Re: need help: unmet dependencies

Michael Morgan wrote: > When I ran "apt --fix-broken install", I got the following message: > > The following additional packages will be installed: > chromium-browser chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra > The following packages will be upgraded: > chromium-browser chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra > >

need help: unmet dependencies

to run 'apt --fix-broken install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: chromium-browser : Depends: chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra (= 126.0.6478.164-rpt1) but 122.0.6261.89-rpt1 is to be installed or chromium-codecs-ffmpeg (= 126.0.6478.1

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

> It looks as though you have installed from security.debian.org but now > it's not in your sources.list. If you add a line like > > deb http://security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free > > then do "apt-get update", does that help the "apt-get build-dep"? This seems to hav

Re: Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

> > $ apt-cache policy libtiff-dev libtiff5 > > The command (w/ libidn2-0 added) reports: > > libtiff-dev: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 4.0.10-4 > Version table: > 4.0.10-4 500 > 500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian stable/main amd64 Packages > libtiff5: > Installed: 4.1.0

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

> You could try downgrading the two library packages explicitly: > > $ apt-get install libtiff5=1.0.10-4 libidn2-0=2.0.5-1 This is what I tried eventually, and it worked, thanks! > That might result in other errors if doing this breaks versioned > dependencies from other packages, but it's at lea

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

On 2020-02-02 at 17:57, İ. Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote: >> In turn, please respond on-list only > > I'll try, but I can't use my usual MUA ATM, so sorry if I fail at that. > >> $ apt-cache policy libtiff-dev libtiff5 > > The command (w/ libidn2-0 added) reports: > > libtiff-dev: > Installed: (none)

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

> In turn, please respond on-list only I'll try, but I can't use my usual MUA ATM, so sorry if I fail at that. > $ apt-cache policy libtiff-dev libtiff5 The command (w/ libidn2-0 added) reports: libtiff-dev: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.0.10-4 Version table: 4.0.10-4 500 50

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

> In my experience with 8 and before, yes, it may be a sign of trouble > ahead. Was there an apt-get process spinning on a CPU after that point > in the install? I didn't check, so IDK. > IIRC the network-assisted install of a package may have failed because > the pkg couldn't be found online (sa

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

İ. Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote: >> But libgnutls28-dev is in buster > > They all are, the problem is that build-dep:emacs requires packages > which seem to require some downgrades. These are not major downgrades, > but minor version or debian package version: > > libtiff-dev : Depends: libtiff5 (= 4.0

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020, 9:51 AM İ. Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote: > Hi all, > > Lastly, there was an error during installation yesterday, package > installation was paused when I returned to my computer, so I restarted > the installation process. It downloaded one more package and installed > it, and t

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

(I'm replying both public and private in response to your request for such in another message. In turn, please respond on-list only - preferably to the copy transmitted via the list, if possible; the way you replied to deloptes seems to have produced the desired effect, at least by what is publicly

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

BTW I'd really appreciate if you could reply to me on-list instead of to the list only, given I'm not subscribed to the list. Thanks a lot in advance! -- İ. Göktuğ Kayaalp / @cadadr / pgp: 024C 30DD 597D 142B 49AC 40EB 465C D949 B101 2427

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

> But libgnutls28-dev is in buster They all are, the problem is that build-dep:emacs requires packages which seem to require some downgrades. These are not major downgrades, but minor version or debian package version: libtiff-dev : Depends: libtiff5 (= 4.0.10-4) but 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1 is

Re: apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

uld not be installed. This may mean that you have > | requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > | distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > | or been moved out of Incoming. > | The following information may help to resolve the situation

apt-get build-dep emacs-gtk: unmet dependencies

ssible situation or if you are using the unstable | distribution that some required packages have not yet been created | or been moved out of Incoming. | The following information may help to resolve the situation: | | The following packages have unmet dependencies: | builddeps:emacs : Depends: libt

Re: resolving unmet dependencies for mega.nz application

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 3:39 AM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 03:36:10AM +0530, Tapas Mishra wrote: > > Hi, > > I downloaded a file megasync-Debian_10.0_amd64.deb from > > https://mega.nz/sync > > now when I am trying to install it. > > > > ebian@debian:~/Downloads$ sudo dpk

