Hi Debian-user,
if you want to get a new RFID products supplier, i hope you can test our
products now,we can supply rfid cards,lables,tags,wristbands and so on.We
always can find out the suitable products with good price for you, waiting to
have your reply soon.
Best Regards
On 11/11/2017 10:08 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:26 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Laurent Lyaudet
wrote:
Hello,
When I go to :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/11/threads.html
there is this message at the end of the web
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:26 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Laurent Lyaudet
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> When I go to :
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/11/threads.html
>> there is this message at the end of the webpage :
>> "The last update was on 2
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Laurent Lyaudet
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I go to :
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/11/threads.html
> there is this message at the end of the webpage :
> "The last update was on 23:20 GMT Thu Nov 09. There are 348 messages. Page
> 1 of 1."
> It used
Hello,
When I go to :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/11/threads.html
there is this message at the end of the webpage :
"The last update was on 23:20 GMT Thu Nov 09. There are 348 messages.
Page 1 of 1."
It used to be refreshed every 20 minutes but it doesn't seem to work
anymore.
I
For recent posts go to https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/recent .
For posts of last few decades see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ .
Links to useful (even fascinating) info at
https://lists.debian.org/ .
Enjoy.
What's the easiest and/or simplest part of Linux Kernel?
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> Friend, it would be better to give us Message-ID, not the whole message.
> And, btw, why don't you use archives or NNTP to check it yourself?
Thank you, I shall post just
ogle's site:l.d.o search, which also failed to find the thread, when
I used what looked like a unique phrase. Sorry about my search-fu.)
Thanks all,
Zenaan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/526d6b23.7040...@meetinghouse.net
Zenaan Harkness writes:
> Can anyone tell me where my email went - see below - ??
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Zenaan Harkness
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
> Subject: Re: What's the easiest and/or simplest part of Linux Ke
> 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
Is this thread that old or was it sent with a wrong date? Have you
searched the archive? I guess the list's admin can't help.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Zenaan Harkness
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
> Subject: Re: What's the easiest and/or simplest part of Linux Kernel?
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Snipped, to long to read. Sometimes it takes a while for a mail to come
through
s the easiest and/or simplest part of Linux Kernel?
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 8/31/13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 8/30/2013 10:44 AM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 30.08.2013 15:11, Jerry Stuckle a écrit :
>>> On 8/30/2013 2:00 AM, Joel Rees
osts aren't marked as spam by Debian filters.
I'm sure there could be other reasons that your mail isn't getting
through though.
--
Harry Prevor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
agian...@gmail.com wrote:
> Also, I see two posts from you on the list, from yesterday.
Thanks, Alan. I made four posts yesterday, and two more this morning that did
not make it through.
The part I don't like is that a few of the posts had solutions in them!
If I wanted to be paranoid I would sa
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:22:51 -0400
amber gilchrist wrote:
Hello amber,
>If you can see this post on debian-user, can you reply to it and cc my
>email directly? I suppose only one person needs to do this... I have
>been looking at the debian-user archives and none of the posts I've
>made last nig
If you can see this post on debian-user, can you reply to it and cc my email
directly? I suppose only one person needs to do this...
I have been looking at the debian-user archives and none of the posts I've made
last night or today have been showing up...
Thanks!
amber
implified header) are publicly available in the list archive :-)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.01.14.10.13...@gmail.com
On Jo, 13 ian 11, 12:09:58, Camaleón wrote:
>
> OTOH, I would contact the Debian mailing list admin
> (listmaster[at]lists.debian.org) so he/she can check the internal mailing
^^
This munging is not really needed. First, the e-mail is present in all
messages and second, Debian,
account (aka: another
> smtp server) for posting or even use the Gmane web interface:
>
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user
As you see, the Gmane suggestion worked. Thanks again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
tp server) for posting or even use the Gmane web interface:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user
Remember that you are not required to be subscribed to the list for
sending e-mails.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Ma, 27 iul 10, 23:43:07, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> I read debian-user locally via a mail-to-news gateway, which makes it
> much more hassle for me to sign messages.
