Hello,
I'm testing out Debian buster rc 1, and I have a problem that my usb camera
(the very common logitech c930) is seen twice, so there are 2 devices
(/dev/video0 & /dev/video1).
Inspecting /dev/video0 with v4l-info works, while /dev/video1 throws some
errors.
I believe this to be
>> Is any USB camera working in Debian 9?
* From: Reco recovery...@gmail.com
* Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 18:11:57 +0300
> This one does, at least right now it did with mpv.
> lsusb tells me that it's:
>
> 058f:5608 Alcor Micro Corp
* From: delop
* From: Reco
* Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 18:11:57 +0300
> This one does, at least right now it did with mpv.
> lsusb tells me that it's:
>
> 058f:5608 Alcor Micro Corp
* From: deloptes
* Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 18:04:40 +0100
> ID 0471:2036 Philips (or NXP) Webcam SPC1030NC
>
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:50:58 +0300
>> I suggest you to file a bug report unless you did it already.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877558
>
> A Labtec/Vivitar camera has a similar failure. Is
tec/Vivitar camera has a similar failure. Is any USB camera
> working in Debian 9?
This one does, at least right now it did with mpv.
lsusb tells me that it's:
058f:5608 Alcor Micro Corp
Got this one built into a laptop so I doubt it can be purchased separately.
Reco
* From: Reco
* Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:50:58 +0300
> I suggest you to file a bug report unless you did it already.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877558
A Labtec/Vivitar camera has a similar failure. Is any USB camera
working in Debian 9?
Many packages i
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 07:28:58AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> From: Reco
> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:16:20 +0300
> > Try (assuming that you have appropriate device permissions):
> >
> > mpv tv:// --tv-device=/dev/video0
>
> peter@dalton:~$ mpv tv:// --tv-device=/dev/video0
> P
From: Reco
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:16:20 +0300
> Try (assuming that you have appropriate device permissions):
>
> mpv tv:// --tv-device=/dev/video0
peter@dalton:~$ mpv tv:// --tv-device=/dev/video0
Playing: tv://
[tv] Selected driver: v4l2
[tv] name: Video 4 Linux 2 input
[tv] your device driv
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:12:19PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:10:35 +0300
> > reportbug is teasing you.
> > Today's kernel update bumped the kernel to 4.9.30-2+deb9u5.
> > Update the kernel, disregard reportbug warning and file a bugreport.
* From: Curt
* Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:22:48 + (UTC)
> I'm reading that this material requires a tweak:
> options uvcvideo quirks=0x100
> in
> /etc/modprobe.d/uvcvideo.conf
I was using quirks=0x80 but can try 100 also.
Thanks,... Peter E.
--
123456789 123456
* From: Reco
* Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:10:35 +0300
> reportbug is teasing you.
> Today's kernel update bumped the kernel to 4.9.30-2+deb9u5.
> Update the kernel, disregard reportbug warning and file a bugreport.
Now I have the kernel you mention and a /dev/video0. A little
progres
Hi.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:22:48PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-09-20, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> >> * From: Reco
> >> * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300
> >> > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for
On 2017-09-20, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>> *From: Reco
>> *Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300
>> > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for you?
>>
>> peter@dalton:~$ lsusb
>> Bus 001 Device 006: ID 045e:00f8 Micro
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:49:21PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:39 +0300
> > If the trick does not work I suggest to try the kernel from the
> > backports.
>
> Began to create a bug report and found this.
> "Your version of l
* From: Reco
* Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:39 +0300
> If the trick does not work I suggest to try the kernel from the
> backports.
Began to create a bug report and found this.
"Your version of linux-image-4.9.0-3-686-pae (4.9.30-2+deb9u3) is newer than
that in Debian! Do you still w
Hi.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: Reco
> * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300
> > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for you?
>
> peter@dalton:~$ lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 006: ID 045e:00f8 Microsoft Corp. LifeCam NX-6000
I got t
vcsa7
crw--- 1 root root 10, 63 Sep 20 05:00 /dev/vga_arbiter
crw--- 1 root root 10, 137 Sep 20 05:00 /dev/vhci
crw--- 1 root root 10, 238 Sep 20 05:00 /dev/vhost-net
Sure enough, lsusb -t shows no driver for bus 1, device 6.
What do others find for a usb camera in stretch?
Tha
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save,
> pictures taken with a USB camera connected to the box.
>
> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of
> Gnome or KDE bloat.
