Not too long ago, I made a statement like "64 GB should be enough for anybody
;-)" (when talking about a new Lenovo micro computer).
It turns out I was wrong, Over on the "Libre-Soc General Development" maillist (where they are working on building a
new basically "open source" microprocessor,
Meanwhile, my MSI Z87-43G motherboard boot screen doesn't display unless I
>
>> use the built-in graphics card. When I use my Radeon R9 270X it just goes
>> blank, but still boots through to the default first grub menu item. 4K
>>
>
> Goes blank when exactly? Do kernel and initrd load first? Do you
Catherine Gramze composed on 2017-03-13 15:35 (UTC-0400):
Meanwhile, my MSI Z87-43G motherboard boot screen doesn't display unless I
use the built-in graphics card. When I use my Radeon R9 270X it just goes
blank, but still boots through to the default first grub menu item. 4K
Goes blank when
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Rob van der Putten wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
>
>> On 13/03/17 15:54, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>>
>> Out of my frustration and lack of understanding, or the belief that all
>> systems should run as trouble-free as clean-debian, and possibly due to
>> ju
Hi there
On 13/03/17 15:54, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
Out of my frustration and lack of understanding, or the belief that all
systems should run as trouble-free as clean-debian, and possibly due to
just getting tired of fighting something too long, I bad-mouthed
siduction in public.
My source of fru
Out of my frustration and lack of understanding, or the belief that all
systems should run as trouble-free as clean-debian, and possibly due to
just getting tired of fighting something too long, I bad-mouthed
siduction in public.
My source of frustration came from fighting an installation in a tir
I appear to have sent multiple drafts of my message about pan
newsreader to the list. Only the last one is complete.
I apologise - don't know how it happened but I was using icedove for
the first time.
Mea culpa
D2
On 31/12/2013 17:37, Howard wrote:
More info: existing partition
The existing partition would be from our 'filesystem backup' machine,
[snip]
suggestion of creating a new empty LVM might work, otherwise.
regards, Ron
Tst.
Apologies to the list for posting this message using the wrong n
Lisi Reisz wrote:
It has been drawn to my attention off list that I am wrong ...
NOT TO WORRY
If I took myself too seriously I've siblings {and friends}
who would resolve issue ;/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Friday 01 March 2013 08:33:41 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Thirdly, I didn't notice yesterday, but he is not even telling the truth.
> He cannot both be around 70 (he usually says he is approaching 70) and
> have worked on/with punched cards in 1949. (Do the arithmetic.)
It has been drawn to my attent
On Monday 26 September 2011 17:28:22 you wrote:
> Thanks, Francis - but David had und
Sorry Andrew. I had just been emailing a David on the Trinity list. I know
perfectly well that you are Andrew, and thought as I clicked on the send
button - oh dear, I have a horrible idea that I typed David
On Vi, 29 apr 11, 23:11:34, chris wrote:
> >
> this is so far off topic and its not the first time, enough already
Just report it as SPAM[1] and delete it... oups, too late. You already
replied to it AND quoted it in full. Now it's impossible to clean it
from the archives :(
[1] bounce/redirect
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:34 PM, "Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang
Enming) 张恩鸣 " wrote:
> I was misconstrued as having insulted Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew. My
> words were twisted and misinterpreted and I feel that there is a need to
> explain myself and set the record straight.
>
> [b
On 06/15/2010 05:02 PM, Lisi wrote:
Sorry for duplicate everybody. The list has been rejecting my emails with my
usual SMTP set up. This means that I may think that something has gone when
it hasn't or vice versa.
Something like that happened to me a year or so ago when my ISP got
much stri
Sorry for duplicate everybody. The list has been rejecting my emails with my
usual SMTP set up. This means that I may think that something has gone when
it hasn't or vice versa.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Sorry everyone
That "be sure" remark was pretty stupid. I guess I've been burned in the
past with inane answers. Thanks for the help. It really is appreciated.
You are correct, I don't understand backporting. I read the debian site
that defined the term but didn't see any additional help. I'l
On Thursday 21 May 2009 22:44:50 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009 11:08:52 Long Wind wrote:
> > I have try gimp for sarge
> > It seems to have problem with capturing window
> > I have tried scrot for etch
> > It does not capture title bar when capturing window
> > Thanks!
>
> Ksnapshot
Dear Debian List:
I'd like to apologize, first to all the users of the list and then to
those who tried to help me with my spam (the "dirty spam") problem such
as Roberto C. Sanchez and P. Johnson. I sincerely apologize for not
being understanding of their suggestions and for being not being
Am 2006-08-18 05:22:12, schrieb Mumia W.:
> Sorry Michelle.
Oh...
> It's too bad this isn't a news-server that supports cancels
> because I would've canceled my post.
>
> We all contribute in our own ways with the resources we have.
> You are in the military; you don't have the freedom to do
On 08/11/2006 12:42 PM, Mumia W. wrote:
On 07/30/2006 03:39 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
LOCATION=$(dirname $(readlink /proc/$$/exe))
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
Michelle Konzack, it's August 11, 2006, and yo
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 05:59:58AM -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote:
> Dear friends:
>
> My apology for double posting of my message concerning my printer issue.