Joke aside, I'd rather you continue reading debian-user, so whatever
works for you is good ;)
Kudos to you and the other DDs[1]
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 16:19 -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
> sent 4:18 PM, EST 12/1/08
>
> and I am subscribed to whitelist.
>
>
> --
> Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
Replying as requested by my hosted site.
--
Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 13:34 +, Bob Cox wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 21:03:36 -0500, Damon L. Chesser ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > Testing for my rely. Sorry for the noise, there will be no more follow
> > ups by me if this goes through
> >
> > 1/12/08 21:03 EST
>
> I think you m
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 13:34 +, Bob Cox wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 21:03:36 -0500, Damon L. Chesser ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > Testing for my rely. Sorry for the noise, there will be no more follow
> > ups by me if this goes through
> >
> > 1/12/08 21:03 EST
>
> I think you m
Am 2008-12-03 13:34:08, schrieb Bob Cox:
> 21:03:36 -0500 is 02:03:36 UTC so it seems that damtek.com did not pass
> on the message to liszt.debian.org for over eight hours.
Is there a header about geylisting? -- do this excessiv!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 13:34:08 +, Bob Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 21:03:36 -0500 is 02:03:36 UTC so it seems that damtek.com did not pass
> on the message to liszt.debian.org for over eight hours.
Shame I can't do simple maths. Six hours, not eight.
--
Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 21:03:36 -0500, Damon L. Chesser ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Testing for my rely. Sorry for the noise, there will be no more follow
> ups by me if this goes through
>
> 1/12/08 21:03 EST
I think you mean 2/12/08 ;-)
But there is still something odd going on. The hea
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 16:19 -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
> sent 4:18 PM, EST 12/1/08
>
> and I am subscribed to whitelist.
>
>
> --
> Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
Testing for my rely. Sorry for the noise, there will be no more follow
ups by me if this goes through
1/12/08 21:
sent 4:18 PM, EST 12/1/08
and I am subscribed to whitelist.
--
Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 08:43 +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 16:41:49 PM -0400, Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Frans, Cord, Martin, Pascal,
> >
> > I'm writing the listmasters because reading debian-user has become
> > nearly unbearable for me (one of the sadly few DDs wh
Mark Grieveson wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to gmane.linux.debian.user:
> I almost never make offtopic posts. I get the digest, and go through
> it for items of interest, occasionally asking for help, and sometimes
> attempting to offer assistance.
When replying to messages in the
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 00:50 -0400, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> Offtopic posts do not bother me. The idea of moderation, however, I
> feel is repulsive. So, my recommendation is to continue the list as a
> free and unmoderated list.
>
> That concludes my two cents.
>
> Mark
>
>
I agree with Mark.
I almost never make offtopic posts. I get the digest, and go through
it for items of interest, occasionally asking for help, and sometimes
attempting to offer assistance.
Offtopic posts do not bother me. The idea of moderation, however, I
feel is repulsive. So, my recommendation is to continue
On 5/22/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I thought that our OT discussion was fairly polite. Vigorously
argued, but fairly civil. Certainly the people complaining weren't
flamed.
I haven't been following the longer threads, so I really couldn't say.
The code of conduct could certain
the kinds of subject matter that once made it useful.
> >
> I'd sort of be happy to get back to off topic discussions.
>
> At this point this meta-topic "rampant offtopic and offensive posts to
> debian-user" seems to be dominating list traffic.
>
> From the
On Tue, 22 May 2007 11:31:58 -0400
"Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's why I suggest a writen code of conduct / policy that covers OT
> > and other issues, that is then self-regulated by the users of the list.
>
> You
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Celejar wrote:
> Lots of sigs are "derogatory of another culture" - those mocking
> religion, or liberal / conservative / other political views.
It may help people to remember that another person cannot define you or
tell anyone who you are, what kind of culture you are p
On Tue, 22 May 2007 10:25:25 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:46:09AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > I see your point about offensiveness, but I'll point out that the OT
> > thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a response to a sig that I felt
> > a
On Tue, 22 May 2007 10:18:59 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:01PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > So, then, lets say that a member of Islam has a very "provocative, but
> > very accepted in their culture, quote."
