On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:40:31AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote: > On Friday 17 February 2006 11:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:52:42AM +0000, Jon Dowland wrote: > > > [posted to debian-user-digest rather than debian-user?] > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Brent Clark wrote: > > > > linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 > > > > kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 > > > > > > > > So I basically would like to know whats the difference (apart from the > > > > version numbers obviously). > > > > > > I think that the linux kernel packages have moved to the former name > > > scheme so alternative kernels (when feasible, e.g. the FreeBSD one, > > > HURD, etc.) do not clash. > > > > I've even heard rumours of a potential windows-kernel. > > The mind boggles. > > > > -- hendrik > > As in something like FreeDOS, or any of the many projects to create a kernel > compatible with one of the various versions of Windows? > > Hal
I'd guess something like Cygwin or MSYS, maybe done better. But the rumour wasn't that specific. -- hendrik > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