>
>
On Sunday 04 January 2015 22:01:53 Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 17:15:17 -0300
>
> Marcos Toro Oyarzo wrote:
> > > I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures
> > > taken with a USB camera connected to the box. Better obviously
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 21:19:46 +0100
Hans wrote:
> Maybe Camorama or GUVCView is what you are looking for. Maybe, there are some
> commandline tools, too.
Many thanks, Camorama is exactly what I was hoping for.
Cheers,
Ron.
--
King Herod has been greatly misunderstood.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 17:15:17 -0300
Marcos Toro Oyarzo wrote:
> > I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures
> > taken with a USB camera connected to the box.
> > Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of Gnome
> > or
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Renaud OLGIATI
> wrote:
>> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures
>> taken with a USB camera connected to the box.
>>
>> Better obviously wi
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Renaud OLGIATI
wrote:
> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures taken
> with a USB camera connected to the box.
>
> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of Gnome or
> KDE bloat.
>
Am Sonntag, 4. Januar 2015, 17:10:04 schrieb Renaud OLGIATI:
> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures
> taken with a USB camera connected to the box.
>
> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of Gnome or
> KDE bloat
you should try cheese https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Cheese
cheers,
2015-01-04 17:10 GMT-03:00 Renaud OLGIATI :
> I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures taken
> with a USB camera connected to the box.
>
> Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care
I am looking for a prog that will display on screen, and save, pictures taken
with a USB camera connected to the box.
Better obviously with a GUI; but I do not care to install a load of Gnome or
KDE bloat.
Any idea, advice, etc ?
Cheers,
Ron.
--
Learning does not consist of knowing
A Skype forum mentions redirecting the output from
an IEEE 1394 camera to make it appear as a USB
camera.
A trivial search hasn't yielded any help. Can
anyone describe how this is done or cite
instructions?
Thanks, ... p. cra
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
On 18/06/2008, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I used Skype video conferencing yesterday and the quality was nowhere near
as good as SIP, though in all fairness it is a bit easier to setup.
Yuck, Skype. I've been earnestly looking for free alternatives.
w
On 18/06/2008, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used Skype video conferencing yesterday and the quality was nowhere near
> as good as SIP, though in all fairness it is a bit easier to setup.
Yuck, Skype. I've been earnestly looking for free alternatives.
wengophone was good before it was abando
PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
Folk,
Video in Skype works well for friends using Imacs
and MS-Win. I'm thinking of buying a camera.
USB webcams must use USB 2 by now. So does
a Firewire camera retain any advantage over
current USB cameras.
Some, they're apparently better supported and better qualit
On 18/06/2008, PETER EASTHOPE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can a digital still camera with a USB cable be
> used for this purpose?
Some can, yes. But check first: don't assume that every model is capable of
this. I have used a Fujifilm 6900Z as a web cam.
Folk,
Video in Skype works well for friends using Imacs
and MS-Win. I'm thinking of buying a camera.
USB webcams must use USB 2 by now. So does
a Firewire camera retain any advantage over
current USB cameras.
Can a digital still camera with a USB cable be
used for this purpose?
Thanks,
user to"camera" group.
>
> regards
> Zbigniew
>
>
> *Mirto Silvio Busico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
>
> 2006-07-31 12:04
>
>
> Do
> debian-user@lists.debian.org
> DW
>
> Temat
> Etch doesn't see an usb camera
>
>
&
cze
I had the same problem in "sarge".
add the user to"camera" group.
regards
Zbigniew
Mirto Silvio Busico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2006-07-31 12:04
Do
debian-user@lists.debian.org
DW
Temat
Etch doesn't see an usb camera
Hi all,
anyone experienced t
I had the same problem in "sarge".
add the user to"camera" group.
regards
Zbigniew
Mirto Silvio Busico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2006-07-31 12:04
Do
debian-user@lists.debian.org
DW
Temat
Etch doesn't see an usb camera
Hi all,
anyone experienced
Hi all,
anyone experienced this problem?
Using Etch and a Canon s1 is (ptp prtotcol?) I am not able to access the
photo in the camera.
The camera is correctly detected as an usb device.
When I connect the camera a popup window (I'm using KDE) asks If I want
to open the camera as a folder or with
Folks,
I recently purchased a Sony DSC N-1 camera. Plug it into to two
different debian boxes (both running fairly current unstable
distributions on kernel 2.6.16-2) and it nicely automounts as a USB
drive.
However, it mounts read only, which is problematic. I'm just looking at
the internal me
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:22:37PM -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:27:01PM -0700, David E. Fox wrote:
> >
> > Hello. I am a newbie when it comes to using USB devices.
