On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:21:45AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have upgraded to the progeny/woody line and now have Xfree86 4.0.2. Since
> then I have not been able to utilze my backspace/delete properly (they don't
> work.) I have been looking for xmodmap and can't
I have upgraded to the progeny/woody line and now have Xfree86 4.0.2. Since
then I have not been able to utilze my backspace/delete properly (they don't
work.) I have been looking for xmodmap and can't find it. How do I
reinstate the functionality of the keys?
Can anyone help please.
Badiane
hey debians,
i just dist-upgraded to testing and am now running XF86 4.0.2.
however, my keyboard seems to be going wild. I have the following
settings:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
Driver"keyboard"
Option"CoreKeyboard"
Option"XkbRules" "xfree86"
Opti
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> Running startx works fine (Except for sawfish not being
Brian> installed). So I guess the problem must be gdm's fault: ii
Brian> gdm 2.0-0.beta4.15 GNOME Display Manager
No. It is the xserver's fault.
Whenever I change to
Hello,
I installed xserver-xfree86. The first few times the postinst died
with an return of 10. As I was debugging the problem (running it over
5 times), it suddenly worked perfectly, so I can't really file the bug
report... It seemed to come from debconf though (as far as I could
tell anyway).
A
Folks,
I doubt of my thinking :-)
I try to install xserver-xfree86 4.0.2-13 by dselect. When I launch the
process:
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 packages not fully installed or removed
%% Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thanks for the reply.
es> does chvt work?
I don't have chvt anywhere on my system (locate says no), nor can I find
it with apt-cache search or the Debian web-based package search.
Can someone who has it do a dpkg -S chvt and tell me where it comes
fr
"Paul D. Smith" wrote:
>
> It seems to me that I saw something about this a few months ago, but 30
> mins+ with Google and the Debian mailing list archive search engine
> netted me zippo :(.
>
> I upgraded to the latest testing version a few days ago, and ever since
> I did I can't use C-A-F{1,2,
It seems to me that I saw something about this a few months ago, but 30
mins+ with Google and the Debian mailing list archive search engine
netted me zippo :(.
I upgraded to the latest testing version a few days ago, and ever since
I did I can't use C-A-F{1,2,3...} to switch back to my text consol
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:35:20AM -0500, D-Man wrote:
HI..
|| There are some problem I thing. It seems, that they are waiting for gnome1.4.
|| xfree4.0.2 are in woody and works great, but the woody's gnome is very bad.
|
|My main interest in gnome 1.2 is because I was using it for quite a
|while
%% Bill White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bw> I have heard that people have gotten the sources and built them
bw> for potato, but it's not clear to my untutored eye which source
bw> packages I need to get.
Look on DebianPlanet (www.debianplanet.org). There's an article there
somewhere abou
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 11:05:31AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
| On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:45:31PM -0500, D-Man wrote:
|
| |Does anyone know when they will make it into woody (I'm mostly
| |interested in Gnome)?
|
| Hi...
|
| there is a thread on debian-devel, about gnome...
I was subscri
Hello,
Am Freitag, den 30. März 2001 09:11:56 schrieb Bill White:
> I didn't explain myself completely. I don't want to upgrade to
> woody until woody is named stable. This is a production machine,
> and I don't want to screw it up. I know that many people are
> working with woody now, but I'm
I didn't explain myself completely. I don't want to upgrade to
woody until woody is named stable. This is a production machine,
and I don't want to screw it up. I know that many people are
working with woody now, but I'm slightly paranoid, and would like
somebody else to make my mistakes for me.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:45:31PM -0500, D-Man wrote:
|Does anyone know when they will make it into woody (I'm mostly
|interested in Gnome)?
Hi...
there is a thread on debian-devel, about gnome...
Ther are some problem I thing. It seems, that they are waiting for gnome1.4.
xfree4.0.2 are in w
Hi Shaleh !
Perhaps you can help me understand some issues:
- In what package is the file ld-linux.so.2 packaged ?? Why do sometimes
this lib is a link and sometimes a file, may I assume it has to be with
versions ? I upgraded from potato to woody and lilo complained about
'version GLIBC
On 30-Mar-2001 Bill White wrote:
> What is the easiest way to upgrade to X 4.0.2 or 4.0.3 for a
> Debian system. I need to upgrade to an X version which has
> support for a Voodoo5, and I can't seem to find a set of
> sources from XFree86 or the DRI project which will build.
