP address
> 150.252.x.y from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's PXE
> messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
> dhcpd/tftp server, it finds the campus's central RIS server instead.
fic client
machines via their MAC layer addresses. Here's one section of that conf
file:
host bi-19x {
hardware ethernet 00:03:47:16:e2:58;
fixed-address 150.252.x.y;# x & y to protect the innocent
filename "/lts/2.4.22-ltsp-1/pxelinux.0";
}
When I boot the client pc ("
e to always give
my laptop the same IP because then it works with all of my /etc/hosts
files on my other machines (no name server here!)
This is what the entry looks like now:
host yelena {
hardware ethernet 00:06:5b:d5:39:35;
fixed-address 192.168.0.6;
}
The problem is that dhc
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:35:55PM -0800, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
[ Please don't top post, it makes your post hard to read and easier
to ignore ]
> Hubert Chan states that I can just take my old config file and copy to
> the new tree. I assume you mean to copy it to where I am compiling the
> ker
Hubert Chan states that I can just take my old config file and copy to
the new tree. I assume you mean to copy it to where I am compiling the
kernel. But in which folder exactly and I assume this is prior to
running make-kpkg -config=menuconfig kernel-image
On Wednesday, Mar 5, 2003, at 12:21
d the kernel for one server, dhcpd would not work.
According to the error I didn't compile the kernel for certain aspects
of dhcpd. However, when I went through all the configuration items in
menuconfig I couldn't find what it seemed to be requiring. What in
fact do I need to check for?
>>>>> "Curtis" == Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Curtis> When I recompiled the kernel for one server, dhcpd would not
Curtis> work. According to the error I didn't compile the kernel for
Curtis> certain aspects of dhcpd. However, when I wen
When I recompiled the kernel for one server, dhcpd would not work.
According to the error I didn't compile the kernel for certain aspects
of dhcpd. However, when I went through all the configuration items in
menuconfig I couldn't find what it seemed to be requiring. What in
fact do
> >
> > > default-lease-time 600;
> > >
> > > but the DHCPREQEST messages are sent from the client every five minutes so
> > > I think that's not it either.
> >
> > Just to hit on the obvious... Did you tell dhcpd to reload its
>
nt from the client every five minutes so
> > I think that's not it either.
>
> Just to hit on the obvious... Did you tell dhcpd to reload its
> configuration after making the change? (/etc/init.d/dhcp restart)
Yep.
Turns out that Hendrik Sattler was correct in that the cli
he
> setting. I tried setting a "retry" but that was not it.
>
> In my server I've got
>
> default-lease-time 600;
>
> but the DHCPREQEST messages are sent from the client every five minutes so
> I think that's not it either.
Just to hit on the obvio
Gerald V. Livingston II, 2002-Dec-29 13:54 -0600:
> Jeff said:
>
> > Bill Moseley, 2002-Dec-29 10:44 -0800:
> >>
> >> In my server I've got
> >>
> >> default-lease-time 600;
> >>
> >> but the DHCPREQEST messages are sent from the client every five
> >> minutes so
>
> > The default lease time is
Jeff said:
> Bill Moseley, 2002-Dec-29 10:44 -0800:
>>
>> In my server I've got
>>
>> default-lease-time 600;
>>
>> but the DHCPREQEST messages are sent from the client every five
>> minutes so
> The default lease time is in seconds, so 600 is 5 minutes. That's why
> the clients make a new req
Bill Moseley, 2002-Dec-29 10:44 -0800:
>
> Running a few dhcp clients ends up generating a lot of DHCPREQUEST
> messages. I'm not clear how to set the interval that the client sends
> those requests. I looked at man dhclient.conf but didn't see the
> setting. I tried setting a "retry" but that
Running a few dhcp clients ends up generating a lot of DHCPREQUEST
messages. I'm not clear how to set the interval that the client sends
those requests. I looked at man dhclient.conf but didn't see the
setting. I tried setting a "retry" but that was not it.
