On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 12:28, Doug MacFarlane wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2002, 16:38:15, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:30:22PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > I am sure Baloo meant a "rogue" IT staff member. :-) And rogue is
> > > probably the best way to learn the classic vi keystroke
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 18:28, Doug MacFarlane wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2002, 16:38:15, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:30:22PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > I am sure Baloo meant a "rogue" IT staff member. :-) And rogue is
> > > probably the best way to learn the classic vi keystroke
On 12 Oct 2002, 16:38:15, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:30:22PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I am sure Baloo meant a "rogue" IT staff member. :-) And rogue is
> > probably the best way to learn the classic vi keystrokes. :-)
>
> Yes, I meant rogue. Also, if it weren't for ro
Jens writes:
> Free Software without the concept of "giving what you can, getting what
> you need" is a rather strange thought.
Your definition of Free Software differs markedly from mine.
> So strange that I suspect what you really need is to look up "socialist"
> in a dictionary.
I am aware o
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 11:33, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If I believed that there was anything "Socialist" about Free Software I
> > would cease contributing to it.
>
> Free Software without the concept of "giving what you can, getting
> what you need" is
also sprach Jens Grivolla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.14.1733 +0200]:
> > If I believed that there was anything "Socialist" about Free Software I
> > would cease contributing to it.
>
> Free Software without the concept of "giving what you can, getting
> what you need" is a rather strange though
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I believed that there was anything "Socialist" about Free Software I
> would cease contributing to it.
Free Software without the concept of "giving what you can, getting
what you need" is a rather strange thought. So strange that I suspect
what you r
also sprach John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.14.1655 +0200]:
> If I believed that there was anything "Socialist" about Free Software I
> would cease contributing to it.
[taking this off-list. mail me if interested]
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debi
martin f. krafft writes:
> It's part of the reason why I use it, too.
If I believed that there was anything "Socialist" about Free Software I
would cease contributing to it.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 02:41:41 -0700
From: Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 07:32:27AM +1000, David Pastern wrote:
>> what i'm talking about. My former bosses opinion of Linux was that it was a
>> piece of *hit and you couldn't get any support for it, and device driver
Barney Wrightson wrote
>
> PS. God I wish I could use linux on my workstation here, if not for
> cygwin/vim/gimp I'd go (completely) mad.
My solution was to quit the job where they forced me to use Windows, and
take a job where I can use
any operating system I like. Got lucky...
--
To
nate wrote:
>ACK. I *HATED* when people did this. Taking a screenshot, a perfectly
>normal graphics file and shoving it into a word document! Is it so
>hard for people to paste it into Paint and save it as a BMP ? then
>use IE to convert it to JPG?
>
I was keeping a detailed log that happened t
Oooh, that's high quality! It sends the image to stdout for piping. :)
ijt
martin f krafft wrote:
>also sprach Issac Trotts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.10.1919 +0200]:
>
>
>>... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
>>like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Wor
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:19:45AM -0700, Issac Trotts happened to mention:
> ... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
> like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a
> nice way to keep track of changes to some graphics software I was
> working on.
nate wrote:
> Kirk Strauser said:
>
>>At 2002-10-10T17:58:56Z, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>>ACK. I *HATED* when people did this. Taking a screenshot, a perfectly
>>>normal graphics file and shoving it into a word document!
>>
>>What if the purpose of the screenshot was to illustrat
David Pastern wrote:
>
>If a .jpeg file image is what I want all is fine. If not i'll use a program
>called xnview (freely available from www.xnview.com) to convert the image.
>
>Dave
>
>
>
The gimp also saves to many other formats.
There are also free software programs available in Debian t
here's a way to do something like this in
> X...
>
> Issac
>
>
>
>
Hmmm - the only thing I miss about Windows is the time to catch up on
household chores - like cleaning the Windows - during the numerous
system crashes!
--
Mark L. Kahnt, FLMI/M, ALHC, HIA, AIAA, AC
t: Thursday, 10 October 2002 3:19 AM
To: Debian User; David Pastern
Subject: The only thing I miss about Windows
... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a
nice way to keep track of changes to some grap
Kirk Strauser said:
>
> At 2002-10-10T17:58:56Z, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> ACK. I *HATED* when people did this. Taking a screenshot, a perfectly
>> normal graphics file and shoving it into a word document!
>
> What if the purpose of the screenshot was to illustrate a piece of text
>
At 2002-10-10T17:58:56Z, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ACK. I *HATED* when people did this. Taking a screenshot, a perfectly
> normal graphics file and shoving it into a word document!
What if the purpose of the screenshot was to illustrate a piece of text that
you're concurrently workin
Issac Trotts said:
> ... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something like
> Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a nice way to
> keep track of changes to some graphics software I was
> working on. I wonder if there's a way to do something like this in X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Jeudi 10 Octobre 2002 19:19, Issac Trotts a écrit :
> ... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
> like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a
> nice way to keep track of changes to some graphics sof
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:19:45AM -0700, Issac Trotts wrote:
> ... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
> like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a
> nice way to keep track of changes to some graphics software I was
> working on. I wonder if t
-- Issac Trotts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 10 October 2002, 10:19 AM -0700):
> ... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
> like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a
> nice way to keep track of changes to some graphics software I was
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 01:19, Issac Trotts wrote:
> ... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
> like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a
> nice way to keep track of changes to some graphics software I was
> working on. I wonder if there's a way
also sprach Issac Trotts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.10.1919 +0200]:
> ... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
> like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a
> nice way to keep track of changes to some graphics software I was
> working on. I won
... is being able to capture the contents of a window with something
like Ctrl+PrtScn and then paste it into a Word document. It was a
nice way to keep track of changes to some graphics software I was
working on. I wonder if there's a way to do something like this in
X...
Issac
--
To UNSUB
27 matches
Mail list logo
