Re: Zoom

On 1/31/25 23:13, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: I just wanted to dispell the impression that "there's no choice". That's what a commercial entity's marketing department wants you to believe -- after all, they get paid for that. As another encouraging datapoint, there's Senfcall [0], a not for profit s

Re: Zoom

On 1/31/25 01:50, Hans wrote: Hi folks, I am following this discussion here with great interest. We all know, that Zoom is not quite secure and we all know, that our data are transferred int the US (where they probably will be processed further on). Thus, many alternatives were mentioned

Re: Zoom

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:26:45PM -0800, D MacDougall wrote: > On 1/31/25 02:46, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > Thing is -- you always have some. Use it. Sometimes it's direct, > > sometimes via advocacy groups, the best being to combine both. > ... > > Most of the time, the "normal" size is 30s to 4

Re: Zoom

stance (for low latency: musicians tend to care about this). That's just in our small town. Cheers That's very interesting, thanks for the info. The only thing I have any experience with is Zoom.  I've only used it because I needed to.  I wouldn't recommend anything to other

Re: Zoom

Defaetism is your enemy's sharpest weapon. > In fact it likely wouldn't even be possible.  Zoom scales to 1000s of users > amazingly well [...] Most of the time, the "normal" size is 30s to 40s of users. And I have seen BBB perform surprisingly well there. Two examples

Re: Zoom

Hi folks, I am following this discussion here with great interest. We all know, that Zoom is not quite secure and we all know, that our data are transferred int the US (where they probably will be processed further on). Thus, many alternatives were mentioned like Jitsi, Jami and BBB. But I

Re: Zoom

On 1/30/25 23:33, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:02:25PM -0800, D MacDougall wrote: 4. If you want or need to join Zoom meetings that you do not control you [...] Or convince your partners to move to Jitsi. Or BBB. Sometimes that effort works out, and this is

Re: Zoom

ou go to their web site, they detect you're using Linux and ask > > which distro you're using.  I'm a little apprehensive about downloading > > from a vendor web site. Is there anyone here that's familiar  with Zoom > > on Debian? > > > > -- > >

Re: Zoom

om.If you go to their web site, they detect you're using Linux and ask > > which distro you're using.  I'm a little apprehensive about downloading > > from a vendor web site. Is there anyone here that's familiar  with Zoom > > on Debian? > > > >

Re: Zoom

7;re using.  I'm a little apprehensive about downloading from a vendor web site. Is there anyone here that's familiar  with Zoom on Debian? -- -- Greg Hi Greg and list, Greg, the original poster didn't spell out why he was contemplating installing Zoom on a Debian computer, but he di

Re: Zoom

Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Donald MacDougall wrote: I've been using Zoom from the beginning of the Corona virus epidemic [...] and haven't had any trouble that I think could be related to Zoom [...] Thanks for your report. Prompted by this thread I went to the Wikipedia. Af

Re: Zoom

On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 09:07 Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote: > On Thursday 30 January 2025 09:11:16 am Bret Busby wrote: > > One report that was previously cited in previous discussions of zoom on > > this list, that should have been read by people recommending zoom, is &g

Re: Zoom

On Thursday 30 January 2025 09:11:16 am Bret Busby wrote: > One report that was previously cited in previous discussions of zoom on > this list, that should have been read by people recommending zoom, is > the report at > https://www.theregister.com/2023/0/15/software_freedom_cons

Re: Zoom

On Thu 30 Jan 2025 at 22:11:16 (+0800), Bret Busby wrote: > As I have previously said, the issue of zoom was previously discussed > on this list, and, people interested in considering zoom, should have > searched the list archive, and, found previous discussions relating to > zoom. >

Re: Zoom

On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 07:38 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 07:05:32 +1100, George at Clug wrote: > > Is there a way to search for "zoom" in some debian-user archive? > > Google accepts "site:lists.debian.org" in its search box. > >

Re: Zoom

On Fri 31 Jan 2025 at 07:05:32 (+1100), George at Clug wrote: > Is there a way to search for "zoom" in some debian-user archive? > > I found https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ ? But I am way to lazy to > search through all those pages looking to see if at an

