Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> The main problem with your suggestion is that the default umask of 022
> doesn't do any good even if your directory is group sticky. You would
> need a umask of 002.
Thank you for mentioning that. I had forgotten to mention umask.
Fortunately umask is an easy, easy, e
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:14:45PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > I agree. That should really be handled using famd.
>
> *IF* it were needed to be changed when files appeared there then I
> would agree to go with famd. It is a good suggestion in that case.
> But I reall
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> I agree. That should really be handled using famd.
*IF* it were needed to be changed when files appeared there then I
would agree to go with famd. It is a good suggestion in that case.
But I really don't think there is a need for this that can't be
handled by appropri
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:00:24PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Chris Robinson wrote:
> > I am trying to run the folloing in woody using cron so my cron
> >
> > 2,12,22,32,42,52 * * * * /path to macro
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > #
Chris Robinson wrote:
> I can not find a log. The macro does not work via cron. The macro runs
> if I run it as root.
Oh, and it is not a macro. And the output will not go to the log but
will instead be mailed to the owner of the cron task. Who owns that
cron task? Look in that user's mailbo
Chris Robinson wrote:
> I am trying to run the folloing in woody using cron so my cron
>
> 2,12,22,32,42,52 * * * * /path to macro
>
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> #
Chris Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I am trying to run the [following] in woody using cron so my cron
>
> 2,12,22,32,42,52 * * * * /path to macro
I assume this is in /etc/crontab, yes? You need to tell cron who to
run it by:
2,12,22,32,42,52 * * * * root /path to macro
> #!/bin/sh
Hi
I am trying to run the folloing in woody using cron so my cron
2,12,22,32,42,52 * * * * /path to macro
#!/bin/sh
#
#
8 matches
Mail list logo
