On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Philip Lehman wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Wakko Warner wrote:
>
> >I just have one problem with xmms. I can't find the skin from x11amp which
> >is what's keeping me from upgrading the one copy I have on my machine (I
> >don't lik
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Wakko Warner wrote:
>I just have one problem with xmms. I can't find the skin from x11amp which
>is what's keeping me from upgrading the one copy I have on my machine (I
>don't like the default skin and I've yet to find one I like other than
I just have one problem with xmms. I can't find the skin from x11amp which
is what's keeping me from upgrading the one copy I have on my machine (I
don't like the default skin and I've yet to find one I like other than the
x11amp one). Does anyone happen have it or know any
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Andrei Ivanov wrote:
> Afternooon all.
> I got x11amp running, but somehow user can not use volume/balance
> controls. The slidebar works, just nothing happens. Yet user can control
> the equalizer. Under root everything works.
> I thought that user might not
Afternooon all.
I got x11amp running, but somehow user can not use volume/balance
controls. The slidebar works, just nothing happens. Yet user can control
the equalizer. Under root everything works.
I thought that user might not be in the group with mixer, but I put him
there, (I have mixer and
#x27;ve seen a few comments about X11amp before, but most of the
> suggestions
> were to upgrade to 2.2. I tried installing the .deb from unstable, and had to
> upgrade a few other packages before it would work, but this caused many, many
> conflicts in my system, according to dselect.
*- On 29 Jul, John Gay wrote about "Re: X11amp for 2.1?"
>
>
> Actually, I installed from CD with dselect. I haven't set up my internet
> connection, as phone service here in Ireland is a bit expensive. I usually
copy
> anything I need to floppy at work and bring
On 28 Jul, Steve Udell wrote:
| First of all x11amp is now XMMS www.xmms.org
| Second of all potato has a nice .deb of xmms
| Third of all StarOffice 5.1 (the 40 doller version on CD) gave me no
problems
|installing on a potato system, no I didn't even need to put thoes
*- On 29 Jul, John Gay wrote about "X11amp for 2.1?"
>
>
> I know I've seen a few comments about X11amp before, but most of the
> suggestions
> were to upgrade to 2.2. I tried installing the .deb from unstable, and had to
> upgrade a few other packages before it
Thanks for the pointer to xmms, but that is for potato, I.E. 2.2 I'm running
slink, 2.1 I tried installing x11amp from potato and it called for newer libs,
this, I believe was the reason Star Office 5.1 wrecked my system when it
installed. My question was, is it possible to compile the so
First of all x11amp is now XMMS www.xmms.org
Second of all potato has a nice .deb of xmms
Third of all StarOffice 5.1 (the 40 doller version on CD) gave me no problems
installing on a potato system, no I didn't even need to put thoes old libs
in to correct. Yes I had problems wit
I know I've seen a few comments about X11amp before, but most of the suggestions
were to upgrade to 2.2. I tried installing the .deb from unstable, and had to
upgrade a few other packages before it would work, but this caused many, many
conflicts in my system, according to dselect. Every
hi
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp.
> >> xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp.
>> xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles.
>
> that looks like quite consistent number. On my cyrix-333
As far as I know, X11amp is being replaced with XMMS. Take a look at:
www.xmms.org
Trying to access www.X11amp.org will take you to XMMS also.
On 05-Jul-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp.
> xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's
hi
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp.
> xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles.
that looks like quite consistent number. On my cyrix-333
i usually got 18-19%.
> I don't
> think x11amp used mor
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 02:03:16AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp.
> xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles. I don't
> think x11amp used more than a couple percent.
One of the bugs in x11amp was that it used
I upgraded to xmms and I'd like to go back to x11amp.
xmms uses about 30% of my 233cyrix's cycles. I don't
think x11amp used more than a couple percent.
Is there a deb of x11amp around still somewhere?
I can't find it in the archive.
---
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Thorsten Manegold wrote:
> I have the slink version of libesd0 and esound installed, but their
> version is not sufficient.
> The debs from the unstable branch seem to be linked to libc2.1...
Ah! i didn't stop to think of that...
Since you already have esound compiled from
> On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Thorsten Manegold wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> > I want to compiele x11amp so that it usese esd. However the configure
> > script does not find esd.
> > I installed enlightenment 0.15.5 from source to /usr/local.
>
> You can get esd from your p
Have you got the most recent version of apt, as I had a _really_
old version that my upgrade to slink had for some reason not
upgraded. Once that was done, everything worked fine.
Peter Allen
"Nadarajah, Dinesh" wrote:
>
> I have been trying to install x11amp fo
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Thorsten Manegold wrote:
> Hi!