> >
> > Nevertheless, I opted for a Kodak easyshare C310. The camera is
> > supported well enough by
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:27:01PM -0700, David E. Fox wrote:
>
> Hello. I am a newbie when it comes to using USB devices.
>
> Nevertheless, I opted for a Kodak easyshare C310. The camera is
> supported well enough by linux, using gphoto2. It seems to be a PTP
> device, not a mass storage device.
Hello. I am a newbie when it comes to using USB devices.
Nevertheless, I opted for a Kodak easyshare C310. The camera is
supported well enough by linux, using gphoto2. It seems to be a PTP
device, not a mass storage device.
Plugging in the cable, I get message that the device is detected, but
no
On (14/04/06 23:32), Christopher Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the "Could not find USB device", run it as root.
>
> And if that works, add yourself to the 'camera' group rather than
> continuing to run it as root everytime you want it.
>
Thankyou, this works also.
James.
--
James Westby
On (14/04/06 23:44), Ron Johnson wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 23:44:11 -0500
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:45 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > On
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> > > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> > > Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 02:45 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (15/04/06 10:58), David Purton wrote:
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > From: David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB ca
On (15/04/06 10:58), David Purton wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: David Purton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:13 +0930
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> On Fri, Apr 1
On (15/04/06 11:24), John O'Hagan wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: John O'Hagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:24:50 +1000
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:52 am, James Westby wrote:
>
&g
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
> > mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
> > X.org, udev and
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:52 am, James Westby wrote:
>
> I tried writing a udev rule for the camera
>
> BUS="usb", SYSFS{vendor}="Canon Inc.", SYSFS{product}="Canon Digital
> Camera", NAME="camera%n"
>
> but this has no effect. I have neither /dev/sd* nor /dev/camera* with
> or without this rule.
>
I
On (14/04/06 18:52), Ron Johnson wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:52:17 -0500
> Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
[snip]
>
> Hmmm. Which version of libusb-0.1-4, usbutils &
3.1.1
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:42:52 -0500
> > Subject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
> >
> > On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to wor
ject: Re: SCSI emulation of USB camera
>
> On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
> > mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
> >
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:52 +0100, James Westby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
> mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
> X.org, udev and linux-image and their dependencies).
>
[snip]
> snd_page_alloc
Hi all,
I am trying to get my Canon S1 IS to work under Debian. I am running a
mixed testing/unstable system (mostly testing, except for libc6,
X.org, udev and linux-image and their dependencies).
It appears to me that there is some problem with SCSI emulation of my
camera. I insert the camera an
gothicdoom wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I'm trying to read the flash memory from my digital camera without
> success.
>
> This is the scenario:
> linux-2.6.11.7
> 100% SCSI machine (4 discs - sda, sdb, sdc, sdd)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/bus/usb/devices
> S: Manufacturer=Eastman Kodak Comp
Hi there.
I'm trying to read the flash memory from my digital camera without success.
This is the scenario:
linux-2.6.11.7
100% SCSI machine (4 discs - sda, sdb, sdc, sdd)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/bus/usb/devices
T: Bus=01 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 2
B: Alloc= 0/
Ron Johnson, Jr. wrote:
|>> To use a Sony digital camera with my Debian laptop, all I had to do
|>> was to include this line in /etc/udev/udev.rules:
|>>
|>>BUS="scsi", SYSFS_vendor="Sony", NAME="camera"
|>
|> If you ever get another hot-pluggable Sony device, your rule
|> will fail. Be
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 14:52 -0800, Jim McCloskey wrote:
> Christian Convey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> |> I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into
> |> a Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the
Christian Convey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into
|> a Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the
|> following?
|>
|> When I plug in the camera, I assume there are thr
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 21:35 -0500, Christian Convey wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into a
> Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the following?
>
> When I plug in the camera, I assum
Hi guys,
I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into a
Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the following?
When I plug in the camera, I assume there are three devices that must be
created in the /dev directory, no?
#1 : a dev
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:35 -0500, Christian Convey wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm running Sarge / 2.6.8 kernel with udev installed. I've got a Kodak
> DX-series camera that connects via USB and whose name appears on
> digikam's list of supported cameras.
>
> Back when I was running Fedora Core 2/
On Monday 22 November 2004 10:35 am, Christian Convey wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm running Sarge / 2.6.8 kernel with udev installed. I've got a
> Kodak DX-series camera that connects via USB and whose name appears
> on digikam's list of supported cameras.
>
> Back when I was running Fedora Core 2/3,
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:35 -0500, Christian Convey wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm running Sarge / 2.6.8 kernel with udev installed. I've got a Kodak
> DX-series camera that connects via USB and whose name appears on
> digikam's list of supported cameras.
