On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:29:25 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:22:26 +0000 (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message:
>> >> Now hop 2 is identified. Question is "why" is that pause needed? >> > >> > ..too big load on that hop? >> > >> > Could slow it too much for our demands. What kinda iron _is_ that >> > hop, some kinda switch? >> >> Hop 2 is a modem-router (DSL Nokia M1122). > > ..uhuh, the "In addition to its main task, the M1122 is capable of > acting as a 10 Mbit/s hub in a local area network." part in [1] might > help explain its glacial response. Smoke test it. ;o) 1: > http://www.blurbwire.com/topics/Nokia_M1122 Yes, but the windows computer is using the same "10 Mbit oldie" hardware as gateway and presents no problems with it :-) No, I think this has nothing to do with the router. Just look at Adam's traceroute when using "-I" (without "-z"): http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2010/10/msg01565.html Different hardware (I suppose Adam is not using the old Nokia DSL router), same behaviour. Some hops are lost (timed out) unless "-z" is specified when runned on linux hosts (on windows systems is not needed). So what can make the difference? Iptables? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.10.26.15.52...@gmail.com