> I sent the first message by mistake from my first email address
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). This is not my Debian address
Dear friends:
My apology for double posting of my message concerning my printer issue.
I sent the first message by mistake from my first email address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). This is not my Debian address, and I assumed
that it would be bounced back to me as they always are. So, I resent it
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 23:30, Mark Healey wrote:
> I've been having quite a bit of trouble getting a debian system
> installed. Because it wasn't nearly as easy as I was told I've been
> getting quite petulant and taken it out on people who've been nothing
> but helpful.
If you want a "smoother" D
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:30:00PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
> I've been having quite a bit of trouble getting a debian system
> installed. Because it wasn't nearly as easy as I was told I've been
> getting quite petulant and taken it out on people who've been nothing
> but helpful.
I understand
I've been having quite a bit of trouble getting a debian system
installed. Because it wasn't nearly as easy as I was told I've been
getting quite petulant and taken it out on people who've been nothing
but helpful.
I am sorry.
Mark Healey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giving debian a chance.
--
To UNS
I apologise for the wrong subject line. Actually I planned to ask
about chattr and was interrupted while composing the email.
Maybe I must ask my intended question here: Is there a way to do to a
symlink what "chattr -i" does to a normal file or directory?
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 09:21:09PM -0700, Allen Wayne Best wrote:
> i owe everyone on the list a very big apology, i'll bet. it appears that a
> large number of messages from the list sent to my address got resent to the
> list.
>
> my isp this week has changed everyth
hello:
i owe everyone on the list a very big apology, i'll bet. it appears that a
large number of messages from the list sent to my address got resent to the
list.
my isp this week has changed everything i have with them, including my mail
service and caused me havoc. and now, y
* Mike Pfleger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't know about anyone else, but after the second innappropriate
> posting by this individual,
Errr... just to clarify, by "individual" I meant the originator of this
thread, not Craig. I thought this was clear; but on re-reading, it
seemed like it
* Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> No hard feelings. One thing, though, is that I've seen you write
> intemperate messages on other occasions, too, most recently on the ext3
> mailing list.
I don't know about anyone else, but after the second innappropriate
posting by this individual,
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> I'm sorry to have sent my rant about /tmp on Saturday. It wasn't
> appropriate for the list and it also wasn't any fault except my own that I
> didn't understand the differences between Debian and my usual system. I
> was very upset to have had my machine crash, then de
also sprach Jeffrey W. Baker (on Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:24:25AM -0700):
> I'm sorry to have sent my rant about /tmp on Saturday. It wasn't
> appropriate for the list and it also wasn't any fault except my own that I
> didn't understand the differences between Debian and my usual system. I
> was very
I'm sorry to have sent my rant about /tmp on Saturday. It wasn't
appropriate for the list and it also wasn't any fault except my own that I
didn't understand the differences between Debian and my usual system. I
was very upset to have had my machine crash, then delete my work, but I
needn't have
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:43:49AM +0100, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> ...and let's not forget, if you're an American presidential candidate,
> then it's considered quite acceptable to publicly describe someone as "a
> major-league A**hole". In fact it probably wouldn't even stop you from
> beco
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 09:11:47PM -0500, Christopher Mosley
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > > on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 07:06:40PM -0500, Jim Kroger
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > My own comment
on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 09:11:47PM -0500, Christopher Mosley ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 07:06:40PM -0500, Jim Kroger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> >
> > My own comments to this list.
<...>
> Stop covering
afternoon.
>
> While I do accept his apology, I feel his earlier actions were beyond
> the bounds of good taste.
>
> I think it would also be helpful for the Debian team to review the
> factors leading up to this incident. Apparently, Dr. Kroger did
> repeatedly try to unsubsc
Karsten,
Please stop mailing the director of the center here (my boss). You
are only doing more damage.
Jim
_
James K. Kroger, Ph.D.
Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior
Department of Psychology
3-N-4D Green Hall
Princeton
I hope you understand that I did not intend this, and hope that you
> will accept my humble apology for those messages.
>
> Jim Kroger
> _
> James K. Kroger, Ph.D.
> Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior
> Dep
Apology accepted my me...
--
Christopher W. Aiken, Scenery Hill, Pa, USA
chris at cwaiken dot com, www.cwaiken.com
Current O/S: Debian 2.2 GNU/Linux
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Jim Kroger wrote:
->Dear Debian list:
->
->I recently, in unprecedented poor judgement, sent messages to th
allow us to help you to spot a mistake
either in outr mailing-list-software or in your unsubscribe emails.
> I hope you understand that I did not intend this, and hope that you
> will accept my humble apology for those messages.
I, for one, sure can understand how you came to post like t
outr mailing-list-software or in your unsubscribe emails.
> I hope you understand that I did not intend this, and hope that you
> will accept my humble apology for those messages.