>
upgrade to woody
What is the easiest way to upgrade to X 4.0.2 or 4.0.3 for a
Debian system. I need to upgrade to an X version which has
support for a Voodoo5, and I can't seem to find a set of
sources from XFree86 or the DRI project which will build.
Thanks.
--
Call me Svejk.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] G
30 March 2001 6:46
> To: Debian Users List
> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Gnome 1.2 debs + Debian 2.2r2
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 05:08:04PM -0300, Ivens Porto wrote:
> | Anyone knows where i can get .debs of XFree86 4.0.2 and
> Gnome 1.2 to install
> | on
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 05:08:04PM -0300, Ivens Porto wrote:
| Anyone knows where i can get .debs of XFree86 4.0.2 and Gnome 1.2 to install
| on a Debian 2.2r2 (potato)?
sid.
Does anyone know when they will make it into woody (I'm mostly
interested in Gnome)?
-D
Anyone knows where i can get .debs of XFree86 4.0.2 and Gnome 1.2 to install
on a Debian 2.2r2 (potato)?
Thanks,
-
Ivens Porto
Diretor - Versatili
Uberlandia - MG
Tel.: (34) 3236-2191, ramal 31
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.versatili.com.br
TECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:14:05 -0800
> To: debian-user
> Subject: Re: xserver-xfree86 (4.0.2-7) freezing during install
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:21:46 -0600
>
> OK, purged all traces of X and tried again (by sele
es and gpm is working fine,
so I'm not sure where to go next.
--
Charles Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
817-556-4720
> From: Jimmy Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 16 Mar 2001 14:02:55 -0700
> To: Charles Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hello Charles,
You can do the command 'XFree86 --config' to get it to probe hardware
and create a generic XF86Config-4 file.
I do not know why the command 'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86' does
not seem to be creating an XF86Config-4
file. I think that command should normally be the way to create
It might be helpful to go to http://dri.sourceforge.net.
They have a resources page which has a generic X config file for the Rage card
(and I believe it is an X4 config file).
If you download that, it will prolly just need some minor changes, but its a
good place to start.
Hope this helps
Trying to install X on a brand new sid box. Selected
task-x-window-system-core (and all its dependencies
and it freezes at:
Setting up xserver-xfree86 (4.0.27)...
I have a Rage 128 card...the non-free xserver-rage128 installs successfully,
except that I can't figure out how to generate XF86Config
Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've heard that it might be possible to use anti-aliased fonts with
> XFree86 4.0.2, but I couldn't find more information about it. Can somebody
> point me into the right direction?
check the document
Hi,
I've heard that it might be possible to use anti-aliased fonts with
XFree86 4.0.2, but I couldn't find more information about it. Can somebody
point me into the right direction?
Martin
On Sunday 04 March 2001 22:14, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgradet to woody, and i must use xf86 4.0.2 because i have a
> geforce2. I have the server installed. But i can't find any 4.0.2
> clients. They are 3.3.6 and also the grafic servers are all 3.3.6!
> How can i get the new ones? Ar
Hi,
I upgradet to woody, and i must use xf86 4.0.2 because i have a geforce2. I
have the server installed. But i can't find any 4.0.2 clients. They are 3.3.6
and also the grafic servers are all 3.3.6! How can i get the new ones? Are
there any? How can i setup the new server? XF86Setup isn't her
>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:50:50 -0500 (EST)
>
>
>On 27 Feb 2001, Jonas Wolz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running a Potato (2.2r2) system and want to upgrade it to
Xfree86 4.0.2
>> using the updated packages from the debian server.
>> My question: Will
On 27 Feb 2001, Jonas Wolz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a Potato (2.2r2) system and want to upgrade it to Xfree86 4.0.2
> using the updated packages from the debian server.
> My question: Will the binary packages run on my system without problems or do
> I
> have
Hello,
Am Dienstag, den 27. Februar 2001 11:57:41 schrieb Jonas Wolz:
> I'm running a Potato (2.2r2) system and want to upgrade it to
> Xfree86 4.0.2 using the updated packages from the debian server. My
> question: Will the binary packages run on my system without problems
>
Hi,
I'm running a Potato (2.2r2) system and want to upgrade it to Xfree86 4.0.2
using the updated packages from the debian server.
My question: Will the binary packages run on my system without problems or do I
have to take the source package ?
TIA,
Jonas
Forgive the newbie question, but is there an easy way
to remove X in its entirety and reinstall it? I've
installed woody and everything but X is working like a
champ.
Thanks,
John
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great
I've got the G450 also. I'm running dual-head. I think I read
somewhere that DRI doesn't work under dual-head. Is this true?
