absolute
minimum, and its temperature is about 62-63C (passive cooling only,
stock case). I see no reason to push it further with cpufreq.
Reco
284 bug?
>> kernel 4.19.0-6-arm64 does not solve this problem.
>
> Confirming. And it's not going to change unless someone ports
> bcm2835-cpufreq.c [1] to the mainline kernel.
>
> Reco
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-4.1.y/drivers/cpufreq/bcm2835-cpufreq.c
>
it's not going to change unless someone ports
bcm2835-cpufreq.c [1] to the mainline kernel.
Reco
[1]
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-4.1.y/drivers/cpufreq/bcm2835-cpufreq.c
Hello,
has someone run debian on rpi 3b or 3b+?
can anybody confirm this
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939284 bug?
kernel 4.19.0-6-arm64 does not solve this problem.
Best Regards
On 02/09/17 09:16, Hans wrote:
I discovered, that the cpu frequency is been set automatically to "high",
although I forced it to stay low.
To do this, I wrote a script:
---
#!/bin/sh
cpufreq-set -c 0 -u 1000MHz
cpufreq-set -c 1 -u 1000MHz
---
This script, executed with root permi
Hello list,
I discovered, that the cpu frequency is been set automatically to "high",
although I forced it to stay low.
To do this, I wrote a script:
---
#!/bin/sh
cpufreq-set -c 0 -u 1000MHz
cpufreq-set -c 1 -u 1000MHz
---
This script, executed with root permissions, is setti
After some discussion with Liquorix people (who are still not convinced by
intel_pstate)
http://techpatterns.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=12509#12509
I'm going to try out the new 'schedutils' option with acpi-cpufreq
See how it goes eh.
Regards,
Julian
On 16 January 2017 at 23:49
Dear Luis,
Many thanks for your input and guidance here.
'Have you tried to see if this happens with debian's official kernel?'
Doh! Of course.
Yes I have now, and intel_pstate is active - yay.
Complete newb with any kind of kernel config/tweaking/rebuilding - need to
do some reading-up.
Thanks
On lunes, 16 de enero de 2017 1:13:09 (CET) Julian Brooks wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Julian,
> Fresh install of Sid, with
> liquorix 4.9-3 (2017-01-07) x86_64 kernel (for RT audio work).
> Have also installed linrunner's TLP.
Have you tried to see if this happens with debian's official kernel?
> My un
ssor should make use of
intel_pstate for frequency scaling but I can't seem to load the kernel
module at boot.
TLP (and other sources) are telling me the system has acpi-cpufreq running
the frequency scaling.
Have tried adding 'intel_pstate=enable' to grub (+ update-grub), no change
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, mad wrote:
> I'm wondering if CPU frequency sclaing works with a Xeon E3-1220Lv2.
Yes. But AFAIK the cpufreq backend kernel driver for that platform depends
on the motherboard's ACPI information to work.
i.e. make sure your UEFI/BIOS is up-to-date, and proper
s?
Web searches were not very informative and cpufreq-info only says:
# cpufreq-info
cpufrequtils 008: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2009
Report errors and bugs to cpuf...@vger.kernel.org, please.
analyzing CPU 0:
no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
maximum transition l
gt;>
>> /etc/default/cpufrequtils and see if that has MAX_SPEED set (if so,
Strange I even don't have the /etc/default/cpufrequtils.
analyzing CPU 7:
driver: acpi-cpufreq
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
CPUs which need to have their frequency coor
Le vendredi 23 novembre 2012 12:20:03 UTC+1, Darac Marjal a écrit :
> OK. This says that the "performance" governor may choose to set the
>
> frequency between 800 and 800 MHz. Have a look in
>
> /etc/default/cpufrequtils and see if that has MAX_SPEED set (if so,
>
> either remove the line or s
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 02:48:04AM -0800, Clément Savalle wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have trouble with the frequence of my CPU. It's seemed to be lock on 800M=
> Hz. Idle or stressing, the freq is always 800MHz.
> I'm trying to set it by `# cpufreq-set -u 1.6GHz`
Hi everyone,
I have trouble with the frequence of my CPU. It's seemed to be lock on 800M=
Hz. Idle or stressing, the freq is always 800MHz.
I'm trying to set it by `# cpufreq-set -u 1.6GHz` but that command doesn't =
return an error but doesn't change anything.
I tried it in a
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:08:36 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
>> Mmm, and why not center the attention in the application which is not
>> acting as it should? If something is wrong at powerdevil's side it
>> should be corrected/fixed/solved/debugged there.
>>
>
> Hi Camaleon,
>
> the point is: pow
> Mmm, and why not center the attention in the application which is not
> acting as it should? If something is wrong at powerdevil's side it should
> be corrected/fixed/solved/debugged there.
>
> Greetings,
Hi Camaleon,
the point is: powerdevil got this function earlier, but the developers som
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:36:58 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> As powerdevil changed last year, I found no way, to force the cpu to
> stay at lowest clock, even when a process wants full speed.
