On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:40:22 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 12 October 2015 16:04:03 moxalt wrote:
> > I thought that was a bit strange and enquired
> > as to whether the Debian list sends people's messages back to them by
> > default. Since I had only just subscribed and had not received a
On Monday 12 October 2015 16:04:03 moxalt wrote:
> I thought that was a bit strange and enquired
> as to whether the Debian list sends people's messages back to them by
> default. Since I had only just subscribed and had not received any posts
> back yet I had cause to wonder.
I get mine back, pro
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:04:03 +0300, moxalt wrote:
> > Besides no attribution or quoting
>
> Anyone subscribed to the mailing list and in a client with threading will be
> able to see the context, and anyone recently subscribed can look at the
> archives for all I care. If a message deserves a po
> Besides no attribution or quoting
Anyone subscribed to the mailing list and in a client with threading will be
able to see the context, and anyone recently subscribed can look at the
archives for all I care. If a message deserves a point-by-point rebuttal I'll
give it one in the appropriate form
On 10/11/2015 11:58 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 11 October 2015 22:43:11 maderios wrote:
On 10/11/2015 09:54 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 11 October 2015 19:06:11 moxalt wrote:
Wait.. so Debian doesn't send your own replies back to you by default?
That seems like a rather strange defaul
Hi,
Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > So for me follow-up in tin on aioe.org doesn't work.
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Seems the mail-news gateway doesn't dare to forward
> followups in the other direction
https://wiki.debian.org/UseNet
"Theoretically, registering with bofh.it will allow you to post v
Martin Str|mberg [2015-10-12 11:00:17+02] wrote:
> Now I hope somebody can tell me if there's an easier way to reply to
> the list using tin, hitting r (for reply to sender) and then replacing
> the mail address of the post I'm replying to with d-u@l.d.o, so I
> don't forget to do that in my excit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:36:47PM +0200, Martin Str|mberg wrote:
[...]
> > what you are looking for (instead of "reply"). So perhaps try an "f".
>
> That doesn't work. It tried several times (three?) first before realising
> that my replies didn't
Hi,
Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> I read this as the news group linux.debian.user on aioe.org with tin.
Actually debian-user is a mailing list, not a newsgroup.
(Communicating via POP, IMAP, SMTP instead of NNTP.)
The group is obviously a mirror of the list.
My news provider has it and it seems up t
In article to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:00:17AM +0200, Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > In article Lisi Reisz
> > wrote:
> > > D'oh! I was forgetting that this list is not subscribers only.
> >
> > Really?!
> >
> > I hope
On Monday 12 October 2015 10:00:17 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> In article Lisi Reisz
wrote:
> > D'oh! I was forgetting that this list is not subscribers only.
>
> Really?!
>
> I hope this goes through.
It has.
> I sure have been wanting to reply to some things.
> I read this as the news group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:00:17AM +0200, Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> In article Lisi Reisz
> wrote:
> > D'oh! I was forgetting that this list is not subscribers only.
>
> Really?!
>
> I hope this goes through. I sure have been wanting to reply to
In article Lisi Reisz
wrote:
> D'oh! I was forgetting that this list is not subscribers only.
Really?!
I hope this goes through. I sure have been wanting to reply to some things.
I read this as the news group linux.debian.user on aioe.org with tin.
Now I hope somebody can tell me if there's
On Sunday 11 October 2015 22:43:11 maderios wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 09:54 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 October 2015 19:06:11 moxalt wrote:
> >> Wait.. so Debian doesn't send your own replies back to you by default?
> >> That seems like a rather strange default (and that behaviour is the
>
On 10/11/2015 09:54 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 11 October 2015 19:06:11 moxalt wrote:
Wait.. so Debian doesn't send your own replies back to you by default? That
seems like a rather strange default (and that behaviour is the default in
mailman).
It isn't Debian that doesn't. It's Gmail.
On Sunday 11 October 2015 19:06:11 moxalt wrote:
> Wait.. so Debian doesn't send your own replies back to you by default? That
> seems like a rather strange default (and that behaviour is the default in
> mailman).
It isn't Debian that doesn't. It's Gmail.
Lisi
On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 20:40:32 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Brian wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Can we discard this crystal ball of yours and cast a few runes or examine
> > chicken entrails instead? :)
>
> :-)
>
> > X-Spam-Status gives a list of SpamAssa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 06:50:13PM +0100, Brian wrote:
[...]
