I downloaded the ADT Bundle for Linux 64-bit from this page:
https://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html
I installed it and then I did manage to navigate to the eclipse file
using Dolphin and start eclipse by clicking on it. I just can't seem
to find it any more.
I just tried your suggestion and
On 11/12/2014 02:21 PM, Steve Greig wrote:
I have tried your suggestions and found quite a lot of files with the
word android or eclipse in them but I can not find the file called
eclipse which previously I had which when I clicked on it opened up
the eclipse program. Thanks for your help, Steve
I have tried your suggestions and found quite a lot of files with the
word android or eclipse in them but I can not find the file called
eclipse which previously I had which when I clicked on it opened up
the eclipse program. Thanks for your help, Steve
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Andrei POP
On Mi, 12 nov 14, 20:56:34, Joel Rees wrote:
>
> If you installed it under your user's home directory,
>
> find /home -name android
That would require a file and/or directory named exactly 'android'.
> Or updatedb (probably as root) and locate?
That should work.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Steve Greig wrote:
>>apt-cache search android | less
>
>>returns some interesting results?
>
>
> That was useful to know how to search the APT cache.
>
>
> I am thinking of starting a new thread as I am completely unable to
> find any of the files and folders I cr
[Please don't top post, it makes it hard to read/follow]
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 06:39:42PM +, Steve Greig wrote:
> >apt-cache search android | less
>
> >returns some interesting results?
>
>
> That was useful to know how to search the APT cache.
>
>
> I am thinking of starting a new th
>apt-cache search android | less
>returns some interesting results?
That was useful to know how to search the APT cache.
I am thinking of starting a new thread as I am completely unable to
find any of the files and folders I created when I downloaded and
installed the adt-bundle. I definitely
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 05:50:19PM +, Steve Greig wrote:
> I thought I would try and build an Android app and see that you have
> to download and install some software:
> adt-bundle-linux-x86_64-20140702.zip
>
>
> Before doing this (I often find installs go wrong) I was wondering if
> it is p
Thanks!
>Only needed to setup i386 arch and ia32-libs, and a few others.
I was reading about that on the link Patrick gave. It looks like it is
only required for the android emulator so I thought I might leave it
out initially as I can transfer the app to my android phone quite
easily to test it.
On 11/09/2014 12:50 PM, Steve Greig wrote:
I thought I would try and build an Android app and see that you have
to download and install some software:
adt-bundle-linux-x86_64-20140702.zip
Before doing this (I often find installs go wrong) I was wondering if
it is possible to do it using apt whi
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Steve Greig wrote:
> I thought I would try and build an Android app and see that you have
> to download and install some software:
> adt-bundle-linux-x86_64-20140702.zip
>
>
> Before doing this (I often find installs go wrong) I was wondering if
> it is possible to
I thought I would try and build an Android app and see that you have
to download and install some software:
adt-bundle-linux-x86_64-20140702.zip
Before doing this (I often find installs go wrong) I was wondering if
it is possible to do it using apt which I have had some success with.
Would be v
Dear All,
We are IT Solution Provider:
1.ERP Software Development.
2.E-Learning Software.
3.School or Collage Automation System.
4.MLM Software.
5.Medical Management System.
6.Customized Software Development
7.Web site Development.
8.Web hosting.
9.Dom
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:39:23PM +, Stephen Patterson wrote:
>> Other than the venerable emacs? Quanta, Bluefish, Mozilla Composer.
>
> If it doesn't pass the W3C's validator at http://validator.w3.org/,
> it's not HTML. None of the ones you named
-- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 10 June 2003, 01:42 AM -0700):
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you look at the
> > top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them are 100% standards compliant, and i
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Good Open Source Web Development software
>
>
> On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > > It works
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 11:18, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > C:\Windows\> reportbug
> > The command "reportbug" is either misspelled or could not be found.
>
> Try emailing them.
>
Sorry, I should have included \begin{humor} and \end{humor}
joerg
--
Gib GATES keine Chance!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> C:\Windows\> reportbug
> The command "reportbug" is either misspelled or could not be found.