> I want to compiele x11amp so that it usese esd. However the configure
> script does not find esd.
> I installed enlightenment 0.15.5 from source to /usr/local.
You can get esd from your preferred Debian mirror, just install
Hi!
I want to compiele x11amp so that it usese esd. However the configure
script does not find esd.
I installed enlightenment 0.15.5 from source to /usr/local.
TIA
Thorsten Manegold
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 04:26:09PM -0500, Nadarajah, Dinesh wrote:
> I have been trying to install x11amp for quite sometime now but I keep
> running into installation problems. I tried it with both the .deb package
> (from www.debian .org) as well as the source. I get the follow
I have been trying to install x11amp for quite sometime now but I keep
running into installation problems. I tried it with both the .deb package
(from www.debian .org) as well as the source. I get the following error:
Libc6 conflicts with apt.
FYI: x11amp requires a newer version of libc6 but
0 overclocked, SB16 Sound
> > card etc. My problem is that after a game of Quake2 I can no longer
> > play mp3s on x11amp, I get "can't open audio" If I use mpg123 or
> > anything else I can play sounds fine. I am at a loss, ps aux shows no
> > errant/zombied pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running Slink, kernel 2.2.5, on a P200 overclocked, SB16 Sound
> card etc. My problem is that after a game of Quake2 I can no longer
> play mp3s on x11amp, I get "can't open audio" If I use mpg123 or
&g
Reply-To:
I am running Slink, kernel 2.2.5, on a P200 overclocked, SB16 Sound card etc.
My problem is that after a game of Quake2 I can no longer play mp3s on x11amp,
I get "can't open audio" If I use mpg123 or anything else I can play sounds
fine. I am at a loss, ps aux shows no
Thanks to the person who was helping me get x11amp 0.9-beta1.1 working on my
slink machine. I just got it working today. I had to compile my own gtk1.2
and gdk1.2 from the sources in potato (debian/rules binary is so nice!) and I
removed all other versions of gtk, glib, and gdk which meant
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 18:29:32 +0200, Armin Wegner wrote:
>What is the program x11amp good for?
It's most probably an MP3 player for X.
MP3 is a format for storing music on your PC. It uses lossy compression to
reduce the size of the file by a factor of about 8-12 compared to the &qu
Playing .mp3 music files (it's very much like winamp but for X)
Rich.
Armin Wegner wrote:
>
> What is the program x11amp good for?
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Playing mp3s from a cutesy windowed app that looks like winamp.
Sean
Armin Wegner wrote:
> What is the program x11amp good for?
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
--
That's what she said.
What is the program x11amp good for?
haven't the foggiest idea how to correct that.
>
> > I do, though it hasn't caused a problem in the past (even with
> > x11amp-0.9a[123]) I have libgtk1 installed for the version of gimp I run
> > (I've been meaning to upgrade, maybe this is an excuse) but not
>
look at mine which is almost the
> same... except for a few key differences: The first 4 libraries are
> missing! Well, that'll cause the errors I was getting, unfortunately, I
> haven't the foggiest idea how to correct that.
>
> I do, though it hasn't caused a probl
le squeamish about glibc2.1 and I'm running
potato at work where ddd has just stopped working since upgrading from
slink. I need ddd at home, so I'm not willing to take that step yet.
> I've compiled every prerelease version of x11amp, up to and including
> beta1.1, without pr
I'm guessing you are running potato, so if not this may not apply:
I've compiled every prerelease version of x11amp, up to and including
beta1.1, without problems. You have the gtk and glib stuff, but do you have
the gdk stuff too? For me, x11amp needs these libraries:
tomorrow:~> l
I'm too impatient to wait for a deb of x11amp 0.9-beta1.1, so I tried to
compile it myself having had great success with the alpha versons. It
compiled without issue, but I've got some strange problems with the
binary. Here's a cut & paste job.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~]$ x11amp
as root: chmod u+s /usr/X11R6/bin/x11amp
eric.
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 03:29:53PM +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> What can I do in order to put the setuid-root flag on x11amp 0.9 so that it
> will
> only use 0.5 % of my CPU like the other version. (the new doesn't ask for
> this) ?
What can I do in order to put the setuid-root flag on x11amp 0.9 so that it will
only use 0.5 % of my CPU like the other version. (the new doesn't ask for
this) ?
Thank you !
--
// -oOo- -oOo ---oOo--\\
| Sami Dalouche | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Every time I run x11amp (0.9a3-1), it starts four processes:
Yup, that's supposed to happen. If you do a ps uxf, you'll notice that some
of the x11amp processes are actually spawned by the original that you
started. I think it has to do with threading.
