>BS> No, some mail to news gateway is broken and
>is bouncing ALL
>BS> debian-devel mails back to debian-user.
>Notice the Sender and
>BS> X-Authentication-Warning headers.
>I was beginning to wonder how come there were so many
>packaging/policy
>related posts coming through to debia
>I think the solution for now is to make a filter >to
/dev/null for all
>mail from webforce.com.hk.
Some of us don't have that luxury. Pity me, for I am
using windows to access this list, and have no
lifeline to debian until I save enough for a new pc.
Although that filtration thing could work u
a filter to /dev/null for all
mail from webforce.com.hk.
*- On 30 Dec, Kai Henningsen wrote about "debian-user mangles mails"
> Here's an example:
>
>> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Dec
a filter to /dev/null for all
mail from webforce.com.hk.
*- On 30 Dec, Kai Henningsen wrote about "debian-user mangles mails"
> Here's an example:
>
>> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Dec
On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 03:16:00AM +0800, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Note the second line. I assume something processing debian-user mails
> mishandles (that is, drops) continuation lines. Probably the same stuff
> that rearranges them (something that also should not happen).
I noticed some multi
Here's an example:
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:37 +0100
> Received: from uucp by khms.westfalen.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.11 #1)
> id 123LFF-CG-01 (Debian); Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:37 +0100
> Received: from
6 matches
Mail list logo