>
> My solution at the moment is, to use cpufreq-set, where I can set the
> cpu to l
On 15/01/12 21:48, Ralf Madorf wrote:
PolicyKit
It would help if you could give a little more insightpointers on how to
do it? ;)
Lorenzo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archiv
PolicyKit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1326664115.1178.189.camel@localhost.localdomain
at the moment is, to use cpufreq-set, where I can set the cpu to
> lowest frequency.
>
> But there is a problem: I can do this only as user root!
>
> A solution is, to change the rights of the binary of cpufreq-set to i.e.
> group
> "powerdevil" and sticky bit t
Dear list,
please let me describe a little problem.
As powerdevil changed last year, I found no way, to force the cpu to stay at
lowest clock, even when a process wants full speed.
My solution at the moment is, to use cpufreq-set, where I can set the cpu to
lowest frequency.
But there is a
PS: Don't get me wrong, I run the script as root too, but using gksu I
only need to do it for one time a session.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/13221
Hi Lorenzo :)
- PyGTK gksu (I don't know this, since I'm not a Py coder)
- PolicyKit (I never set it up myself)
- set SUID bit for /usr/bin/cpufreq-set (I did this a long time a go:
spinymouse-sudo@64studio:~$ sudo -i
root@64studio:~# chmod u+s /usr/bin/cpufreq-selector
This
gt; Tab: General> Click the icon for "Add a new empty
item" (or later "Edit the currently selected item")>
Name:CPUfreq-GOVtoggle
Comment: Toggle CPU frequency scaling governor
Command: cpufreq-govtoggle
Icon:Application icons/xfce4-cpufrq-plugin or
Panel > Add New Items... > Mark
"Launcher" > + Add > Close >
Right click the launcher icon > Move it, if wanted > Right click again >
Properties > Tab: General > Click the icon for "Add a new empty
item" (or later "Edit the currently selected item&
s. keeling :
> Damon L. Chesser :
> >
> > error. My bios had "Cool and Quite" turned off. I did not catch that,
> > I was looking for some other bios settings. I really am not a big fan
>
> Makes me wanna reboot and hunt around for Cool and Quiet.
No such animal on an HP dv4 laptop.
> I
Damon L. Chesser :
>
> error. My bios had "Cool and Quite" turned off. I did not catch that,
> I was looking for some other bios settings. I really am not a big fan
Makes me wanna reboot and hunt around for Cool and Quiet.
I usually have this on 525 MHz using "ondemand" governor. Damned ne
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 05:34 +, s. keeling wrote:
> Damon L. Chesser :
> > For some reason, I don't have cpufreq scaling enabled:
>
> Well that's pretty damned sad. :-P I really don't get cpufreq*
> myself. Methinks it's far too young software.
>
Damon L. Chesser :
> For some reason, I don't have cpufreq scaling enabled:
Well that's pretty damned sad. :-P I really don't get cpufreq*
myself. Methinks it's far too young software.
> da...@dam-main:~$ sudo powernowd -d
> PowerNow Daemon v1.00, (c) 2003-2008
For some reason, I don't have cpufreq scaling enabled:
da...@dam-main:~$ sudo powernowd -d
PowerNow Daemon v1.00, (c) 2003-2008 John Clemens
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/affected_cpus: No such file or
directory
err=2Found 2 scalable units: -- 1 'CPU' per scalable unit
/sys
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Alexander Samad wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Davide Baldini
> wrote:
>> On 09/03/10 13:53, Alexander Samad wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>>
>>
>> I'd check if "preformance" does his job. Try set it with
&g
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Davide Baldini
wrote:
> On 09/03/10 13:53, Alexander Samad wrote:
[snip]
>>
>
> I'd check if "preformance" does his job. Try set it with
> # cpufreq-set -g performance
> and stress the cpu to see if frequency rises, for examp
On 09/03/10 13:53, Alexander Samad wrote:
Hi
I am having problems on my media box, it used to be able to play hd
stuff easily, recently it has been having problems.
I believe I have tracked down the problem to cpufreq-utils.
analyzing CPU 3:
driver: powernow-k8
CPUs which run at the
Hi
I am having problems on my media box, it used to be able to play hd
stuff easily, recently it has been having problems.
I believe I have tracked down the problem to cpufreq-utils.
analyzing CPU 3:
driver: powernow-k8
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 3
CPUs which need to
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 04:46:42PM +, T o n g wrote:
> What's the Debian way to enable ondemand cpufreq governor by default
> (installing as minimum packages as possible)?
If you are running some sort of userland daemon (e.g. laptop-mode) to
manage power, you'll probably h
T o n g writes:
>>> You need to edit /etc/default/cpufrequtils and read the comments.
>
> I don't have such file as /etc/default/cpufrequtils*, so nowhere to read
> the comments from.