Re: resolving unmet dependencies for mega.nz application

On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 03:36:10AM +0530, Tapas Mishra wrote: > Hi, > I downloaded a file megasync-Debian_10.0_amd64.deb from > https://mega.nz/sync > now when I am trying to install it. > > ebian@debian:~/Downloads$ sudo dpkg -i megasync-Debian_10.0_amd64.deb First, your error messages are alre

resolving unmet dependencies for mega.nz application

packages have unmet dependencies: megasync : Depends: libcrypto++6 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmediainfo0v5 (>= 0.7.56) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libzen0v5 (>= 0.4.31-2~) but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try

Re: Unmet dependencies in installing virtualbox-5.2

On 30/07/18 15:43, 慕 冬亮 wrote: E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. What packages are held? You can list them with "apt-mark showhold". Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand

Re: Unmet dependencies in installing virtualbox-5.2

On Mo, Jul 30, 2018 at 08:06:04 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: It looks as if virtualbox-5.2 is a virtual or otherwise nonexistent He is probably using the oracle repository for virtualbox because I do use it and I have the package virtualbox-5.2 installed. ;-) Version 5.2.14 doesn’t have any pr

Re: Unmet dependencies in installing virtualbox-5.2

On 2018-07-29 at 23:43, 慕 冬亮 wrote: > Hi all, > > my host system is Debian Buster(i.e., Debian Testing). When I installed > Virtualbox-5.2, I encountered "unmet dependencies". The details is in > the following: > > $ sudo apt install virtualbox-5.2 $

Unmet dependencies in installing virtualbox-5.2

Hi all, my host system is Debian Buster(i.e., Debian Testing). When I installed Virtualbox-5.2, I encountered "unmet dependencies". The details is in the following: $ sudo apt install virtualbox-5.2 [sudo] password for mdl: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Rea

Re: installation issue package krb5-users (unmet dependencies)

ribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > krb5-user : Depends: libkrb5-3 (= 1.8.3+dfsg-4squeeze7) but > 1.10.1+dfsg-5+deb7u2 is to be installed > E: Broken packages > >

installation issue package krb5-users (unmet dependencies)

installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet

Re: A bug of design : Unmet dependencies on architecture-independent package

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, sppmg wrote: > I think it is a bug of design. This is actually not a design bug, but a bug in certain packages which are not Multi-Arch: foreign which should be. File the bug against the appropriate package with severity normal. -- Don Armstrong http://

A bug of design : Unmet dependencies on architecture-independent package

" to write down here. === Subject: Unmet dependencies on architecture-independent package Package: apt Version: 1.0.9.7 In the Debian AMD64 ，If you install ":i386" package , it will not install "all" package (architecture-independent package) , and try to remove this "break

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > OK, here's the thing that's nagging me a bit. This is what happened > as far as I can remember. > > Installed Debian > Installed Emacs24.4 from backports > Installed R from debian CRAN vide instructions from CRAN site > Installed Rstudio.deb community edition from Rst

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Mon, Feb 09 2015,Brian wrote: > On Sun 08 Feb 2015 at 18:45:16 +0530, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > [snipped 11 lines] >> 1. Do I have to uninstall & reinstall the cran packages, Rstudio before >> proceeding? And this needs to be done from backports? > > No uninstallation is necessary when y

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Sunday 08 February 2015 13:15:16 Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > I think I'm confused whether I should remember that some bits of > software are from backports and it's incumbent on me to track all this > while upgrading to Jessie or installing anything else from stable.  I > really don't want to d

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Sun 08 Feb 2015 at 18:45:16 +0530, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > Installed Debian > Installed Emacs24.4 from backports > Installed R from debian CRAN vide instructions from CRAN site > Installed Rstudio.deb community edition from Rstudio site > While installing packages via Rstudio, lCurl fails

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Monday 09 February 2015 01:32:30 Ric Moore wrote: > On 02/04/2015 04:03 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Ric Moore wrote: > >> On 02/04/2015 02:13 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > >>> How does one go about fixing broken packages? I've recently started > >>> using debian an

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On 02/04/2015 04:03 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Ric Moore wrote: On 02/04/2015 02:13 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: How does one go about fixing broken packages? I've recently started using debian and apart some fiddling to get the latest emacs24.4 on wheezy I have not

