[note: by including that offensive text in the subject your message
was shunted to my "junk" box]
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:09:05PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
| Whatever happened to Unidentified Subject lines that DU used to add to
| a blank subject line?
It's Netscape, IIRC, t
In a related topic, I would be interested by a procmail rule to filter
email with date in the future (or fix them with the current time).
Christophe
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:00:55PM +1000, Nick Hastings wrote:
> * Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020910 18:18]:
> > On 0, Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PR
* Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020910 18:18]:
> On 0, Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > However, Baloo asks an interesting question. It would be nice to send
> > emails with no subject to /dev/null. Anyone got a procmail rule for
> > finding empty headers?
>
> Haven't tried it, b
On 0, Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020910 14:51]:
> > Paul Johnson wrote
> > > Whatever happened to Unidentified Subject lines that DU used to add to
> > > a blank subject line? If they're
Hi,
* Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020910 14:51]:
> Paul Johnson wrote
> > Whatever happened to Unidentified Subject lines that DU used to add to
> > a blank subject line? If they're not coming back, how do you get
> > procmail to filter against an empty subjec
Paul Johnson wrote
> Whatever happened to Unidentified Subject lines that DU used to add to
> a blank subject line? If they're not coming back, how do you get
> procmail to filter against an empty subject line?
You don't. From my .procmailrc:
:0:
* ^X-Mailing-List.*debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Whatever happened to Unidentified Subject lines that DU used to add to
a blank subject line? If they're not coming back, how do you get
procmail to filter against an empty subject line?
- --
Baloo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
7 matches
Mail list logo