In my server I've got
default-l
At 04:05 PM 11/22/02 -0800, Jeff wrote:
>Yeah, I saw that, but I don't what "SIGUSR1" is let alone how to send
>one. Perhaps you can shed some light on that for me?
man kill
kill -USR1
--
Bill Moseley
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Bill Moseley, 2002-Nov-22 14:15 -0800:
> At 11:07 AM 11/22/02 -0800, Jeff wrote:
>
> (regarding dnsmasq)
>
> >I was just wondering if there's a way to view the cache. I couldn't
> >find anything in the man page. Is it possible?
>
> I didn't try it but the man pages says:
>
>When it receiv
At 11:07 AM 11/22/02 -0800, Jeff wrote:
(regarding dnsmasq)
>I was just wondering if there's a way to view the cache. I couldn't
>find anything in the man page. Is it possible?
I didn't try it but the man pages says:
When it receives a SIGUSR1, dnsmasq writes cache statistics to the sys-
Jeff, 2002-Nov-22 10:25 -0800:
> Bill Moseley, 2002-Nov-22 09:06 -0800:
> > >I made one change to the
> > >/etc/init.d/dnsmasq script to make it listen only on eth1 upon
> > >startup. Quick and easy!
> >
> > I think you should be editing
> >/etc/default/dnsmasq
>
> Oops! You're right. I ju
Bill Moseley, 2002-Nov-22 09:06 -0800:
> >I made one change to the
> >/etc/init.d/dnsmasq script to make it listen only on eth1 upon
> >startup. Quick and easy!
>
> I think you should be editing
>/etc/default/dnsmasq
Oops! You're right. I just put that change here and also uncommented
the
At 06:02 AM 11/22/02 -0800, Jeff wrote:
>I can vouch for dnsmasq. I just installed it based on this email. I
>have a cable-modem connected to eth0 and eth1 goes to a hub and
>several PC's that are NAT'd.
Yep, I'm using it too. Seems fine, although not sure why not just use Bind
(except that dns
Bill Moseley, 2002-Nov-20 20:21 -0800:
> At 08:41 PM 11/20/02 -0600, David Bell wrote:
> >On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:57, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >> 2) if the ppp-reported name server changes how do I update the "option
> >> domain-name-servers" in my /etc/dhcpd.conf file automatically?
> >
> >I would r
At 08:41 PM 11/20/02 -0600, David Bell wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:57, Bill Moseley wrote:
>> 2) if the ppp-reported name server changes how do I update the "option
>> domain-name-servers" in my /etc/dhcpd.conf file automatically?
>
>I would recommend running a caching DNS server on this box,
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:57, Bill Moseley wrote:
> 2) if the ppp-reported name server changes how do I update the "option
> domain-name-servers" in my /etc/dhcpd.conf file automatically?
I would recommend running a caching DNS server on this box, since it
will be used to service a LAN. This way,
On the Debian machine eth0 will connect to the DSL modem, eth1 is MASQ'ed
internal net. dhcpd is running on eth1.
I have not used pppoe before (I have static IPs). I assume the ppp server
supplies the name server on connection.
1) what's the procedure to automatically update /etc/r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 08:56:59PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> I have no doubt that the 133 can handle DHCP and DNS and NAT (if I can
> get the two NICs in there to cooperate so that I can set up
> ipmasquerading). However, can it effectively run
RDBMS to query on it
too).
| (It won't be running any GUI apps whatsoever, so the only things running
| will be the various daemons and an instance of emacs.)
Sounds good to me.
I've got a 486SX (25MHz) with 8MB RAM at my parents' home handling
NAT. It sometimes runs dhcpd and I
I'm looking to migrate away from Microsoft products completely, and one
large step in that direction is to kill off my current primary server.
It's a p II 350 running W2K Advanced Server running IIS for the web
server and also handling DNS, DHCP, and NAT. It's also running as the
primary print serv
On 14-Mar-2002 Rick Pasotto wrote:
> When I try to start dhcpd I get the following in daemon.log:
>
> Mar 14 10:27:30 tc dhcpd-2.2.x: socket: Protocol not available - make
> sure CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER are defined in your kernel
> configuration!
