-- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 10 June 2003, 01:42 AM -0700): > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote: > > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you look at the > > top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them are 100% standards compliant, and if you > > have 100% standards compliant, you'll be excluding over 90% of the browser > > users on the internet). > > No you wouldn't, because all the browsers out can decently render a > 100% compliant page. I've yet to find a browser that can't.
Not to be too contrary here, but if you've ever played with absolute and relative positioned elements and written 100% standards compliant HTML and CSS to do so, you absolutely MUST have found a browser that can't decently render it. It's called Netscape 4.x. Doesn't matter which platform (windows, *nix, mac), it simply is a buggy browser with bad support for standards. IE4 is only slightly better; IE5 only slightly better than that; at least with these browsers, you'll still be able to *see* all the content, which is not necessarily the case with NN4. Just my 2 cents as a (often frustrated) web developer. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://matthew.weierophinney.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