> On 20010213.2045, Damon Muller said ...
>
> Quoth Lee Elliott,
> > I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> > currently 2.4.0-test11
On 19 Feb 2001, Martin Albert wrote:
>
> YOU're actually RUNning the OLD 3.3.6 server.
> > My driver is xserver-svga 3.3.6X
>
> (man dpkg ;-)
> dpkg -l x\*
>
> shows each package installed on your machine whose name starts with x.
> (the \ before * is an 'escape character' for the shell; says '
On Saturday 17 February 2001 09:33, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2001, Martin Albert wrote:
> > On Friday 16 February 2001 09:41, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > I'm currently confused about X-4. I've been keeping up to date
> >
> > You're actually running the old 3.3.6 server, propably you di
On 18 Feb 2001, Brad Hubbard wrote:
>
> > Xfree 4.x has TWO config filesunlike the old Xfree 3.x
> >
> > Make sure you are changing both files and not just the old type
> XFree86.cfg
> > one
> >
> > Took me a while to figure this one out
>
> Presumably one is /etc/X11/XF86Config, what's t
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 08:41:10PM -0500, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> Recently I installed XFree86 on my Intel box in the hopes of getting the
> NVIDIA drivers up and running. I changed the config files for apt to
> point to the unstable distro and did the upgrade but it didn't seem to
> work. Curr
Recently I installed XFree86 on my Intel box in the hopes of getting the
NVIDIA drivers up and running. I changed the config files for apt to
point to the unstable distro and did the upgrade but it didn't seem to
work. Currently I can't even get X up and running and am thinking about
reinstalling
> Xfree 4.x has TWO config filesunlike the old Xfree 3.x
>
> Make sure you are changing both files and not just the old type
XFree86.cfg
> one
>
> Took me a while to figure this one out
Presumably one is /etc/X11/XF86Config, what's the other one?
Cheers,
Brad
Congo Systems
12 Northgate
I have similar problem on ATI mach64 system.
After checking system, I found FB support is enabled only on
Matrox system, if you are using default kernel.
I recompiled kernel with ATI, VGA, SVGA enabled.
Now my boot console screen goes crazy.
I am playing with it now. (Teleneting from other mach
; > > > G400
> > > > cards and fixes some (if not all ...) known issues, i'd suggest you'd
> > > > take a
> > > > look at this kernel. The 2.4.x kernels really impressed me, if the
> > rest
> > > > of
> > > > linux development would ha
On 17 Feb 2001, Martin Albert wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2001 09:41, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > I'm currently confused about X-4. I've been keeping up to date with
> > Testing and now I don't know which version of X I'm running. My
> > driver is xserver-svga 3.3.6X. I tried running xf86config
On Friday 16 February 2001 09:41, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I'm currently confused about X-4. I've been keeping up to date with
> Testing and now I don't know which version of X I'm running. My
> driver is xserver-svga 3.3.6X. I tried running xf86config and this
> generated a XF86Config-4 file whic
On 16 Feb 2001, Leigh Dyer wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2001 19:55:06 +1100, hogan wrote:
>
> I checked your XFree86 log, and it's telling me that it's treating your
> card as a generic VGA card, hence the 64K of RAM and 320x240 pixel
> screen. I'm pretty certain this is because your chipset isn't suppor
ginal Message-
> From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM
> To: Damon Muller
> Cc: User Debian
> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400
>
>
> I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, bu
Hogan
Xfree 4.x has TWO config filesunlike the old Xfree 3.x
Make sure you are changing both files and not just the old type XFree86.cfg
one
Took me a while to figure this one out
Tony Platt
Sys Admin
Eliza Travel Pty Ltd
http://www.elizatravel.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;d suggest you'd
> > > take a
> > > look at this kernel. The 2.4.x kernels really impressed me, if the
> rest
> > > of
> > > linux development would have similar level of quality linux would
> > > definetly
> > > rule the desktop.
> > >
nd Virge and Savage variants, are actually supported at all
in XFree86 4.0.2. The drivers for earlier chips (such as Trio variants)
have been ported from 3.3.6 yet.
I checked your XFree86 log, and it's telling me that it's treating your
card as a generic VGA card, hence the 64K of RAM
kernel. The 2.4.x kernels really impressed me, if the rest
> > of
> > linux development would have similar level of quality linux would
> > definetly
> > rule the desktop.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Ok.. I've finally got XFree86 4.0.2 to the point where it will go into X :)
Only problem - it shows stuff in 320x240 - and only half the screen..
