-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/22/07 09:14, Daniel Santos wrote:
> I searched packages.debian.org and the description is similar. GNU C
$ apt-cache show glibc
W: Unable to locate package glibc
E: No packages found
> library. Why are they different packages ?
libc6 *is* gli
I searched packages.debian.org and the description is similar. GNU C
library. Why are they different packages ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I was looking in the list of packages that are available and I came across
> these two
>
> linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
>
> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
>
> So I basically would like to know
; On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
> > > > linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
> > > > kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> > > >
> > > > So I basically would like to know whats the difference (apart from the
> > > > version numb
mage-2.6.15-1-686
> > > kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> > >
> > > So I basically would like to know whats the difference (apart from the
> > > version numbers obviously).
> >
> > I think that the linux kernel packages have moved to the former name
> > sc
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:52:42AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> [posted to debian-user-digest rather than debian-user?]
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
> > linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
> > kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
>
> > So I basicall
gt;
> > So I basically would like to know whats the difference (apart from the
> > version numbers obviously).
> > The description using apt-cache isnt very helpful.
>
> My impression is that the naming scheme was changed from
> kernel-image-XXX to linux-image-X
Brent Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking in the list of packages that are available and I came across
> these two
> linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> So I basically would like to know whats the difference (apart from the
> version n
Friday, 17 February 2006 17:33, Brent Clark wrote:
> linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
>
> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
>
> So I basically would like to know whats the difference (apart from
> the version numbers obviously). The description using apt-cache isnt
> very helpful.
linux-ima
[posted to debian-user-digest rather than debian-user?]
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
> linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
> So I basically would like to know whats the difference (apart from the
> version numbers obviously).
I th
Hi all
I was looking in the list of packages that are available and I came across
these two
linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
So I basically would like to know whats the difference (apart from the version
numbers obviously).
The description using apt-cache isnt very helpful
11 matches
Mail list logo
