Re: apt-get & firewall

2001-11-05 Thread Pontus Edvardsson
Thanks! I must have missed it... :-/ I'll read it again. //Pontus - Original Message - From: "Stephen Gran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:15 PM Subject: Re: apt-get & firewall

Re: apt-get & firewall

2001-11-05 Thread Stephen Gran
Thus spake Davi Leal: > > Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > > I've followed the discussion, but, what if you have a proxy between > the > > client and firewall? Is it possible to have APT-GET log on the proxy? > > I have not any idea. :-( > > Davi man apt.conf. Proxy issues and how to resolve them are

RE: apt-get & firewall

2001-11-05 Thread Davi Leal
> Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > I've followed the discussion, but, what if you have a proxy between the > client and firewall? Is it possible to have APT-GET log on the proxy? I have not any idea. :-( Davi > From: "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 O

Re: apt-get & firewall

2001-11-03 Thread Pontus Edvardsson
I've followed the discussion, but, what if you have a proxy between the client and firewall? Is it possible to have APT-GET log on the proxy? - Original Message - From: "Davi Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:08 PM Subject: RE: apt-ge

RE: apt-get & firewall

2001-10-31 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Davi Leal wrote: > The X.X.X.5 host is behind the firewall. Why pointing apt-get to > ftp.de.debian.org raises a "Connection time out" message after > Login-Connecting successfully?. The "Packages" file is not downloaded ftp.de.d.o has been flaky for me for as long as I remem

RE: apt-get & firewall

2001-10-31 Thread Davi Leal
Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Frederico.S.Muñoz wrote: > > AFAIK either the HTTP, the FTP, or both; it depends on what you define in > > your sources.line. > > > > If you only define http sites you would only need the http port open, the > > same with the ftp. > > 2 things: > >

Re: apt-get & firewall

2001-10-30 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
[Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 06:02:09PM +0100] Davi Leal : > What ports must be opened in the firewall so that the machine behind it > is able to use "apt-get" to realize an 'dist-upgrade'?. That depends on the apt-get method you have specified inside your /etc/apt/sources.list. Ports to let th

RE: apt-get & firewall

2001-10-30 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Frederico.S.Muñoz wrote: > AFAIK either the HTTP, the FTP, or both; it depends on what you define in > your sources.line. > > If you only define http sites you would only need the http port open, the > same with the ftp. 2 things: 1) If you're blocking connections anal reten

RE: apt-get & firewall

2001-10-30 Thread Frederico . S . Muñoz
> > > What ports must be opened in the firewall so that the machine > > > behind it > > > is able to use "apt-get" to realize an 'dist-upgrade'?. > > > > > > Davi > > > > AFAIK either the HTTP, the FTP, or both; it depends on what > you define in > > your sources.line. > > > > If you only define

Re: apt-get & firewall

2001-10-30 Thread Johnny Ernst Nielsen
> > What ports must be opened in the firewall so that the machine > > behind it > > is able to use "apt-get" to realize an 'dist-upgrade'?. > > > > Davi > > AFAIK either the HTTP, the FTP, or both; it depends on what you define in > your sources.line. > > If you only define http sites you would onl

RE: apt-get & firewall

2001-10-30 Thread Frederico . S . Muñoz
> What ports must be opened in the firewall so that the machine > behind it > is able to use "apt-get" to realize an 'dist-upgrade'?. > > Davi > AFAIK either the HTTP, the FTP, or both; it depends on what you define in your sources.line. If you only define http sites you would only need the

apt-get & firewall

2001-10-30 Thread Davi Leal
What ports must be opened in the firewall so that the machine behind it is able to use "apt-get" to realize an 'dist-upgrade'?. Davi