(I'm replying both public and private in response to your request for such in another message. In turn, please respond on-list only - preferably to the copy transmitted via the list, if possible; the way you replied to deloptes seems to have produced the desired effect, at least by what is publicly visible.)
On 2020-02-02 at 11:55, İ. Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote: >> But libgnutls28-dev is in buster > > They all are, the problem is that build-dep:emacs requires packages > which seem to require some downgrades. These are not major downgrades, > but minor version or debian package version: > > libtiff-dev : Depends: libtiff5 (= 4.0.10-4) but 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u1 is > to be installed What versions of libtiff-dev do you have available? In particular, what does $ apt-cache policy libtiff-dev libtiff5 say? > libidn2-dev : Depends: libidn2-0 (= 2.0.5-1) but 2.0.5-1+deb10u1 is to be > installed Similarly here. > So there's a minor version mismatch w/ libtiff5 and a debian patch > version mismatch w/ libidn2-0. > > Is there any way I resolve this w/o making a mess? Almost certainly. You just have to figure out what is making it decide not to upgrade libtiff5 and libidn2. The most common reasons in my experience are package holds / pins; I think there are other reasons possible, but I can't think of them offhand. Is there anything relevant in /etc/apt/preferences, or in files inside /etc/apt/preferences.d/ ? What does $ apt-mark showhold report? -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
