In a related topic, I would be interested by a procmail rule to filter
email with date in the future (or fix them with the current time).

Christophe

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:00:55PM +1000, Nick Hastings wrote:
> * Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020910 18:18]:
> > On  0, Nick Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > However, Baloo asks an interesting question. It would be nice to send
> > > emails with no subject to /dev/null. Anyone got a procmail rule for
> > > finding empty headers?
> > 
> > Haven't tried it, but shouldn't:
> > 
> > :0:
> > * ^Subject:[\ ]*$
> > /dev/null
> > 
> > do it?
> 
> Ah, looks good but I guess ":0:" should be ":0".
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nick.
> 
> -- 
> Debian testing/unstable
> Linux onefish 2.4.19-lavienx #1 Mon Aug 12 20:29:59 EST 2002
> i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8  F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E

Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.
-- Albert Einstein

Attachment: msg01596/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to