>
> I assume that you mean a
On Tue, May 22, 2007 06:08:41 AM -0400, Miles Fidelman
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> >(*) yes, the moderators, that is listmasters or whatever you want to
> >call them. I have read your objection that this is a not moderated
> >list, but it is irrelevant. My proposal was to ban
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:49 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:59:01 -0400
> Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 21 May 2007, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sat, 19 May 2007 17:02:01 +0200
> > > "M. Fioretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > This
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:41 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans, Cord, Martin, Pascal,
>
> I'm writing the listmasters because reading debian-user has become
> nearly unbearable for me (one of the sadly few DDs who bothers to read
> our user lists) due to volume and offensiveness/repetativeness of
> o
On 5/22/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's why I suggest a writen code of conduct / policy that covers OT
and other issues, that is then self-regulated by the users of the list.
You mean like http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct ?
Granted, it doesn't cover O
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:08:41AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> There's a legal issue here that nobody's mentioned.
>
> At least in the US, there is a growing body of law and precedent that
> says, essentially:
>
> - if you provide a list, but don't moderate traffic, you're not legally
> l
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:46:09AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> I see your point about offensiveness, but I'll point out that the OT
> thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a response to a sig that I felt
> attacked religion unfairly. Many people use quite provocative sigs,
> ridiculing (often wittil
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:01PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> So, then, lets say that a member of Islam has a very "provocative, but
> very accepted in their culture, quote."
I assume that you mean as a signature. In the body of a message it
would only be appropriate if the recipient of the m
topic discussions.
At this point this meta-topic "rampant offtopic and offensive posts to
debian-user" seems to be dominating list traffic.
From the archives, as of a few minutes ago:
- total messages today (5/22): 69
- total re: "rampant offtopic and offensive posts to debian-us
On Monday 21 May 2007 22:48, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote to Marco:
> Seriously, searching the list archives for your email reveals
> that aside from pointing out to someone who posted to this
> list in Italian that this is an English-only list, pretty
> much every single message you have posted has be
On Tue, 22 May 2007 06:58:19 +0200
"M. Fioretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 10:46:09 AM -0400, Celejar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > I'll point out that the OT thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a
> > response to a sig that I felt attacked religion unfairly. Many
>
On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:59:01 -0400
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 21 May 2007, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 May 2007 17:02:01 +0200
> > "M. Fioretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > This is why I'm posting also this reply to the moderators. I really
> > > h
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 08:15:56PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007 00:47:38 +0200
> David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:46:09AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I see your point about offensiveness, but I'll point out that the OT
> > > threa
M. Fioretti wrote:
(*) yes, the moderators, that is listmasters or whatever you want to
call them. I have read your objection that this is a not moderated
list, but it is irrelevant. My proposal was to ban outright your email
or IP addresses, not to hold and check each single email sent to the
li
On May 22, 7:40 am, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I fail to understand is what difference does it make if text is
> above or below a sig delimiter? Either it is offensive or it is not. I
> and others have been blasted for supposedly offensive remarks. However,
> if you re
On Tue, 22 May 2007 01:33:53 -0400
Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I fail to understand is what difference does it make if text is
> above or below a sig delimiter?
It doesn't.
> Either it is offensive or it is not.
What is offensive or isn't is entirely up to the reader.