> Mar 14 10:27:30 tc dh
When I try to start dhcpd I get the following in daemon.log:
Mar 14 10:27:30 tc dhcpd-2.2.x: socket: Protocol not available - make
sure CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER are defined in your kernel configuration!
Mar 14 10:27:30 tc dhcpd-2.2.x: exiting.
CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER *are* defined
On 09-Mar-2002 Charlie Grosvenor wrote:
> hi
> My machine has three network cards in it each attached to a different
> network. I am trying to use dhcpd to provide ip addresses to machines on two
> of the networks but don't want it to provide ip addresses to the third
>
hi
My machine has three network cards in it each attached to a different
network. I am trying to use dhcpd to provide ip addresses to machines on two
of the networks but don't want it to provide ip addresses to the third
network. I have but subnet declarations for the first two networks
> --exec /usr/sbin/dhcp eth1 eth2
> hth,
I only have one nic in this box, so it's either that or lo. But I'll try
that when I get home tonight.
>
> Mike
>
> Quoting Jason Majors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm trying to setup dhcpd on one machin
A good way to debug this situation is to monitor syslog on the dhcp
server as it gives a lot of details concerning leases it appropriates
to clients. This way you can see who is talking to whom.
Next on the list is tcpdump.
Elizabeth
AIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to setup dhcpd on one machine and setup my notebook as a dhcp
> client. I have this as my /etc/dhcpd.conf and have started dhcpd, but
> the
> notebook won't connect on dhcp. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
>
> #dhcpd.conf
I'm trying to setup dhcpd on one machine and setup my notebook as a dhcp
client. I have this as my /etc/dhcpd.conf and have started dhcpd, but the
notebook won't connect on dhcp. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jason
#dhcpd.conf
# option definitions common to all supported networks...
option d
tc/init.d/dhcp which i have doing what you want
> >
> > start)
> > start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $DHCPDPID \
> > --exec /usr/sbin/dhcpd eth1 -- -q
>
> Opsss, sorry but this didn't worked either. It keeps hanging the boot
> process.
>
p which i have doing what you want
> >
> > start)
> > start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $DHCPDPID \
> > --exec /usr/sbin/dhcpd eth1 -- -q
>
> Opsss, sorry but this didn't worked either. It keeps hanging the boot
> process.
> In case
On Friday 21 December 2001 15:00, you wrote:
> from my /etc/init.d/dhcp which i have doing what you want
>
> start)
> start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $DHCPDPID \
> --exec /usr/sbin/dhcpd eth1 -- -q
Opsss, sorry but this didn't worked either. It ke
Hi all !
I have a proxy and I want it to serve IP addresses to the internal
network using dhcpd.
/etc/dhcpd.conf describes the internal subnet only, which corresponds
to the interface eth1.
Looking in /var/log/daemon.log, dhcpd is complaining that there is no
declaration for the subnet
Jeff Vincent, 2001-Dec-12 15:49 -0700:
> Ahh!! The fog is beginning to lift. Thank's Jeff and Brandon (and
> others)!
:-)
>
> /*- From dhcpd.conf ?--- */
> option domain-name "";
> option routers X.Y.D.254;
> option subnet-mask 255.255.252.0;
>
> default-lease-tim
Ahh!! The fog is beginning to lift. Thank's Jeff and Brandon (and
others)!
I pasted in the output from ifconfig along with my dhcpd.conf as it is
being used now (and appears to be working).
/*- From ifconfig —--- */
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:AC:4C:5B:3F
any of this
> subnet in the dhcp pool) and now it seems to work. I am most confused.
Ah! I didn't catch that the first time. Yeah, you have to
declare all interfaces that the system has configured. Dhcpd
checks them all and shouldn't even start the daemon if there is a
configur
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