Hope that helps,
Alan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Every time I run x11amp (0.9a3-1), it starts four processes:
telmerco 12315 0.3 6.3 5564 4020 ?S09:59 0:00 x11amp
telmerco 12323 0.0 6.3 5564 4020 ?S09:59 0:00 x11amp
telmerco 12331 0.0 6.3 5564 4020 ?S09:59 0:00 x11amp
telmerco 12330 0.2 6.3
Matt Garman wrote:
>
> I installed x11amp, but it has a nasty problem. It "skips" when it
> plays, but consistenly. It's hard to describe, but imagine several,
> consistent but short-lived skips. The effect is such that it really
> slows down the music (b
I installed x11amp, but it has a nasty problem. It "skips" when it
plays, but consistenly. It's hard to describe, but imagine several,
consistent but short-lived skips. The effect is such that it really
slows down the music (because of the regular skipping). Sometimes it
appear
I'm trying to do a roll-your-own x11amp, but can't get past the
configure script. I get the following message:
checking for thread-safe xlibs... no
configure: error: You need to have thread-safe xlibs to use x11amp.
Wha?
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matt Garman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They&
"Daniel J. Brosemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> 1. x11amp (v 0.9) used to take about 13% CPU according to top... now it's
> sitting steadfast at 35.3% Is it really taking more processor, or is this
> due to some kernel option I might have chosen?
I&#x
I recently made the upgrade (a few hours ago) to kernel 2.2.1 from 2.0.34
and really like it! I have only two questions that I would be grateful if
someone more knowledgable could answer.
1. x11amp (v 0.9) used to take about 13% CPU according to top... now it's
sitting steadfast at 35.3%
>> Does anyone know where one can find x11amp as a debian package. I
>> certainly have it on my computer:
>>
>> ii x11ampg 0.7-1 X11 amp, a mp3 player
>>
>> but I don't remember where I got it, and it isn't on the official
>&g
On 01-Feb-99 Daniel Elenius wrote:
> Does anyone know where one can find x11amp as a debian package. I
> certainly have it on my computer:
>
> ii x11ampg 0.7-1 X11 amp, a mp3 player
>
> but I don't remember where I got it, and it isn't on the off
Does anyone know where one can find x11amp as a debian package. I
certainly have it on my computer:
ii x11ampg 0.7-1 X11 amp, a mp3 player
but I don't remember where I got it, and it isn't on the official
debian sites. Also a more recent version would be nice, but it&
Hi debian world.
I had troubles with x11amp. After playing A LOT with configuration
stuff, i made x11amp work!!
What i did...
I realase that x11amp works when the ``System V IPC'' option from the
general tab of the kernel configuration in installed into kernel.
(Now elpus work t
phillip Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, im still getting troubles with x11amp (and eplus...)
> [i can only play mp3 when booting with the typycal kernel, the one that
> comes with kernel-image2.0.34.deb...]
>
[it is a PnP SB AWE64]
[au, wav play, no mp3]
Try setting
phillip Neumann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I discover that when i want to here some music with x11amp, i must boot
> my system with the "default" kernel image. I cannot play any mp3 with
> x11amp when i boot using my custom image.
> In the kenrel options of sound i hav
Hi, im still getting troubles with x11amp (and eplus...)
[i can only play mp3 when booting with the typycal kernel, the one that
comes with kernel-image2.0.34.deb...]
>I guess it isn´t a PnP card. S...
Well in fact it is a PnP. I had to do all this stuff with isapnp. I've
got
phillip Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I discover that when i want to here some music with x11amp, i must boot
> my system with the "default" kernel image. I cannot play any mp3 with
> x11amp when i boot using my custom image.
> In the kenrel options of soun
Hi,
I discover that when i want to here some music with x11amp, i must boot
my system with the "default" kernel image. I cannot play any mp3 with
x11amp when i boot using my custom image.
In the kenrel options of sound i have:
Sound card support (Module)
SB support
On Sat, May 16, 1998 at 05:43:46AM -0400, Paul Miller wrote:
>
> Anyone used x11amp before? Top seems to be reporting odd cpu statistics.
> Look at the table below. Both programs were ran on the same system, one
> before upgrading to a pentium-200mmx chip, and the other after.
Anyone used x11amp before? Top seems to be reporting odd cpu statistics.
Look at the table below. Both programs were ran on the same system, one
before upgrading to a pentium-200mmx chip, and the other after.
program cyrix-166+ pentium-200mmx
mpg123 40% 10%
x11amp 80
58 matches
Mail list logo