> Can we discard this crystal ball of yours and cast a few runes or examine
> chicken entrails instead? :)
:-)
> X-Spam-Status gives a list of SpamAssassin tests that returned a non-zero
On 10/11/2015 02:31 PM, maderios wrote:
I could subscribe 'normaly' 3 minute ago to this list.
I don't understand because I never unscribed myself. Only me (or my cat
:) ) can use my computer... May be a bug?
I hope it works now.
Thanks to everybody
Greetings
Sorry for noise.
I forgot 'Solved'
moxalt writes:
> Debian doesn't send your own replies back to you by default?
Yes it does.
> That seems like a rather strange default
It's Gmail that has the strange default.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 21:06:11 +0300, moxalt wrote:
> Wait.. so Debian doesn't send your own replies back to you by default? That
> seems like a rather strange default (and that behaviour is the default in
> mailman).
Besides no attribution or quoting you appear to have completely missed
understa
Wait.. so Debian doesn't send your own replies back to you by default? That
seems like a rather strange default (and that behaviour is the default in
mailman).
On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 09:01:12 -0700, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 05:08 AM, maderios wrote:
>
> >Strangely, it works partially now, only for this thread 'debian-user
> >list problem'. I receive mail with this thread but I can't receive mail
> >from
On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 17:00:43 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 03:01:23PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 15:17:19 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:40:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was wondering what the signifi
On 10/11/2015 05:08 AM, maderios wrote:
Strangely, it works partially now, only for this thread 'debian-user
list problem'. I receive mail with this thread but I can't receive mail
from other threads.
About my spam box: I watch it very often. It is empty.
Maderios is your prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 03:01:23PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 15:17:19 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:40:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > > I was wondering what the significance of LDOSUBSCRIBER in th
On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 15:17:19 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:40:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
>
> > I was wondering what the significance of LDOSUBSCRIBER in the headers
> > of the first mail in this thread is.
> >
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=4.0 tests=DK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:40:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 14:15:15 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:37:03PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Complain at Google. Perhaps it helps.
> > >
On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 14:15:15 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:37:03PM +0100, Brian wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Complain at Google. Perhaps it helps.
> >
> > How do you work out that the OP's subscription address is a gmail one?
>
> Crystal ball. Plus... reading mail h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:37:03PM +0100, Brian wrote:
[...]
> > Complain at Google. Perhaps it helps.
>
> How do you work out that the OP's subscription address is a gmail one?
Crystal ball. Plus... reading mail headers (some excerpts):
| From bo
On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 13:43:50 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:08:34PM +0200, maderios wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Strangely, it works partially now, only for this thread 'debian-user
> > list problem'. I receive mail with this thread
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:31:47PM +0200, maderios wrote:
[...]
> Hi
> I could subscribe 'normaly' 3 minute ago to this list.
> I don't understand because I never unscribed myself. Only me (or my
> cat :) ) can use my computer... May be a bug?
or a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
[...]
> I think it just means that some of us are cc-ing him, :-)
See my other mail: definitely the more plausible explanation :-)
- -- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.
esn't seem to be a problem this end. It really must be your end.
Lisi
Strangely, it works partially now, only for this thread 'debian-user
list problem'. I receive mail with this thread but I can't receive mail
from other threads.
About my spam box: I watch it very often. It i
On Sunday 11 October 2015 12:43:50 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:08:34PM +0200, maderios wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Strangely, it works partially now, only for this thread 'debian-user
> &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:10:17PM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> You are receiving mails because people put you in Carbon Copy (Cc:).
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/503224 check this thread
> for all the messages.
Yep, that makes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:08:34PM +0200, maderios wrote:
[...]
> Strangely, it works partially now, only for this thread 'debian-user
> list problem'. I receive mail with this thread but I can't receive
> mail from other
are
> > getting your emails. Perhaps *your* spam checker has decided that the
> > Debian List is Spam. Have you checked?
> >
> > There doesn't seem to be a problem this end. It really must be your end.
> >
> > Lisi
>
> Strangely, it works partially now, o
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:08:34PM +0200, maderios wrote:
> Strangely, it works partially now, only for this thread 'debian-user list
> problem'. I receive mail with this thread but I can't receive mail from
> other threads.
> About my spam box: I watch it very o
partially now, only for this thread 'debian-user
list problem'. I receive mail with this thread but I can't receive mail
from other threads.
About my spam box: I watch it very often. It is empty.
--
Maderios
On Sunday 11 October 2015 12:20:14 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lisi Reisz wrote to Maderios:
> > You are still subscribed.
>
> Is he ?
> (Is there a list of members ?)
