On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:01:07 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:52:13 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
(...)
>> No, I think this has nothing to do with the router. Just look at Adam's
>> traceroute when using "-I" (without "-z"):
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:52:13 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message
:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:29:25 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:22:26 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
>
> >> >> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed?
> >> >
> >> > ..
Camaleón on 26/10/10 16:52, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:29:25 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:22:26 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed?
..too big load on that hop?
Could slow it too much for our demand
In , Camaleón wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:29:25 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:22:26 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
>>> >> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed?
>
>No, I think this has nothing to do with the router. Just look at Adam's
>t
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:29:25 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:22:26 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
>> >> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed?
>> >
>> > ..too big load on that hop?
>> >
>> > Could slow it too much for our demands. What kinda
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:22:26 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message
:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:59:49 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:31:41 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
> >
> >> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed?
> >
> > ..too bi
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:59:49 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:31:41 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
>
>> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed?
>
> ..too big load on that hop?
>
> Could slow it too much for our demands.
> What kinda iron _
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:31:41 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message
:
> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed?
..too big load on that hop? Could slow it too much for our
demands. What kinda iron _is_ that hop, some kinda switch?
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:58:40 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Camaleón on 26/10/10 07:04, wrote:
>>> I didn't mean linux traceroute was quirky in execution - I just meant
>>> the options were not ideal for me. The dumbed-down version on windows
>>> was just right for my abilities and knowledge and what
Camaleón on 26/10/10 07:04, wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:37:44 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 25/10/10 11:04, wrote:
Seriously slightly quirky, but now it's better than windows again,
which is the way it should be.
The only thing it could make a difference between Windows "tracert" a
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:37:44 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Camaleón on 25/10/10 11:04, wrote:
>>> Seriously slightly quirky, but now it's better than windows again,
>>> which is the way it should be.
>>
>> The only thing it could make a difference between Windows "tracert" and
>> Linux "traceroute"
Camaleón on 25/10/10 11:04, wrote:
The potion can be improved to get a closer mimic of the windows "tracert":
traceroute -I -z 500 mktgw1.ibllc.com
(1 second generates much delay, by reducing to 500ms we can leave the 3
stantard queries without hassle)
Seriously slightly quirky, but now it'
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:25:13 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Camaleón on 25/10/10 07:51, wrote:
>> I come with additional magic (it's just a matter of playing with
>> traceroute modifiers):
>>
>> traceroute -I -z 1 -q 1 mktgw1.ibllc.com
>
> That is the final incantation that does everything. The sor
Camaleón on 25/10/10 07:51, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:54:51 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 24/10/10 21:21, wrote:
(...)
Okay, okay... let's add more magic:
traceroute -I -n mktgw1.ibllc.com
No name resolve but all the hosts are there (and is very quick) :-)
Haha! You can guess
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:54:51 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Camaleón on 24/10/10 21:21, wrote:
>> (...)
>>
>> Okay, okay... let's add more magic:
>>
>> traceroute -I -n mktgw1.ibllc.com
>>
>> No name resolve but all the hosts are there (and is very quick) :-)
>
> Haha! You can guess what I'm goin
Ron Johnson on 24/10/10 22:56, wrote:
On 10/24/2010 03:54 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 24/10/10 21:21, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:30:51 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 24/10/10 19:50, wrote:
The "magic" is done when using "-I" flag.
Try:
traceroute -I mktgw1.ibllc.com
I pla
On 10/24/2010 03:54 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 24/10/10 21:21, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:30:51 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 24/10/10 19:50, wrote:
The "magic" is done when using "-I" flag.
Try:
traceroute -I mktgw1.ibllc.com
I played around with -I and -T and didn't ge
Ron Johnson on 24/10/10 21:55, wrote:
On 10/24/2010 02:30 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 24/10/10 19:50, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:40:28 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I asked this before in a thread but the thread just sort of skirting
around it - basically what is the ping option to get th
On 10/24/2010 02:30 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 24/10/10 19:50, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:40:28 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I asked this before in a thread but the thread just sort of skirting
around it - basically what is the ping option to get the last hop to
show up doing ping on len
Camaleón on 24/10/10 21:21, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:30:51 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
Camaleón on 24/10/10 19:50, wrote:
The "magic" is done when using "-I" flag.
Try:
traceroute -I mktgw1.ibllc.com
I played around with -I and -T and didn't get any better results, which
is why I though
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:30:51 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Camaleón on 24/10/10 19:50, wrote:
>> The "magic" is done when using "-I" flag.
>>
>> Try:
>>
>> traceroute -I mktgw1.ibllc.com
>
> I played around with -I and -T and didn't get any better results, which
> is why I thought it must be som
Camaleón on 24/10/10 19:50, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:40:28 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I asked this before in a thread but the thread just sort of skirting
around it - basically what is the ping option to get the last hop to
show up doing ping on lenny, compared to the ping from the LAN on a
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:40:28 +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> I asked this before in a thread but the thread just sort of skirting
> around it - basically what is the ping option to get the last hop to
> show up doing ping on lenny, compared to the ping from the LAN on a
> windows box?
(...)
The "magi
I asked this before in a thread but the thread just sort of skirting around it -
basically what is the ping option to get the last hop to show up doing ping on
lenny, compared to the ping from the LAN on a windows box?
This is what I mean:
a...@isengard:~/tmp$ sudo traceroute mktgw1.ibllc.com
24 matches
Mail list logo