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Sat, Feb 07 2015,Bob Proulx wrote: [snipped 15 lines] > Why? Now that we understand that it was dependencies that were pulled > in for emacs the answer is easy. Simply install it using backports to > backfill the dependencies. > > apt-get -t wheezy-backports install r-base > OK, here's t

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Sat 07 Feb 2015 at 23:05:00 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > > Emacs24.4 is working for me. What fails to install was the swirl > > package in R which needed Lcurl or libcurl which needed the ssl > > libs. From yours and Brian's research it seems that the backports > > i

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > Emacs24.4 is working for me. What fails to install was the swirl > package in R which needed Lcurl or libcurl which needed the ssl > libs. From yours and Brian's research it seems that the backports > install of Emacs messes with R package installation. You say "mess

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Sat, Feb 07 2015,Bob Proulx wrote: [snipped 36 lines] > In for a penny, in for a pound. I think this is just a natural > consequence of using backport software. Sivaram should keep going > with backports. > > Since the goal is to get emacs24 installed I would keep going. > Insteall libcurl4

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

Brian wrote: > Ric Moore wrote: > > Do a CLEAN install to Jessie, if at all possible. There is just too > > great a gap between Jessie and Wheezy for me to trust upgrading. > > This way you get it all right, from the get-go. It would be like > > "upgrading" 8.04 Ubuntu to 14.10 in one go. Do a back

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

Brian wrote: > Brian wrote: > > It is good that you have provided sufficient information in this > > thread to be able to follow in your footsteps as I am now able to > > reproduce your problem. > > > > I installed emacs24: > >apt-get -t wheezy-backports install emacs24 > > Then > >apt-get

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 14:14:34 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > Do a CLEAN install to Jessie, if at all possible. There is just too > great a gap between Jessie and Wheezy for me to trust upgrading. > This way you get it all right, from the get-go. It would be like > "upgrading" 8.04 Ubuntu to 14.10 in o

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On 02/06/2015 01:01 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Lisi Reisz wrote: [snipped 7 lines] Unfortunately, it looks as though you may have to but had you thought of Jessie? The missus is asking "who's Jessie and why are you thinking of her?" ;) Sure, I'd upgrade to Jess

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 23:35:18 +0530, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Brian wrote: > > > [snipped 18 lines] > > > > > I'd be prepared to report it (if Sivaram Neelakantan doesn't) but is it > > in the emacs package? Also, what severity? If it is seen as breaking > > unrelated

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:31:51 +0530 Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > The missus is asking "who's Jessie and why are you thinking of her?" ;) > > Sure, I'd upgrade to Jessie That will please the missus... Cheers, Ron. -- Against logic there is no armor like ignorance.

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Brian wrote: [snipped 18 lines] > > I'd be prepared to report it (if Sivaram Neelakantan doesn't) but is it > in the emacs package? Also, what severity? If it is seen as breaking > unrelated software on the system it would be "critical". If it is a bug, please go ahead in

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Lisi Reisz wrote: [snipped 7 lines] > Unfortunately, it looks as though you may have to but had you thought of > Jessie? The missus is asking "who's Jessie and why are you thinking of her?" ;) Sure, I'd upgrade to Jessie >That might let you have both! Or is there a

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 11:11:32 -0600, David Wright wrote: > Quoting Sivaram Neelakantan (nsivaram@gmail.com): > > On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Brian wrote: > > > On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 14:04:25 +, Brian wrote: > > > As far as I can see, purging emacs24 may be the only solution. > > > > Oh well, th

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri, Feb 06 2015,David Wright wrote: > Quoting Sivaram Neelakantan (nsivaram@gmail.com): >> On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Brian wrote: >> > On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 14:04:25 +, Brian wrote: >> > As far as I can see, purging emacs24 may be the only solution. >> >> Oh well, that's not something I wa

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Friday 06 February 2015 16:36:43 Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > errpurging Emacs24?  The only reason I added backports was to get > the latest release of Emacs.  Well, I'd probably give up on doing > anything with Rcurl/libcurl CRAN library which is a small price to > pay.  It's not like I don

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

Quoting Sivaram Neelakantan (nsivaram@gmail.com): > On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Brian wrote: > > On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 14:04:25 +, Brian wrote: > > As far as I can see, purging emacs24 may be the only solution. > > Oh well, that's not something I want to do. Would installing jessie (has emacs24)