Copy one of the sample files in /usr/share/doc/cpufrequtils/examples/
to /etc/default/cpufrequtils and edit at
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:59:04 +, T o n g wrote:
>>> . . . I have to do 'modprobe powernow-k8' and change the cpufreq
>>> governor from performance to ondemand each time after I reboot. . .
The simple solution is to install 'cpufrequtils', then *reboot*
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:39:54 -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>> . . . I have to do 'modprobe powernow-k8' and change the cpufreq
>> governor from performance to ondemand each time after I reboot. . .
>>
> . . . my preferred package is 'powernowd'. . . IT
T o n g wrote:
> I took a look at it, but still don't know how not to 'modprobe powernow-
> k8' manually.
>
> Any specific hints?
>
/etc/modules
Just add the module name there.
--
micro:
Thinker toys.
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:11:14 -0400, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
>> You need to edit /etc/default/cpufrequtils and read the comments.
I don't have such file as /etc/default/cpufrequtils*, so nowhere to read
the comments from.
> Actually /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils
I took a look at it, but still don'
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Wackojacko wrote:
> You need to edit /etc/default/cpufrequtils and read the comments.
Actually /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils
The locatation of this file appears to be changed from an earlier version.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
T o n g wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:21:38 +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
What's the Debian way to enable ondemand cpufreq governor by default
(installing as minimum packages as possible)?
look at this package cpufrequtils and then look in here
/etc/init.d/cpufrequtils
If I don't
> CPUFreq Utilities: Setting ondemand CPUFreq governor...disabled,
> governor not available...done.
Did you the governor kernel module?. You can find this modules with:
'modprobe -l cpufreq\*'. If you want to load these modules
automatically, just add their names to /etc/modul
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:21:38 +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
>> What's the Debian way to enable ondemand cpufreq governor by default
>> (installing as minimum packages as possible)?
>
> look at this package cpufrequtils and then look in here
> /etc/init.d/cpufrequtils
If I d
* T o n g [2009 Jul 11 11:48 -0500]:
> Hi,
>
> I am able to use the 2.6 kernel ondemand cpufreq governor, but I just
> noticed that I have to do 'modprobe powernow-k8' and change the cpufreq
> governor from performance to ondemand each time after I reboot.
>
>
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 04:46:42PM +, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am able to use the 2.6 kernel ondemand cpufreq governor, but I just
> noticed that I have to do 'modprobe powernow-k8' and change the cpufreq
> governor from performance to ondemand each time after I
Hi,
I am able to use the 2.6 kernel ondemand cpufreq governor, but I just
noticed that I have to do 'modprobe powernow-k8' and change the cpufreq
governor from performance to ondemand each time after I reboot.
What's the Debian way to enable ondemand cpufreq governor by defau
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 18:10 -0300, gusti wrote:
> but I still can't use 'cpufreq-info', see below:
> cpufrequtils 002: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2006
> Report errors and bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED], please.
> analyzing CPU 0:
>
Hello
I tried to active the cpufreq tools, but I did not success, :-(.
I already write in the file '/etc/modules' the cpufreq modules, there are:
cpufreq_userspace
cpufreq_conservative
cpufreq_powersave
cpufreq_ondemand
cpufreq_stats
freq_ta
FORMANCE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_24_API is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=y
#
# CPUFreq processor drivers
#
CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=y
# CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF is not set
# CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K6 is not set
# CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K7 is not set
CONFIG_X86_POW
> > I guess that by vanilla is meant the original source,
> > i.e., not the one effectivelly distributed through the kernel-package ?
> That's how kernel-source from kernel.org is called, and not the one already
> patched by Debian (the one you can download using apt-get) ;)
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 18:27, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> is there a patch for the source-kernel-2.4.22
> as distributed in Sarge to incoporate the `cpufreq' stuff ?
>
> Thanks,
> Jerome
If I am not mistake, there is no official patch. You will need to either
e effectivelly distributed through the kernel-package ?
That's how kernel-source from kernel.org is called, and not the one already
patched by Debian (the one you can download using apt-get) ;)
I still need to have both cpufreq & swsusp patches working together 8-(
Bye! ;)
- --
Jo
Thank for your reply !
Joan Tur wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Es Dijous 25 Setembre 2003 19:00, en Jerome BENOIT va escriure:
Hello List,
is there a patch for the source-kernel-2.4.22
as distributed in Sarge to incoporate the `cpufreq' stuff ?
I've succeeded
Hello List,
is there a patch for the source-kernel-2.4.22
as distributed in Sarge to incoporate the `cpufreq' stuff ?
Thanks,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Es Dijous 25 Setembre 2003 19:00, en Jerome BENOIT va escriure:
> Hello List,
>
> is there a patch for the source-kernel-2.4.22
> as distributed in Sarge to incoporate the `cpufreq' stuff ?
I've succeeded installing patch-2
Hello List,
is there a patch for the source-kernel-2.4.22
as distributed in Sarge to incoporate the `cpufreq' stuff ?
Thanks,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59 matches
Mail list logo