I, for one, sure can understand how you came to post like that.
On the other hand, I hope you forgive us the flam
ve no desire to demean the people at Debian or those that
support and use it.
I hope you understand that I did not intend this, and hope that you
will accept my humble apology for those messages.
Jim Kroger
_
James K. Kroger, Ph.D.
Center fo
Hoi Jeremy!
Jeremy> Here, I use fetchmail to pop mail from seven POP3 accounts on
Jeremy> various providers. Fetchmail passes it off to my MTA (sendmail)
[...]
You can use popsneaker to automagically delete mail (you can specify
various criterias of course) from your pop3 account before fet
said probably won't apply. :)
HTH.
-jg
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Mike Werner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 12:56 AM
To: debianuser
Subject: Refusing mail if via ISP? [was Re: apology]
I get my ema
brian moore wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 01:55:44AM -0400, Mike Werner wrote:
> > brian moore wrote:
> >
> > > My solution is simply to refuse all mail from
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with postfix:
> > >
> > > Sep 23 16:58:25 bifur postfix/smtpd[3101]: reject: RCPT from
> > > imsmdm002.netvi
On 25-Sep-2000 brian moore wrote:
>
> Only if you have root on their mail server. :)
>
> You -could- do something similar with procmail, but it's really not the
> same effect.
I do it with Exim on my DSL connection. Is Postfix as easy to configure as
Exim?
--
Andrew
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 01:55:44AM -0400, Mike Werner wrote:
> brian moore wrote:
>
> > My solution is simply to refuse all mail from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with postfix:
> >
> > Sep 23 16:58:25 bifur postfix/smtpd[3101]: reject: RCPT from
> > imsmdm002.netvigator.com[208.167.231.173]: 550
> >
brian moore wrote:
> My solution is simply to refuse all mail from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with postfix:
>
> Sep 23 16:58:25 bifur postfix/smtpd[3101]: reject: RCPT from
> imsmdm002.netvigator.com[208.167.231.173]: 550
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address rejected: Learn how SMTP
> works
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 05:33:33PM -0700, DMGrant wrote:
> I want to apologize for the repeated postings earlier today.
> I had no idea that it was being delivered to anyone.
> It just kept coming back to me as undeliverable.
> Judging from the amount of nasty emails I have gotten, it would seem th
I want to apologize for the repeated postings earlier today.
I had no idea that it was being delivered to anyone.
It just kept coming back to me as undeliverable.
Judging from the amount of nasty emails I have gotten, it would seem that
perhaps
someone ought to fix that problem so that people like
>sorry, I hadn't seen the FAQ section on error 111 which basically equates
>to "the server caused an error but I'm damned if I know what it actually was"
>
>tks
>
>Andrew
>
>
I apologize for the long signature on my previous message about
python-pygresql. I did not realize that it was that long.
--
| Johann Spies Windsorlaan 19 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I apologize for my home page announcement yesterday on this List.
Helmut
I welcome you at my new home page:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Hallelujah/
Hi,
On re-reading what I had written, yes, it could be interpreted
as I would find releasing all the packages each time unaccpetable.
That was not what I meant to convey. I would find relasing
weach one individually unacceptable. But if I could do it in
one go, it would be fine
It's OK. Some messages are _so_ dumb that they almost _require_ a snappy
answer. Of course no user questions fall into this category.
Thanks
Bruce
--
Can you get your operating system fixed when you need it?
Linux - the supportable operating system. http://www.debian.org/support.
In a fit of pique I added to the spam on this list regarding
a misplaced question that did not belong here. I immediately
realized my reply might result in a further inquiry to the
list. I hereby apologise to the list and will not post
unappropriate and off-topic replies in the future.
Best Re
Debians,
just a quick apology for sending my question about Wave twice. The
first I sent went through my Windows NT mail server at work. The
server is usually 90% of the times down, and even local mail arrived
2 days late.
My second request went through my Linux provider
Apologies. I found the variable DESTDIR in "rules". But I still do not
know what to do with it.
When I tried to run "rules" the message
"test -f debian/rules
make: *** [build] Error 1"
came up.
I do not know what do do next.
Johann.
Johann Spi
Dear Fellow Debianers,
My apology is directed to my 2 previous postings. It was a mistake
that they were sent to this list. This will not happen again.
-Rob
Sorry about today's mailing list mess-up. It started because of some
confusion about the management reorganization (I am delegating most of
the project management to two other people), and escalated into permissions
being shut off, servers being moved, and a three-hour search for a broken
configura
First an apology.
Some of us, at least myself, don't like to be confronted with our
stupidity. Why I choose to advertize it, then, is another question.
On Tue, 18 Feb 1997, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> I apologize if you took my citing of the man page as RTFM. Please attribute it
>
I apologize for having sent that huge uuencoded gif to the list; it
never even occurred to me to check the size of the file.
The jest perhaps would have been met with more appreciation had I
cropped the .gif down to the small section showing the 'bleck' faces
in the printcap file.
I'll never
63 matches
Mail list logo