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Brian wrote: > On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 14:04:25 +, Brian wrote: > >> I never use backports so am not overly familiar with its operation or >> how it fits with the rest of the archives. However, this does not look >> like something that should happen. If we understood what is

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri, Feb 06 2015,Brian wrote: [snipped 17 lines] > It is good that you have provided sufficient information in this thread > to be able to follow in your footsteps as I am now able to reproduce > your problem. > > My sources list has the security entry followed by kartolo lines for > wheezy

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 14:04:25 +, Brian wrote: > I never use backports so am not overly familiar with its operation or > how it fits with the rest of the archives. However, this does not look > like something that should happen. If we understood what is happening > we can produce a solution. (

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Fri 06 Feb 2015 at 12:05:15 +0530, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05 2015,Bob Proulx wrote: > > > Brian wrote: > > [snipped 12 lines] > > > Do you have an /etc/apt/preferences file? Or /etc/apt/preferences.d/* > > files? If so what is in it? Remove it and try the apt-get update

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Thu, Feb 05 2015,Bob Proulx wrote: > Brian wrote: [snipped 12 lines] > Do you have an /etc/apt/preferences file? Or /etc/apt/preferences.d/* > files? If so what is in it? Remove it and try the apt-get update and > apt-get install again. No, I don't have any preferences or anything in pref

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On 02/05/2015 04:03 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: Brian wrote: Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: libcurl4-openssl-dev : Depends: libcurl3 (= 7.26.0-1+wheezy11) but 7.26.0-1+wheezy12 is to be installed The libcurl4-openssl-dev which depends on libcurl3 (= 7.26.0-1+wheezy11) is version 7.26.0-1+wheezy11. S

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

Brian wrote: > Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > > libcurl4-openssl-dev : Depends: libcurl3 (= 7.26.0-1+wheezy11) but > > 7.26.0-1+wheezy12 is to be installed > > The libcurl4-openssl-dev which depends on libcurl3 (= 7.26.0-1+wheezy11) > is version 7.26.0-1+wheezy11. So the question becomes: Why does

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

ding dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been m

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

p to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev : Depends: libcurl3 (= 7.26.0-1+wheezy11) but 7.26.0-1+wheezy12 is to be installed Depends: libkrb5-dev but it is not going to be installed Depends: librt

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Thu, Feb 05 2015,Bob Proulx wrote: > Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: [snipped 36 lines] > > When tracking down installation errors I am always suspicious of third > party repositories. They tend to be the problem. I would comment > that out while you are debugging the current problem. > Done.

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Thu 05 Feb 2015 at 01:17:04 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote: > Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > > > deb http://kartolo.sby.datautama.net.id/debian/ wheezy main > > Okay. kartolo.sby.datautama.net.id appears to be an up to date > mirror. Looks okay. Not only does it look okay but it also behaves okay f

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > This is what I have. > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > cat /etc/apt/sources.list > # > > # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7 _Wheezy_ - Official Snapshot amd64 > LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20141121-01:55]/ wheezy main > > #deb cdrom:[Debia

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Bob Proulx wrote: > Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: >> How does one go about fixing broken packages? > > Double check every entry being used in /etc/apt/sources.list and any > additional file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*. You said you were using > Wheezy. In that case you should have

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Wednesday 04 February 2015 20:20:10 Ric Moore wrote: > On 02/04/2015 06:26 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 February 2015 07:35:29 Ric Moore wrote: > >> As root user, apt-get install synaptic > >> Let it install your programs for you. It's a great GUI package tool, > >> that most use. >

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On 02/04/2015 04:35 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: Welcome to Debian! But as with anything if you open the hood of your car, remove the fuel injection system, partially replace it with another, then your fuel economy may suffer. :-) The standing rule is that if you break it, you get to keep both piec

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

es could not be installed. > > [snipped 5 lines] > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libcurl4-openssl-dev : Depends: librtmp-dev but it is not going to be > installed Since librtmp-dev is available in Wheezy I suspect some sources.list breakage as referenc

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

ur thread, you said that problem is: "The following packages have unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev : Depends: librtmp-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages" And why-not for librtmp-dev does not give me anything, i

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On 02/04/2015 06:26 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 04 February 2015 07:35:29 Ric Moore wrote: As root user, apt-get install synaptic Let it install your programs for you. It's a great GUI package tool, that most use. And you have got your statistics from?? I would seriously query that mos