Try emailing them.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debi
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:00:06AM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 June 2003 08:11, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > So contrary to popular belief, we should not design web pages to be
> > IE compliant, since they do not meet OPEN standards. Is this
> > surprising?
>
> Well, the problem is, the o
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 03:01, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I've yet to see it do that, but if that's the case, that's IE's
> problem, go file a bug report with Microsoft instead of coding to
> thier stupidity.
C:\Windows\> reportbug
The command "reportbug" is either misspelled or could not be found.
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 19:18, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:15:13PM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > > > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 08:11, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
>
> > To sum it up, yes, it is possible to easily design a fully W3C
> > compliant web page, which IE is not able to handle correctly. Two
> > years ago, I would have ignored this problem, arguing that many
> > people are using NS. But, nowadays
> To sum it up, yes, it is possible to easily design a fully W3C compliant
> web page, which IE is not able to handle correctly. Two years ago, I
> would have ignored this problem, arguing that many people are using NS.
> But, nowadays, how can I convice myself to ignore 90% ?
So contrary to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:15:13PM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> I'm afraid this is not the case Paul. IE is not always able to render
> fully compliant pages, in a decent way.
I've yet to see it do that, but if that's the case, that's IE's
problem, go
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2003 14:03, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> > I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> > ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP
> > machine and was wondering what Op
I don't know; a home built gtk-gl version also bombs, but a build
against lesstif works fine.
You could do:
cd /usr/src ; apt-get source amaya
modify the debian/rules file to say --without-g...
then build a package ("debian/rules -b") sans gtk-gl.
I've used "../configure --with-x --withou
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:15:13PM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you
> > > look at the top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them ar
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:42:07AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > I read a while back that Amaya development/updating wasn't very
> > rapid.
>
> It supports the current standard. People who make the complaint that
> it doesn't get rapid de
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you
> > look at the top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them are 100% standards
> > compliant, and if you have 100% standards compli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you look at the
> top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them are 100% standards compliant, and if you
> have 100% standards compliant, you'l
On Monday 09 June 2003 14:03, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP
> machine and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out there
> for Debian. Does any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:10:07PM -0400, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the suggestions. Bluefish looks intriguing. Has anyone
> ever used Amaya? I would think that it should be solid coming from w3.org.
Amaya works well. I use it whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:39:23PM +, Stephen Patterson wrote:
> Other than the venerable emacs? Quanta, Bluefish, Mozilla Composer.
If it doesn't pass the W3C's validator at http://validator.w3.org/,
it's not HTML. None of the ones you named do.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:33:14PM -0400, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> No, really. There aren't any real WYSIWYG-style web development tools
> for linux, not free, anyways.
Uhh, you must never bother looking at web standards when you're
creating p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:03:12PM -0400, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether.
Amaya's the only one you need. Standards compliant, too, so instead
of disgra
--- Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > -- Kevin
Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> (on Monday, 09 June 2003, 02:03 PM -0400):
> > I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> > ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LA
Thus spake Clive Menzies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On (09/06/03 14:03), Kevin Griffis wrote:
> > I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> > ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> > and was wondering what Open Source web desi
age-
> From: Clive Menzies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:01 PM
> To: Kevin Griffis
> Cc: Debian-User
> Subject: Re: Good Open Source Web Development software
>
>
> On (09/06/03 14:03), Kevin Griffis wrote:
> > I would like to eventuall
On (09/06/03 14:03), Kevin Griffis wrote:
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out there for
> Debian. Does anyone have
On Mon, 09 Jun 2003 20:20:13 +0200, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out the
-- Kevin Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Monday, 09 June 2003, 02:03 PM -0400):
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> and was wondering what Open Source web design tools ar
--- Kevin Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Greetings all,
>
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out there for
Greetings all,
I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out there for
Debian. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Thank you fo
On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 01:08:09 -0500, John Foster wrote:
> I need project development software for linux. It needs to be of the type
> that is teamwork oriented and allows offsite participation by team
> members. It must be web or server based so that it runs in a web
> environment.
I need project development software for linux. It needs to be of the
type that is teamwork oriented and allows offsite participation by team
members. It must be web or server based so that it runs in a web
environment. This is to be used for developing several items of software
and other projects
45 matches
Mail list logo