>
> Back when I was running Fedora Core 2/
> Is this supposed to be something that I have to wrestle to make work
> right, or is this something that in Sarge/2.6.8/udev is supposed to Just
> Work?
when i was running 2.6.8 the usb mass-storage was broken. plug in the
camera and see what 'dmesg' has to say.
either use 2.6.7 or 2.6.9. i r
On Monday 22 November 2004 10:35 am, Christian Convey wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm running Sarge / 2.6.8 kernel with udev installed. I've got a
> Kodak DX-series camera that connects via USB and whose name appears
> on digikam's list of supported cameras.
>
> Back when I was running Fedora Core 2/3,
Hey guys,
I'm running Sarge / 2.6.8 kernel with udev installed. I've got a Kodak
DX-series camera that connects via USB and whose name appears on
digikam's list of supported cameras.
Back when I was running Fedora Core 2/3, programs had no problem finding
me camera. Under Sarge, however, no lu
Tom Peters wrote:
Following the HOWTO's I try to mount my digital USB camera in the
following way:
sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /camera
mount: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device
May I ask what type of media your digital camera is using, and is it
removable? I ask this because I has tr
From: "Tom Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I don't get the proper name for the valid device from that.
> If I am not misguided by the manuals, there is a vfat filesystem on the
> memory card, and we are supposed to use the ide-scsi driver, so access it
> as a SCSI disk. As I said, that is how it w
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:22:11AM +0200, Tom Peters wrote:
> > Following the HOWTO's I try to mount my digital USB camera in the
> > following way:
> >
> > sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /camera
> > mount: /dev/sda1
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:22:11AM +0200, Tom Peters wrote:
> Following the HOWTO's I try to mount my digital USB camera in the
> following way:
>
> sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /camera
> mount: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device
>
> The mount table has:
> none o
Following the HOWTO's I try to mount my digital USB camera in the
following way:
sudo mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /camera
mount: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device
The mount table has:
none on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (rw,devuid=0,devgid=107,devmode=0660)
/proc/bus/usb/devices does s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Es Dijous 10 Juliol 2003 05:34, en Bret Comstock Waldow va escriure:
> There are at least two fundamentally different camera-to-computer
> systems, and thus at least two fundamentally different systems to figure
> out.
You're right, I've gave you too f
There are at least two fundamentally different camera-to-computer
systems, and thus at least two fundamentally different systems to figure
out.
Which do you have? What camera?
What commands does root try to access it?
Is it a usb mass storage device, or is it accessed through the gtkam or
eqiva
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo!
User belongs to USB group, but he cannot reach data in the photo camera (root
does).
I don't know what to check... help is appreciated !! ;)
TIA
- --
Joan Tur. Eivissa-Spain
AOL quini2k, ICQ 11407395
www.ClubIbosim.org
Linux: usuar
25:40 bilbo kernel: usb.c: USB device 2 (vend/prod 0x40a/0x100) is
not claimed by any active driver.
Jun 10 06:25:43 bilbo kernel: usb.c: registered new driver dc2xx
Jun 10 06:25:43 bilbo kernel: dc2xx.c: USB Camera #0 connected, major/minor
180/80
Jun 10 06:25:43 bilbo kernel: dc2xx.c: v1.0.0:USB Ca
Thomas H. George wrote:
I have a Sony with a memory stick which stores the images in jpeg
format. I had no trouble in configuring a 2.4.18 kernel to support usb
mass storage and adding /dev/sdb1 /sony vfat ro,users,noauto 0 0 to my fstab.
I already had append="hdd=ide-scsi" in lilo.conf under im
Craig Dickson wrote:
Tim wrote:
Is it the case that unless there is individual support for a model built
into the kernel, it won't be recognised? From this do I deduce that I
will be unable to mount my Nikon Coolpix E4300? And thus will need to
buy a CF card reader?
Well, a quick web searc
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 10:10:19AM +0100, Tim wrote:
> Tim wrote:
> >Olivier wrote:
> >
> >>scsi1 means it's /dev/sdb1 ?
> >
> >
> >mount: /dev/sdb1 is not a valid block device
> >
I have a Sony with a memory stick which stores the images in jpeg
format. I had no trouble in configuring a 2.4.18 k
Tim wrote:
> Is it the case that unless there is individual support for a model built
> into the kernel, it won't be recognised? From this do I deduce that I
> will be unable to mount my Nikon Coolpix E4300? And thus will need to
> buy a CF card reader?
