Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > I agree. That should really be handled using famd.
*IF* it were needed to be changed when files appeared there then I would agree to go with famd. It is a good suggestion in that case. But I really don't think there is a need for this that can't be handled by appropriate application of set-group-id directories and groups to avoid the problem entirely. I see the question as an indication of a design problem that could be avoided by doing it completely differently. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