Re: Zoom

..@tuxteam.de wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Donald MacDougall wrote: > >>>>> I've been using Zoom from the beginning of the Corona virus epidemic > >>>>> [...] > >>>>> and haven't had any trouble t

Re: Zoom

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 07:05:32 +1100, George at Clug wrote: > Is there a way to search for "zoom" in some debian-user archive? Google accepts "site:lists.debian.org" in its search box. Using this gives you a URL like <https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Alists

Re: Zoom

Jami looks very useful. Thanks for mentioning this program. On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 02:52 Charles Curley wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 01:44:28 -0800 > D MacDougall wrote: > > > The Wikipedia article on Jitsi > > says that due to it's hosting on AWS Jitsi is not GDPR compliant.  Do > > you or

Re: Zoom

On 31/1/25 04:05, George at Clug wrote: On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 01:11 Bret Busby wrote: On 30/1/25 17:44, D MacDougall wrote: On 1/29/25 21:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Donald MacDougall wrote: I've been using Zoom from the beginning of the C

Re: Zoom

On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 01:11 Bret Busby wrote: > On 30/1/25 17:44, D MacDougall wrote: > > On 1/29/25 21:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Donald MacDougall wrote: > >>> I've been using Zoom from the beg

Re: Zoom

On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 01:44:28 -0800 D MacDougall wrote: > The Wikipedia article on Jitsi > says that due to it's hosting on AWS Jitsi is not GDPR compliant.  Do > you or anyone have alternative that can be said with confidence to be > better? Jami is package in Debian and does not use a centra

Re: Zoom

D MacDougall wrote: > From only the Wikipedia report and no further reading it's not clear to me > whether using a web browser to attend a zoom meeting would be any safer than > using the native application and I'm not doing international diplomatic > negotiations anyway. 

Re: Zoom

On 30/1/25 17:44, D MacDougall wrote: On 1/29/25 21:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Donald MacDougall wrote: I've been using Zoom from the beginning of the Corona virus epidemic [...] and haven't had any trouble that I think could be relat

Re: Zoom

On 1/29/25 21:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Donald MacDougall wrote: I've been using Zoom from the beginning of the Corona virus epidemic [...] and haven't had any trouble that I think could be related to Zoom [...] Thanks for your report. P

Re: Zoom

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Donald MacDougall wrote: > I've been using Zoom from the beginning of the Corona virus epidemic [...] > and haven't had any trouble that I think could be related to Zoom [...] Thanks for your report. Prompted by this thread I went to the W

Re: Zoom

I've been using Zoom from the beginning of the Corona virus epidemic on a couple of Debian computers as well as a couple of Android phones and have found them to work very well and haven't had any trouble that I think could be related to Zoom. I know there have been an incident o

Re: Zoom

ux and ask > which distro you're using. I'm a little apprehensive about downloading > from a vendor web site. Is there anyone here that's familiar with Zoom > on Debian? Related, a good alternative to Zoom and Teams is Jitsi, <https://jitsi.org/>. Jeff

Re: Zoom

Steve Witt wrote: [...] > I have had no problems with it and it did not > affect those computers in any way so I believe that it is totally safe > to install it and use it. [...] No, isn't totally safe on Linux, for instance see: https://cybersecuritynews.com/zoom-app-vulner

Re: Zoom

7;re using.  I'm a little apprehensive about downloading from a vendor web site. Is there anyone here that's familiar  with Zoom on Debian? I believe that zoom has previously been discussed on this list (if you can search the list archive, you should be able to find previous discuss

Re: Zoom

Linux and ask which distro you're using.  I'm a little apprehensive about downloading from a vendor web site. Is there anyone here that's familiar  with Zoom on Debian? -- -- Greg I started using the Zoom application on Debian systems at the beginning of the pandemic, as many people

Re: Zoom

> you're using.  I'm a little apprehensive about downloading from a vendor web > site. Is there anyone here that's familiar  with Zoom on Debian? > > -- > -- Greg > I started using the Zoom application on Debian systems at the beginning of the pandemic, as many peopl