D'oh! I was forgetting that this list is not subscribers only.
Lisi
>
> To Maderios:
> What happens if you try to subscribe
On Sun 11 Oct 2015 at 12:04:20 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 October 2015 11:18:25 maderios wrote:
> > > I try to answer. I have to read first the web page, it's not so easy.
> > > Sorry. Some details:
>
> [...]
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 01:20:14PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lisi Reisz wrote to Maderios:
> > You are still subscribed.
>
> Is he ?
> (Is there a list of members ?)
Thomas, insightful as always :-)
You're quite right: one is able to p
Hi,
Lisi Reisz wrote to Maderios:
> You are still subscribed.
Is he ?
(Is there a list of members ?)
To Maderios:
What happens if you try to subscribe again with the same
e-mail address ?
I cannot yet imagine how your mail of Oct 8 could unsubscribe
you. But one never knows.
Lisi Reisz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 11 October 2015 11:18:25 maderios wrote:
> > I try to answer. I have to read first the web page, it's not so easy.
> > Sorry. Some details:
[...]
> > I try to understand what ha
On Sunday 11 October 2015 11:18:25 maderios wrote:
> I try to answer. I have to read first the web page, it's not so easy.
> Sorry. Some details:
> I subscribed for many years to debian-user, debian-user-french,
> digikam-users, enlightenment-users.
> All works perfectly *now*, except for debian-us
I try to answer. I have to read first the web page, it's not so easy. Sorry.
Some details:
I subscribed for many years to debian-user, debian-user-french,
digikam-users, enlightenment-users.
All works perfectly *now*, except for debian-user list since I posted
this message some days ago.
https:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:23:22PM +0200, maderios wrote:
> Hi
> I cannot receive anymore debian-user list messages since I posted this
> message:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/10/msg00201.html
> Yesterday, I posted a message to listmas...@lists.debian.org but I didn't
> get any answ
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:30:29PM +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:01:18PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Brian isn't always "kind". But he is very knowledgeable and a definite
> > asset
> > to the mailing list. Please don't tell him to go away. As you say in your
> >
On Sat 10 Oct 2015 at 23:30:29 +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:01:18PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Brian isn't always "kind". But he is very knowledgeable and a definite
> > asset
> > to the mailing list. Please don't tell him to go away. As you say in your
> > ad
On Sat 10 Oct 2015 at 21:58:13 +0200, Timothy Hobbs wrote:
> The question, is whether it is better to be mean to someone, or to ignore
> them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NI18UrCkBEk
That's one of life's great imponderables.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:01:18PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Brian isn't always "kind". But he is very knowledgeable and a definite asset
> to the mailing list. Please don't tell him to go away. As you say in your
> advice to him, you can always ignore him if you don't like something he says.
On Saturday 10 October 2015 20:33:03 Timothy Hobbs wrote:
> If you don't have time to be kind,
> you should stop reading the mailing list and do the things that are
> obviously more important to you.
Brian isn't always "kind". But he is very knowledgeable and a definite asset
to the mailing list
The question, is whether it is better to be mean to someone, or to
ignore them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NI18UrCkBEk
On 10/10/15 21:48, Brian wrote:
On Sat 10 Oct 2015 at 21:33:03 +0200, Timothy Hobbs wrote:
Brian, that wasn't a very kind email. If you don't have time to be kind, you
On Sat 10 Oct 2015 at 21:33:03 +0200, Timothy Hobbs wrote:
> Brian, that wasn't a very kind email. If you don't have time to be kind, you
Thank you. I'm not impervious to flattery.
> should stop reading the mailing list and do the things that are obviously
> more important to you.
Perhaps *you*
Brian, that wasn't a very kind email. If you don't have time to be kind,
you should stop reading the mailing list and do the things that are
obviously more important to you.
On 10/10/15 21:30, Brian wrote:
On Sat 10 Oct 2015 at 19:23:22 +0200, maderios wrote:
I cannot receive anymore debian-
On Sat 10 Oct 2015 at 19:23:22 +0200, maderios wrote:
> I cannot receive anymore debian-user list messages since I posted this
> message:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/10/msg00201.html
Between then and now you (using the technical term) cocked up your email
system. Only you know how
Hi
I cannot receive anymore debian-user list messages since I posted this
message:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/10/msg00201.html
Yesterday, I posted a message to listmas...@lists.debian.org but I
didn't get any answer.
What can I do?
Thanks for any help.
Greetings
--
Maderios
58 matches
Mail list logo