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2015 11:41:53 Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Dejan Jocic wrote: [snipped 15 lines] > > Do you need libcurl4-openssl-dev? If not, have you tried just uninstalling > it? erm...yes, that's what I need to install

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Wednesday 04 February 2015 11:41:53 Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Dejan Jocic wrote: > > > [snipped 57 lines] > > > aptitude why-not libcurl4-openssl-dev > > i task-kde-desktop Recommends system-config-printer > > i A system-config-printer Dependspython-cupshelpers

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Dejan Jocic wrote: [snipped 57 lines] > aptitude why-not libcurl4-openssl-dev > i task-kde-desktop Recommends system-config-printer > i A system-config-printer Dependspython-cupshelpers (= 1.3.7-4) > i A python-cupshelpersDependspython-pycurl

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Wednesday 04 February 2015 07:35:29 Ric Moore wrote: > As root user, apt-get install synaptic > Let it install your programs for you. It's a great GUI package tool, > that most use. And you have got your statistics from?? I would seriously query that most users, on this list anyhow, use synap

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

e information... Done > > Some packages could not be installed. > > > > [snipped 5 lines] > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > libcurl4-openssl-dev : Depends: librtmp-dev but it is not going to be > > installed > > > >

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

hen I tried to > install libcurl4, I get the following error. > > apt-get install libcurl4-openssl-dev > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. > > [snipped 5 lines] > >

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Ric Moore wrote: > >> On 02/04/2015 02:13 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: >>> [snipped 5 lines] >> As root user, apt-get install synaptic >> Let it install your programs for you. It's a great GUI package tool, >> that most use.

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On Wed, Feb 04 2015,Ric Moore wrote: > On 02/04/2015 02:13 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: >> >> How does one go about fixing broken packages? I've recently started >> using debian and apart some fiddling to get the latest emacs24.4 on >> wheezy I have not done anything on the system. When I trie

Re: unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

On 02/04/2015 02:13 AM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: How does one go about fixing broken packages? I've recently started using debian and apart some fiddling to get the latest emacs24.4 on wheezy I have not done anything on the system. When I tried to install libcurl4, I get the following error.

unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev

ading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. [snipped 5 lines] The following packages have unmet dependencies: libcurl4-openssl-dev : Depends: librtmp-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct pro

Re: Unmet dependencies installing eclipse from testing on a stable system

On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 22:47:00 +0100 Lisi wrote: > Is the package you want available in Squeeze backports? Unfortunately, no. [1] In another thread of this list I've seen someone suggesting that /etc/apt/apt.conf has been deprecated, so I've tried creating a file in /etc/apt/atp.conf.d with the d

Re: Unmet dependencies installing eclipse from testing on a stable system

On Friday 22 June 2012 17:36:30 Vilius Panevėžys wrote: > Yes, I'll do that as a fallback, but installing packages the manual way > looses all the advantages of the package management system. Let's say > that's an exercise to learn how to use apt along the way, though > I actually need the newer ve

Re: Unmet dependencies installing eclipse from testing on a stable system

On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:36:30 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:52 + (UTC) Camaleón > wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:48:13 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote: >> >> > I need eclipse >= 3.7 to use plug-ins that refuse to work with the >> > eclipse version available in

Re: Unmet dependencies installing eclipse from testing on a stable system

On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:23:52 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:48:13 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote: > > > I need eclipse >= 3.7 to use plug-ins that refuse to work with the > > eclipse version available in squeeze. So, I'd be happy with the > > version from testing. > > (...

Re: Unmet dependencies installing eclipse from testing on a stable system

On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:48:13 +0300, Vilius Panevėžys wrote: > I need eclipse >= 3.7 to use plug-ins that refuse to work with the > eclipse version available in squeeze. So, I'd be happy with the version > from testing. (...) Have you considered in getting the upstream package instead¹? Being a

Unmet dependencies installing eclipse from testing on a stable system

you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev : Br

Re: Debian AMD64 Sid - "packages have unmet dependencies"

On Dec 19, 2009, at 6:59 AM, Johan Grönqvist wrote: Rick Thomas skrev: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-video-apm: Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.6.99.900) but 2:1.6.5-1 is installed. and a bunch of other xserver-xorg-video-* packages have the same prob

