on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:33:38AM -0600, Rob VanFleet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 07:43:18AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > Nope. Sorry, but I'm *really* lame when it comes to makefile issues.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:ttmkfdir]$ head Makefile
> > FREET
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 07:43:18AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Nope. Sorry, but I'm *really* lame when it comes to makefile issues.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:ttmkfdir]$ head Makefile
> FREETYPE_BASE=/usr/include/freetype
> FREETYPE_INCL=$(FREETYPE_BASE)
> FREETYPE_LIB=-L$(FR
on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 11:54:31PM -0600, Rob VanFleet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 05:19:38PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > Though I wouldn't mind knowing how to build this mother.
>
> How about this:
> change the first two lines of the Makefile from:
>
> FREETY
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 05:19:38PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Though I wouldn't mind knowing how to build this mother.
How about this:
change the first two lines of the Makefile from:
FREETYPE_BASE=../freetype-1.1
FREETYPE_INCL=$(FREETYPE_BASE)/lib
to...
FREETYPE_BASE=/usr/include/fre
on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 05:01:20PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:28:44AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com
> (kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> > I've upgraded my laptop from stable to testing. In the process, I seem
> > to have versioned up to XFr
on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:28:44AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> I've upgraded my laptop from stable to testing. In the process, I seem
> to have versioned up to XFree86v4. Currently:
>
> - X display managers don't allow a session to start (see attached
> err
on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 02:49:43PM -0600, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:20:14PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:14:39AM -0600, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:28:44AM -0800,
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:20:14PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:14:39AM -0600, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:28:44AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > > I've upgraded my laptop from stable to testing. In the pro
on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:14:39AM -0600, Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:28:44AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > I've upgraded my laptop from stable to testing. In the process, I seem
> > to have versioned up to XFree86v4. Currently:
> >
> > - X
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:28:44AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> I've upgraded my laptop from stable to testing. In the process, I seem
> to have versioned up to XFree86v4. Currently:
>
> - X display managers don't allow a session to start (see attached
> error output). This is ann
I've upgraded my laptop from stable to testing. In the process, I seem
to have versioned up to XFree86v4. Currently:
- X display managers don't allow a session to start (see attached
error output). This is annoying, but not a biggie. startx works
fine. But I have been beating my hea
11 matches
Mail list logo