Re: Zoom

;re using.  I'm a little apprehensive about downloading from a vendor web > site. Is there anyone here that's familiar  with Zoom on Debian? Yes. If you use the web browser to go to a Zoom meeting URL and ignore the "please install our spyware", it will eventually have a li

Re: Zoom

I've had to use Zoom (and others) since the pandemic, on Debian based systems. For zoom, I usually connect through the browser (there's usually a not emphasised link somewhere on the zoom web page) and it works quite well typically. I have used the application but found it worked

Zoom

sive about downloading from a vendor web site. Is there anyone here that's familiar  with Zoom on Debian? -- -- Greg

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

list) >> >> >> Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to login to Zoom >> >> meetings using the client installed from the Debian repos. In order to >> >> join meetings, I had to uninstall it then install the flatpack Zoom package. >> >&

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

On 25/4/24 08:13, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Related, if you control the venue, then you might consider using Jitsi. Jitsi is open source, and it does not have the obscene terms of service that companies like Google, Microsoft and Zoom push onto people using their service. With Jitsi, your

Note this thread Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

On April 24, 2024 1:00:29 PM Luiz Romário Santana Rios wrote: Hello, (Please cc me when replying as I'm not subscribed to the list) Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to login to Zoom meetings using the client installed from the Debian repos. In order to join meetin

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 7:13 PM Van Snyder wrote: > On Wed, 2024-04-24 at 16:42 -0300, Luiz Romário Santana Rios wrote: > > Hello, > > > (Please cc me when replying as I'm not subscribed to the list) > > > Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to logi

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

On 4/24/24 01:28 PM, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 24 Apr 2024 16:42 -0300, from luizroma...@tecgraf.puc-rio.br (Luiz Romário Santana Rios): Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to login to Zoom meetings using the client installed from the Debian repos. In order to join meetings, I

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

On Mittwoch, 24. April 2024 15:42:39 -04 Luiz Romário Santana Rios wrote: > Hello, > > (Please cc me when replying as I'm not subscribed to the list) > > Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to login to Zoom > meetings using the client installed from the De

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

I forgot I had installed zoom from the official zoom deb package, not from the Debian repo. And, as it turns out, they provide just the deb package[1], not a repo where the push updates, so I'd have to manually download the new deb package in order to update Zoom. Whoops... Sorry fo

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

On 24 Apr 2024 16:42 -0300, from luizroma...@tecgraf.puc-rio.br (Luiz Romário Santana Rios): > Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to login to Zoom meetings > using the client installed from the Debian repos. In order to join meetings, > I had to uninstall it then in

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

Luiz Romário Santana Rios wrote: > Hello, > > (Please cc me when replying as I'm not subscribed to the list) > > Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to login to Zoom meetings > using the client installed from the Debian repos. In order to join meetings,

Re: Zoom in the official repo is outdated

On Wed, 2024-04-24 at 16:42 -0300, Luiz Romário Santana Rios wrote: > Hello, > > (Please cc me when replying as I'm not subscribed to the list) > > Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to login to Zoom > meetings using the client installed from the De

Zoom in the official repo is outdated

Hello, (Please cc me when replying as I'm not subscribed to the list) Earlier this month, I noticed I was no longer able to login to Zoom meetings using the client installed from the Debian repos. In order to join meetings, I had to uninstall it then install the flatpack Zoom package

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 20:57 -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 18:30:55 -0500 > Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > Use Jitsi, if possible. You can even run your own Jitsi server, if > > desired. And it is open source. . > > You might also look at Jami, which has the

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 18:30:55 -0500 Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Use Jitsi, if possible. You can even run your own Jitsi server, if > desired. And it is open source. . You might also look at Jami, which has the virtue of being in the Debian repos. apt show jami-daemon -- Does an

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:29 AM Bret Busby wrote: > > On 19/12/23 17:53, John Conover wrote: > > Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? > > > Are you aware of Zoom using video calls for spying on, and, collecting > personal information from, users, causing &

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On 12/19/23 02:53, John Conover wrote: Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? Zoom works fine on Bookworm using mainstream Logitech camera/microphone. It coexists with pipewire on the system where I use it, but does not show that as a dependency. Installing it will drag in

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:30 PM Kent West wrote: > > > On 12/19/23 10:53, John Conover wrote: >> > Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > John >> > > Yes. > > I have ver

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On 12/19/23 10:53, John Conover wrote: > > Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > Yes. I have version 5.17.0 of the desktop client running on my sid/trixie box at this very moment. -- Kent West

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On 12/19/23 10:53, John Conover wrote: Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? Thanks, John you can use zoom.us in your web browser there is less options, but it work well.

