Yes if you want uptodate (sometimes called bleeding-edge) softwares, it's
better to upgrade to sid.
I would be easier for you and in the same time you contribute to the early
testing effort.
IMHO testing (woody) is for woody testing. If you polute too much your
woody with sid package, you are not r
on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:14:00PM -0400, Jeff Maxson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> ok, the hoopla about galeon has got me wanting to try it. I'm running
> woody, so I commented out my woody lines in my sources.list and put in
>
> deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-fre
On 23 Aug 2001 22:14:00 -0400, Jeff Maxson wrote:
>
> ok, the hoopla about galeon has got me wanting to try it. I'm running
> woody, so I commented out my woody lines in my sources.list and put in
>
> deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
>
> so that is the only thin
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:14:00PM -0400, Jeff Maxson wrote:
>
> ok, the hoopla about galeon has got me wanting to try it. I'm running
> woody, so I commented out my woody lines in my sources.list and put in
>
> deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
>
> so that is th
ok, the hoopla about galeon has got me wanting to try it. I'm running
woody, so I commented out my woody lines in my sources.list and put in
deb ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
so that is the only thing in there. I then did an
apt-get update
which did its thing
5 matches
Mail list logo