Re: Debian AMD64 Sid - "packages have unmet dependencies"

Rick Thomas skrev: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-video-apm: Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.6.99.900) but 2:1.6.5-1 is installed. and a bunch of other xserver-xorg-video-* packages have the same problem. See news.debian.net at <http://news.debi

Re: Debian PowerPC Squeeze - "packages have unmet dependencies"

On Friday 18 December 2009 12:12:52 Rick Thomas wrote: > I understand "normal churn" in testing and unstable, but these > problems have persisted for over a week. > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > epiphany-extensions-more: Depends: epiph

Debian AMD64 Sid - "packages have unmet dependencies"

xserver-xorg-video-tseng xserver-xorg- video-v4l xserver-xorg-video-vesa xserver-xorg-video-vmware xserver-xorg-video-voodoo Then a little later: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-video-apm: Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.6.99.900) but 2:1.6.5-1 is

Debian PowerPC Squeeze - "packages have unmet dependencies"

rouble... The following packages have unmet dependencies: epiphany-extensions-more: Depends: epiphany-extensions (< 2.27) but 2.28.1-2 is to be installed. epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.29.3-1 is to be installed. grdc: Depends: remmina which is a virtual packa

Re: Amarok - unmet dependencies

On 2009-07-28 11:39, AG wrote: [snip] Phew! Thanks Ron. I thought that I'd bust my new toy already!! :) Is this pretty much what one can expect using sid/ unstable then - packages being in transition for a few days until an upstream maintainer sorts things out? If so, then the earlier thread

Re: Amarok - unmet dependencies

that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies. amarok

Re: Amarok - unmet dependencies

requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies. amarok: Depends: amarok-common

Amarok - unmet dependencies

you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies. amarok: Depends: amarok-common (= 1.4.10-3) but it is not going

Re: Unmet dependencies Xfce4 [SOLVED]

eather-plugin{a} 0 packages upgraded, 29 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. Need to get 4046kB of archives. After unpacking 10.2MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libxfcegui4-4: Conflicts: libxfcegui4-3 but 4.2.2-1 is to be installed. libxfce4util4: Con

Re: Unmet dependencies Xfce4

ce4-systemload-plugin{a} > xfce4-verve-plugin{a} xfce4-wavelan-plugin{a} xfce4-weather-plugin{a} > 0 packages upgraded, 29 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. > Need to get 4046kB of archives. After unpacking 10.2MB will be used. > The following packages have unmet dep

Re: Unmet dependencies Xfce4

Daniel Burrows wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:06:15AM +0100, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: Can someone please advise on the best way to handle the following situation of unmet dependencies: $ sudo apt-get install xfce4-systemload-plugin xfce4-goodies Reading package

Re: Unmet dependencies Xfce4

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:06:15AM +0100, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Can someone please advise on the best way to handle the following > situation of unmet dependencies: > > $ sudo apt-get install xfce4-systemload-plugin xfce4-goodies > Reading package lis

Re: Unmet dependencies Xfce4

Sven Joachim wrote: On 2008-04-24 08:06 +0200, andy wrote: Can someone please advise on the best way to handle the following situation of unmet dependencies: $ sudo apt-get install xfce4-systemload-plugin xfce4-goodies Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state

Re: Unmet dependencies Xfce4

On 2008-04-24 08:06 +0200, andy wrote: > Can someone please advise on the best way to handle the following > situation of unmet dependencies: > > $ sudo apt-get install xfce4-systemload-plugin xfce4-goodies > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Read

Unmet dependencies Xfce4

Hello Can someone please advise on the best way to handle the following situation of unmet dependencies: $ sudo apt-get install xfce4-systemload-plugin xfce4-goodies Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed

Re: Resolving apt-get unmet dependencies

ve: > #apt-get install libc6-dev > ... > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.6.ds1-13etch2) but 2.6.1-3 > is to be installed > E: Broken packages > > My sources.list is: > > deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r1 _Etch_ -

Resolving apt-get unmet dependencies

Hi, I'm sure this is pretty simple, but I can't get it to work... Can somebody explain how I can install libc6-dev ? I keep getting an error message from apt-get, which I do not know how to solve: #apt-get install libc6-dev ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-de

  1   2   >