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 11:04, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > can we efficiently jail zoom ? Hi, my approach is to do that on my laptop by using grub to boot into various different Debian installations. Multiboot is un-fashionable, but I find it useful and versatile. Hard drives are plenty big eno

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

Jerome BENOIT wrote: > can we efficiently jail zoom ? It needs access to a microphone, camera, and the network. I suppose you could call that a jail, but for programs, that's pretty much everything except filesystems and root privileges. -dsr-

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

Hi, can we efficiently jail zoom ? Jerome On 19/12/2023 11:28, Bret Busby wrote: On 19/12/23 17:53, John Conover wrote: Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? Thanks, John Are you aware of Zoom using video calls for spying on, and, collecting personal information

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 06:28:48PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: [...] > Are you aware of Zoom using video calls for spying on, and, collecting > personal information from, users, causing Thanks for pointing that out. It can't be overstated. Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On 19/12/23 18:28, Bret Busby wrote: On 19/12/23 17:53, John Conover wrote: Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? Thanks, John Are you aware of Zoom using video calls for spying on, and, collecting personal information from, users, causing "The Software Fr

Re: Zoom on Bookworm?

On 19/12/23 17:53, John Conover wrote: Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? Thanks, John Are you aware of Zoom using video calls for spying on, and, collecting personal information from, users, causing "The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) is calli

Zoom on Bookworm?

Does the Zoom client work on Bookworm with pipewire? Thanks, John -- John Conover, cono...@panix.com, http://www.johncon.com/

Re: how to install zoom for bullseye for i386

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 10:07:23PM -0400, lou wrote: > > it seems i have solved it with 'apt --fix-broken install' That's one way, yes. The other way would be to use "apt install ./zoom*.deb" instead of "dpkg -i zoom*.deb".

Re: how to install zoom for bullseye for i386

it seems i have solved it with 'apt --fix-broken install' Thanks anyway!

how to install zoom for bullseye for i386

i download  zoom_i386.deb from zoom.us and run dpkg -i: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of zoom:  zoom depends on libgl1-mesa-glx; however:   Package libgl1-mesa-glx is not installed.  zoom depends on libegl1-mesa; however:   Package libegl1-mesa is not installed.  zoom depends

Re: camera detection with the Zoom client

On 2021-09-21 09:50:37 +0100, piorunz wrote: > firejail is blocking access to USB devices or other peripherals by > default, correct? Well, not in Debian 11 (bullseye), but this is now the intent with the current version in Debian/unstable, and I wasn't aware of this (no announce in Debian's NEWS

Re: camera detection with the Zoom client

On 21/09/2021 09:37, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2021-09-21 10:15:03 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: A few months ago, my webcam could be detected by the Zoom client. But this is no longer the case. When trying the zoom test meeting, I can't select any camera (I get "All cameras have b

Re: camera detection with the Zoom client

On 2021-09-21 10:37:39 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Hmm... I'm using firejail, and there is the same issue with cheese. > Thus this seems to be a regression in firejail. However, using firejail with --profile=zoom solves the issue. But I wonder why this is needed. -- Vincent Lef

Re: camera detection with the Zoom client

On 2021-09-21 10:15:03 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > A few months ago, my webcam could be detected by the Zoom client. > But this is no longer the case. When trying the zoom test meeting, > I can't select any camera (I get "All cameras have been tested" / > "Sel

camera detection with the Zoom client

A few months ago, my webcam could be detected by the Zoom client. But this is no longer the case. When trying the zoom test meeting, I can't select any camera (I get "All cameras have been tested" / "Select Camera" / "Tested 0/0"), and after going to the next t

Re: zoom client for bullseye

really care about > bandwidth, permission to run and storage size. It will be the last > options for me. I use the Flatpak for Zoom. It works fine, and since there's no .deb repo, with the Flatpak I get updates. Since I very seldomly use Zoom, it was always out of date when I did start it, so I'm happy to have the Flatpak.