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:58:19AM +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 10:46:09 AM -0400, Celejar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > I'll point out that the OT thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a
> > response to a sig that I felt attacked religion unfairly. Many
> > people use qu
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:34:25AM +, s. keeling wrote:
> Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:31:12PM +, s. keeling wrote:
> > >
> > > No. Think about what you're saying. Sigs are a time honoured
> > > practice, and if you don't like one, hit delete an
On Mon, May 21, 2007 10:46:09 AM -0400, Celejar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I'll point out that the OT thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a
> response to a sig that I felt attacked religion unfairly. Many
> people use quite provocative sigs, ridiculing (often wittily)
> political or religious
Gnu_Raiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >"M. Fioretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Please avoid this kind of technical suggestions in this thread:
>
> >* it is still the same unacceptable "since you can buy ear plugs, I
> > can yell whenever I want" attitude. See my previous messages
>
> I think it
Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:31:12PM +, s. keeling wrote:
> > Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a response to a sig that I felt
> > > attacked religion unfairly. Many people use quite provocative sigs,
>
On Mon, 21 May 2007 16:31:12 GMT
"s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I see your point about offensiveness, but I'll point out that the OT
> > thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a response to a sig that I felt
> > attacked religion unfairly. Many p
On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:31:01 -0400
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 08:36 +, steef wrote:
> > Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > <.>
> > > As a side note I must say that I have been a member
On Tue, 22 May 2007 00:47:38 +0200
David Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:46:09AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > [...]
> > I see your point about offensiveness, but I'll point out that the OT
> > thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a response to a sig that I felt
> > a
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:46:09AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> [...]
> I see your point about offensiveness, but I'll point out that the OT
> thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a response to a sig that I felt
> attacked religion unfairly. Many people use quite provocative sigs,
> ridiculing (often
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:53:44AM -0700, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >So, let me see if I understand this. The things for which Michelle,
> >Ron, Michael, Johannes, Judd, Florian and I were criticized, because
> >they were supposedly offensive, would be OK as long as t
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
So, let me see if I understand this. The things for which Michelle,
Ron, Michael, Johannes, Judd, Florian and I were criticized, because
they were supposedly offensive, would be OK as long as they were in a
sig?
If they also honored the four-line sig netiquette, y
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:31:12PM +, s. keeling wrote:
> Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I see your point about offensiveness, but I'll point out that the OT
> > thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a response to a sig that I felt
> > attacked religion unfairly. Many people use quit
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 08:51:30AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:50:27PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:44:10PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > >
> > > It would be helpful if that code of conduct had its own page and be
> >
Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I see your point about offensiveness, but I'll point out that the OT
> thread I started (Good, evil, etc) was a response to a sig that I felt
> attacked religion unfairly. Many people use quite provocative sigs,
> ridiculing (often wittily) political or religio
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 02:22 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On 05/21/2007 01:55 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Just in case you missed my initial proposal, I was suggesting a separate
> > list for OT, but still within the Debian project. This way when OT gets
> > out of hand posters could move the thre
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 08:36 +, steef wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > <.>
> > As a side note I must say that I have been a member of a volunteer
> > organization for 11 years and I have seen a bit of the dynamic inv
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:51:17PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) writes:
>
> > IMHO forcing people to take off-topic discussions out of the forum
> > (read Debian community) is not good. Debian is based on volunteers
> > and for some contributors (yes, answering que
On Monday 21 May 2007, Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2007 17:02:01 +0200
> "M. Fioretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > This is why I'm posting also this reply to the moderators. I really
> > hope they put a stop to this, this time.
>
> As people have pointed out; this is exactly the
On Sat, 19 May 2007 17:02:01 +0200
"M. Fioretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> This is why I'm posting also this reply to the moderators. I really
> hope they put a stop to this, this time.
As people have pointed out; this is exactly the issue. There *are no*
moderators! d-u is (currently)
On Sat, 19 May 2007 08:44:09 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:11:37PM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
>
> > However, I do think it would be good to add language to the description
> > of the mailing list that suggests that people take off-topic
> > conv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) writes:
> IMHO forcing people to take off-topic discussions out of the forum
> (read Debian community) is not good. Debian is based on volunteers
> and for some contributors (yes, answering questions is also a way of
> contributing, so you - the DDs - don't have
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:50:27PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:44:10PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > It would be helpful if that code of conduct had its own page and be
> > enumerated so that it could be referred to directly when we try to
> > self-
On 05/21/2007 01:55 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:19:12AM +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
If the volume of messages in an off-topic thread is large enough that
an entire separate list is being considered, the off-top
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
<.>
As a side note I must say that I have been a member of a volunteer
organization for 11 years and I have seen a bit of the dynamic involved
in such a group. The best "contributors" were mostly the
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Joey is, I believe, referring to a healthy level of off-topic
> discussions on *any* list, not to creating a specific area for
> "off-topic" messages. For the messages to be "social lubricant", they
> need to be *interspersed* with the
On Mon, May 21, 2007 09:55:22 AM +0300, Andrei Popescu
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> By forum I meant whole Debian, not this list (should have put some
> quotes around).
