No, some mail to news gateway is broken and is bouncing ALL debian-devel mails back to debian-user. Notice the Sender and X-Authentication-Warning headers. I have notified [EMAIL PROTECTED] and root/postmaster/[EMAIL PROTECTED] But it is still doing it.
I think the solution for now is to make a filter to /dev/null for all mail from webforce.com.hk. *- On 30 Dec, Kai Henningsen wrote about "debian-user mangles mails" > Here's an example: > >> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:37 +0100 >> Received: from uucp by khms.westfalen.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) >> id 123LFF-0000CG-01 (Debian); Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:37 +0100 >> Received: from murphy.debian.org ([209.41.108.199]) >> by muenster.westfalen.de with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) >> id 123KeC-0004xK-00 >> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:04:22 +0100 >> Received: (qmail 5231 invoked by uid 38); 29 Dec 1999 15:02:51 -0000 >> Resent-Date: 29 Dec 1999 15:02:50 -0000 >> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ; >> X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> X-Authentication-Warning: niet.webforce.com.hk: news set sender to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f To: debian-user@lists.debian.org ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Date: 29 Dec 1999 23:00:43 +0800 >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Organization: I just... >> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; >> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: su, sudo and resource limits >> Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org >> X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/76902 >> X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org >> Precedence: list >> Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Note that Content-Type: line? > > Here's the same header from debian-devel: > >> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Delivery-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:37 +0100 >> Received: from uucp by khms.westfalen.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) >> id 123LFE-0000CG-0A (Debian); Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:36 +0100 >> Received: from murphy.debian.org ([209.41.108.199]) >> by muenster.westfalen.de with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) >> id 123Kbi-0004lA-00 >> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:01:47 +0100 >> Received: (qmail 323 invoked by uid 38); 29 Dec 1999 14:58:20 -0000 >> Resent-Date: 29 Dec 1999 14:58:20 -0000 >> Resent-CC: recipient list not shown: ; >> X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:57:25 +0100 >> From: Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org >> Subject: su, sudo and resource limits >> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Mime-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; >> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" >> User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i >> Organization: I just... >> Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org >> X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/51714 >> X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org >> Precedence: list >> Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Note the second line. I assume something processing debian-user mails > mishandles (that is, drops) continuation lines. Probably the same stuff > that rearranges them (something that also should not happen). > > MfG Kai > > Brian Servis -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mechanical Engineering | Never criticize anybody until you Purdue University | have walked a mile in their shoes, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | because by that time you will be a http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis | mile away and have their shoes.