Re: zoom client for bullseye

I would suggest trying a different browser: Vivaldi. It's a "fork" of chromium, with some interesting features. I.e. it solved my troubles with teams in mint 17.3; maybe not a solution, just a practical patch... Il lun 30 ago 2021 02:33 Robbi Nespu ha scritto: > Last time (that time bullseye sti

Re: zoom client for bullseye

Last time (that time bullseye still on testing release) I tried with they official deb, I getting dependencies issues too.. trying with "apt-get -f install" solve the installation but somehow when I using it, it hang...and sometimes I can't close my camera properly. Then I switched to snap ver

Re: zoom client for bullseye

On Sun 22 Aug 2021 at 14:51:17 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:47 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:37:30PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:17 -0400, Thomas George wrote: > > > > The zoom c

Re: zoom client for bullseye

On Sun 22 Aug 2021 at 14:27:12 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:17:15PM -0400, Thomas George wrote: > > The zoom client downloaded from the zoom web page seems to have been written > > for Debian 8 > > > > Installing it in bullseye fails, depen

Re: zoom client for bullseye

On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:47 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:37:30PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:17 -0400, Thomas George wrote: > > > The zoom client downloaded from the zoom web page seems to have been > >

Re: zoom client for bullseye

On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:37:30PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:17 -0400, Thomas George wrote: > > The zoom client downloaded from the zoom web page seems to have been > > written for Debian 8 > > > > Installing it in bullseye fails, dependen

Re: zoom client for bullseye

On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:17 -0400, Thomas George wrote: > The zoom client downloaded from the zoom web page seems to have been > written for Debian 8 > > Installing it in bullseye fails, dependency problems > Works for me (Deb11 + Cinnamon). IIRC, after running dpkg -i zoom.

Re: zoom client for bullseye

On 2021-08-22 2:17 p.m., Thomas George wrote: > The zoom client downloaded from the zoom web page seems to have been > written for Debian 8 > > Installing it in bullseye fails, dependency problems > What is the dependencies that fail ? It does run on Debian Buster. --

Re: zoom client for bullseye

> Installing it in bullseye fails, dependency problems Can you share the log? Or run apt -f install? On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 9:25 PM Thomas George wrote: > > The zoom client downloaded from the zoom web page seems to have been > written for Debian 8 > > Installing it

Re: zoom client for bullseye

On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:17:15PM -0400, Thomas George wrote: > The zoom client downloaded from the zoom web page seems to have been written > for Debian 8 > > Installing it in bullseye fails, dependency problems There's not much we can do about that. If you really wa

zoom client for bullseye

The zoom client downloaded from the zoom web page seems to have been written for Debian 8 Installing it in bullseye fails, dependency problems

Re: Zoom.

From: Tom Dial Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:04:45 -0600 > The link above hints that you may have a broken install. You might want > to remove (most of) it by deleting the /opt/zoom directory. Removing Zoom with aptitude also "disappeared" linphone. After removing Zoom,

Re: Zoom.

Hi all, OS debian10 amd -64 system I've been using zoom for some time and have had to reinstall twice due to system problems. I have used the "dpkg -i  install" method followed by --fix-missing clean up. Everything has worked fine both times. My only problem is with t

Re: Zoom.

On Wednesday, 21 April 2021 20:21:56 CEST Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > I just had to do this AGAIN yesterday. I download the dotDEB file then > "dpkg -i" it. It always fails due to missing dependencies. You should use gdebi. This tool checks and installs required dependencies. HTH

Re: Zoom.