>
> > Of course. How can you ask such a ridiculous question? Please think a
> > bit more before posting. First of all, going by
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:19:12AM +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > If the volume of messages in an off-topic thread is large enough that
> > > an entire separate list is being considered, the off-topic diversion
> > > is already beyo
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:59:15PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:43:45PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> > Agreed. It may be a good idea to add to the mailing lists code of
> > conduct a couple of extra lines:
> >
> > A lot of questions asked on debian-user
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:44:10PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> It would be helpful if that code of conduct had its own page and be
> enumerated so that it could be referred to directly when we try to
> self-regulate. Eg: "Yoh WhatsYourName, this topic, while interesting in
> a general s
On Sun, May 20, 2007 22:15:34 PM +0300, Andrei Popescu
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > If the volume of messages in an off-topic thread is large enough that
> > an entire separate list is being considered, the off-topic diversion
> > is
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> >> Joey is, I believe, referring to a healthy level of off-topic
> >> discussions on *any* list, not to creating a specific area for
> >> "off-topic" messages. For
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:58:37PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 May 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > It would be helpful if that code of conduct had its own page and
> > > be enumerated so that it could be referred to directly
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:34:55PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:34:50PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > This type of guideline means a whole heck of a lot more than large
> > sweeping corrections. Plus, we do need someone to thwack the
> > responder(s) from time
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:34:50PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> This type of guideline means a whole heck of a lot more than large
> sweeping corrections. Plus, we do need someone to thwack the
> responder(s) from time to time. Many could do this, specifically and
> privately over private e-mail.
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Joey is, I believe, referring to a healthy level of off-topic
discussions on *any* list, not to creating a specific area for
"off-topic" messages. For the messages to be "social lubricant", they
need to be *in
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:58:37PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Sunday 20 May 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> > It would be helpful if that code of conduct had its own page and be
> > enumerated so that it could be referred to directly when we try to
> > self-regulate. Eg: "Yoh WhatsYourNa
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:51:08AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> > This particular problem is solved for the most part by a policy
> > change that says non-Debian topics are inappropriate. This opens
> > the door to various actions starting with "thi
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:58:02AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:49:14 -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:15:53PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at
On 05/20/2007 01:44 PM, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
[...]
I propose we add a clause to the code of conduct to address the OT
issue. This half of the problem is generally followed but it should be
part of policy. The following wording is a starting point for discussion:
Discussions whic
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 11:57:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Joey is, I believe, referring to a healthy level of off-topic
> discussions on *any* list, not to creating a specific area for
> "off-topic" messages. For the messages to be "social lubricant", they
> need to be *interspersed* with the
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:43:45PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Agreed. It may be a good idea to add to the mailing lists code of
> conduct a couple of extra lines:
>
> A lot of questions asked on debian-user and debian-devel are asked
> regularly. Please consider searching using an Inter
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:51:08AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> This particular problem is solved for the most part by a policy change
> that says non-Debian topics are inappropriate. This opens the door to
> various actions starting with "this is not appropriate, please stop" in
> the event that f
On 18-May-07, 15:41 (CDT), Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frans, Cord, Martin, Pascal,
>
> I'm writing the listmasters because reading debian-user has become
> nearly unbearable for me (one of the sadly few DDs who bothers to read
> our user lists) due to volume and offensiveness/repetati
On Saturday 19 May 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:50:31PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 May 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:17:16PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > > > Did it ever occur to you that there is a reason for "ba
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 11:43:08PM +, Tyler Smith wrote:
>
> I think you missed Amy's point. It's great that there are
> technical solutions to the OT problem. However, if we take that as
> license to continue posting messages that are far, far removed from
> the world of Debian, we are going
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