Have attached my config file + log..
Any ideas? It says my card (actually on board S3) isn't supported but that
SVGA driver should hand
> rule the desktop.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM
> To: Damon Muller
> Cc: User Debian
> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400
>
>
> I am using 2.2.18 and have a
RI.
Of course the DRI is significantly slower than at 16bpp, but it works.
I'm running Sid w/ Xfree86 4.0.2, btw.
Sean
--
We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on
when it's necessary to compromise.
-- Larry Wall
Hello James,
The answer was in there:-)
First of all though, I switched to the 2.4.1 kernel, re-compiled, and it
made no difference - I still got an error about mga_hal missing.
I had a look at matrox.com and found the new drivers that one of the
other posters had mentioned, and on the same page
inux would definetly
rule the desktop.
-Original Message-
From: Chun Kit Edwin Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 11:49 AM
To: Damon Muller
Cc: User Debian
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0.2 and Matrox G400
I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the k
I am using 2.2.18 and have agp, via, dri compiled in the kernel, but
leaving mga as a module and i guess I have the same problem as you. X4.02
crashes my machine at 16 and 32bpp. I guess it has to do will drm. When i
check the XF86 website, it seems to be that they suggested kernel 2.4.x
kernel. I
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:59:45PM +, Lee Elliott wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Something about the tone of your reply makes me think I've missed
> something obvious:-)
>
> Certainly, please do tell me what you did/where I've gone wrong.
Don't read too much into the tone of my reply :) It's jus
Hello James,
Something about the tone of your reply makes me think I've missed
something obvious:-)
Certainly, please do tell me what you did/where I've gone wrong.
TIA,
LeeE
James Dietrich wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:45:34PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
> > Quoth Lee Elliott,
> > >
Hello Damon,
Thanks for replying. I tried a driver from Matrox and it gave me the
same results. It was about twice the size of the mga_drv.o generated
from the kernel source, so it must be different somehow. I remember
having to adjust my monitor quite a bit, but still no h/w acceleration.
I'v
Hello Brian,
Thanks for replying.
Yes, towards the end of the log I get:
...
(==) MGA(0): Write-combining range (0xf200,0x100)
(--) MGA(0): 16 DWORD fifo
(==) MGA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(II) MGA(0): [drm] bpp: 16 depth: 16
(II) MGA(0): [drm] Sarea 2196+632: 2828
(0): [drm] creat
Quoth Lee Elliott,
> I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
> 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log
I don't know if this will help for your particular prob
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:39:11PM +, Lee Elliott wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
> currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
> 2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.lo
Hello List,
I'm not able to get hardware rendering/GL running on my G400. Kernel is
currently 2.4.0-test11 (2.4.0 was a bit wobbly for me - haven't d/loaded
2.4.1 yet) and I'm getting the follwing error in /var/log/XFre86.0.log
(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(II) Loading sub module "vgahw"
(II)
> My problem is, that I have in non-KDE-apps a very big font. All menus
and
> buttons in GTK-Apps are drawn with a 14 or 16 pixel font. Also
Netscape
> 4.76 has a too big font in his interface. However, the xfs is working,
> KDE-Apps can use all fonts correctly.
>
> I nearly tried everything to sol
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Andre wrote:
> Hello All !!!
>
> I want to install XFree-86-4.0.2 but i have the followig problem:
>
> when i try to install, i get the following error-message:
>
> Unpacking replacement xserver-xfree86 ...
> Setting up xserver-xfree86 (4.0.2-1) ...
Hello,
I have a problem with fonts and XFree86 4.0.2. My system is a fresh potato
installation with some apt-gets towards unstable, so I am now running
XFree86 4.0.2 and KDE 2.1 beta1. All necessary files are installed, like
xfs, xfont-packages and so on.
My problem is, that I have in non-KDE
Hello All !!!
I want to install XFree-86-4.0.2 but i have the followig problem:
when i try to install, i get the following error-message:
Unpacking replacement xserver-xfree86 ...
Setting up xserver-xfree86 (4.0.2-1) ...
dpkg: error processing xserver-xfree86 (--install):
subprocess post
Hi,
Until recently I had accelerated 3d graphics under X. I've now done an
update and acceleration has stopped working, and I can't figure out
why.
I'm using unstable, kernel 2.4.0-test10. The graphics card is an ati
rage128 and seems to be recognised by the kernel (r128 module) and X.
/var/log/
70 matches
Mail list logo