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 10:08:19AM +0200, deloptes wrote: [...] > from time to time we share same POV :) ...we humans are like that >;-) Cheers - t signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Zoom.

to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > Can confirm: it's juts the other way around -- the native app has > trouble with me. I don't trust it. So I never installed it, leading > to... not having had trouble with it ;-P +1 from time to time we share same POV :)

Re: Zoom.

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 02:53:05AM +, Russell wrote: > Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:01:02AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > >> Installed Zoom in Debian 10. > >> [...] > >> Ideas welcome. > > > > Instead of installing th

Re: Zoom.

Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:01:02AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: >> Installed Zoom in Debian 10. >> [...] >> Ideas welcome. > > Instead of installing the Zoom package, try just using Zoom inside > a web browser. I've used it inside

Re: Zoom.

se are 64 > bit CPUs. Yep, underpowered; 32 bit, 3.5 GB. Received this comment elsewhere. > I found my old 32 bit netbook and installed on it, it runs though > sluggish. Debian 8. It is a bit older version of Zoom (5.4) and the > constrained screen is awkward, ... So I'd st

Re: Zoom.

On 4/21/21 09:01, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi, > > Installed Zoom in Debian 10. > > Checked dependancies listed here. > https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/204206269-Installing-or-updating-Zoom-on-Linux > > A right click on the video camera icon and release on

Re: Zoom.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:21:56PM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > On 4/21/21, Richmond wrote: > > sudo apt install ~/Downloads/zoom_amd64.deb > > I just had to do this AGAIN yesterday. I download the dotDEB file then > "dpkg -i" it. It always fails due to missing dependencies. Somewhere > in th

Re: Zoom.

On 4/21/21, Richmond wrote: > pe...@easthope.ca writes: > >> Installed Zoom in Debian 10. >> >> Checked dependancies listed here. >> https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/204206269-Installing-or-updating-Zoom-on-Linux >> >> A right click on the vide

Re: Zoom.

On 2021-04-21, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi, > > Installed Zoom in Debian 10. > > Checked dependancies listed here. > https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/204206269-Installing-or-updating-Zoom-on-Linux > > A right click on the video camera icon and release on "

Re: Zoom.

pe...@easthope.ca writes: > Hi, > > Installed Zoom in Debian 10. > > Checked dependancies listed here. > https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/204206269-Installing-or-updating-Zoom-on-Linux > > A right click on the video camera icon and release on "Join Meeting..

Re: Zoom.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:22:46AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:01:02AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > Installed Zoom in Debian 10. > > [...] > > Ideas welcome. > > Instead of installing the Zoom package, try just using Zoom inside >

Re: Zoom.

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:01:02AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Installed Zoom in Debian 10. > [...] > Ideas welcome. Instead of installing the Zoom package, try just using Zoom inside a web browser. I've used it inside Google Chrome without any problems. I can't vo

Zoom.

Hi, Installed Zoom in Debian 10. Checked dependancies listed here. https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/204206269-Installing-or-updating-Zoom-on-Linux A right click on the video camera icon and release on "Join Meeting..." gives the window in this screenshot. http://e

Re: Server for Jitsi; was: Zoom.

>> ... I use and recommend Jitsi as a Free Software alternative. > Do you self-host? Any 3rd party host recommendable? Not myself, but we have an instance running on our department's servers. Stefan

Re: Server for Jitsi; was: Zoom.

Am 22. Oct, 2020 schwätzte pe...@easthope.ca so: From: Stefan Monnier Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:16:01 -0400 ... I use and recommend Jitsi as a Free Software alternative. Do you self-host? Any 3rd party host recommendable? If you need the service for a Free Software project talk to FOSShos

Re: Server for Jitsi; was: Zoom.

pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:16:01 -0400 > > ... I use and recommend Jitsi as a Free Software alternative. > > Do you self-host? Any 3rd party host recommendable? I run three instances of Jitsi; two for my company (one is a test and can probably g

Server for Jitsi; was: Zoom.

From: Stefan Monnier Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:16:01 -0400 > ... I use and recommend Jitsi as a Free Software alternative. Do you self-host? Any 3rd party host recommendable? Thx, ... P. -- Tel: +1 604 670 0140Bcc: peter at easthope. ca

  1   2   3   >