Well, a quick web search turns up the
Tim wrote:
Olivier wrote:
scsi1 means it's /dev/sdb1 ?
mount: /dev/sdb1 is not a valid block device
Is it the case that unless there is individual support for a model built
into the kernel, it won't be recognised? From this do I deduce that I
will be unable to mount my Nikon Coolpix E4300?
Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
I have a cam too and when I want to connect it to the computer, I use
the /dev/sda1 device (scsi) like a vfat file system
I think you should have scsi support on kernel
I do believe that is set in my kernel config.
mount: /dev/sda1 is not a valid block device
#
Olivier wrote:
scsi1 means it's /dev/sdb1 ?
mount: /dev/sdb1 is not a valid block device
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a cam too and when I want to connect it to the computer, I use
the /dev/sda1 device (scsi) like a vfat file system.
I think you should have scsi support on kernel.
Regards.
El jue, 03 de 04 de 2003 a las 09:13, Tim escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I've compiled my kernel, mass storage as a module, an
Hi,
I've compiled my kernel, mass storage as a module, and all compact flash
media options enabled. Yet I cannot determine what device this camera
is set to, from which I can mount it. Does anyone have any clues? I've
attached 'tail /var/log/messages'.
TIA, Tim
Apr 3 08:03:21 debian xfs: i
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 15:03, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> being owner of a Pentax OPTIO for quite a while I would like to access
> the data on my camera from Linux. *The manufacturer is not interested
> in supporting me.* So, I contact you -- maybe anyone managed to
> attach this "nice" came
Lukas Ruf wrote:
> A personal hint: Do not buy a camera not explicitely supported by
> Linux (as I did) -- you can avoid a lot of frustration!
My preference is to use a media reader (compact flash, smart media, or
whatever is needed) that works with Linux. That way, I can choose a
camera based so
Lukas Ruf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> being owner of a Pentax OPTIO for quite a while I would like to access
> the data on my camera from Linux. *The manufacturer is not interested
> in supporting me.* So, I contact you -- maybe anyone managed to
> attach this "nice" camera to a Linux box.
>
> I am
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:03:43 +0200
Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> being owner of a Pentax OPTIO for quite a while I would like to access
> the data on my camera from Linux. *The manufacturer is not interested
> in supporting me.* So, I contact you -- maybe anyone managed t
* Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-02 22:03]:
> being owner of a Pentax OPTIO for quite a while I would like to access
> the data on my camera from Linux. *The manufacturer is not interested
> in supporting me.* So, I contact you -- maybe anyone managed to
> attach this "nice" camera to a L
Dear all,
being owner of a Pentax OPTIO for quite a while I would like to access
the data on my camera from Linux. *The manufacturer is not interested
in supporting me.* So, I contact you -- maybe anyone managed to
attach this "nice" camera to a Linux box.
I am running 2.4.20, all USB options a
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 15:03, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Alan Chandler wrote:
>
> > As a result of what you have done, you should see the contents of your
> > camera on /etc/sda1 (unless you already have scsi devices when it may
> > be something different.
>
> Only if the camera supports USB Mass Sto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 October 2002 8:03 pm, Craig Dickson wrote:
> What make/model of SmartMedia reader do you have?
Its a Belkin F5U141xMSD bought in the UK from www.dabs.com
> I've been looking for
> one that works under Linux.
With the debian hotplug
Alan Chandler wrote:
> As a result of what you have done, you should see the contents of your
> camera on /etc/sda1 (unless you already have scsi devices when it may
> be something different.
Only if the camera supports USB Mass Storage or is supported by some
other Linux kernel module, and he h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 October 2002 7:25 pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
> As a result of what you have done, you should see the contents of your
> camera on /etc/sda1 (unless you already have scsi devices when it may be
> something different.
Oops that should obvio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 October 2002 4:50 pm, DSC Siltec wrote:
> Okay, I have Debian, Woody, Hotplug, USB, and a cheap junk USB camera.
>
> How do I access my pics? I'd really like three answers:
>(1) How to access them directly as f
DSC Siltec wrote:
> Okay, I have Debian, Woody, Hotplug, USB, and a cheap junk USB camera.
>
> How do I access my pics? I'd really like three answers:
> (1) How to access them directly as files, if possible
> (2) Best way to download them as pictures, and save them
&
Okay, I have Debian, Woody, Hotplug, USB, and a cheap junk USB camera.
How do I access my pics? I'd really like three answers:
(1) How to access them directly as files, if possible
(2) Best way to download them as pictures, and save them
(3) How to create nice compressed .mpgs fr
97 matches
Mail list logo
