On Thu 06 Apr 2023 at 15:37:24 (+0200), zithro wrote:
> On 06 Apr 2023 01:30, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 01 Apr 2023 at 11:58:49 (+0530), Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> > > My present Debian system installed from "Official Debian GNU/Linux
> > > Live 11.6.0 lxde 2022-12-17T11:46"
> > >
> > > While ins
On 06 Apr 2023 01:30, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 01 Apr 2023 at 11:58:49 (+0530), Susmita/Rajib wrote:
My present Debian system installed from "Official Debian GNU/Linux
Live 11.6.0 lxde 2022-12-17T11:46"
While installing a package I receive this following message:
W: Download is performed uns
Bottomline:
---
The very question :
[Quote]
How to get rid of the synaptic message (mentioned below) at the end of
installing a package?
[EndQuote]
becomes immaterial as, like Mr. Davidson so discreetly mentions, THIS IS A BUG.
SO, MAY THIS THREAD BE TREATED AS CLOSED.
Best wishes
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to get rid of the synaptic message (mentioned
below) at the end of installing a package?
From: David Wright
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 18:30:24 -0500
Message-id:
Reply-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <
On Sat 01 Apr 2023 at 11:58:49 (+0530), Susmita/Rajib wrote:
> My present Debian system installed from "Official Debian GNU/Linux
> Live 11.6.0 lxde 2022-12-17T11:46"
>
> While installing a package I receive this following message:
>
> W: Download is performed unsandboxed as root as file
> '/root
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How to get rid of the synaptic message (mentioned
below) at the end of installing a package?
From: davidson
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 03:10:28 + (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.deb.2.21.2304030310190.28...@azone.org>
In-re
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 Susmita/Rajib wrote:
My illustrious team leaders and senior debian-user list-members,
My present Debian system installed from "Official Debian GNU/Linux
Live 11.6.0 lxde 2022-12-17T11:46"
While installing a package I receive this following message:
I do not use synaptic, an
My illustrious team leaders and senior debian-user list-members,
My present Debian system installed from "Official Debian GNU/Linux
Live 11.6.0 lxde 2022-12-17T11:46"
While installing a package I receive this following message:
W: Download is performed unsandboxed as root as file
'/root/.synapti
Greg wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:42:31PM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, songbird wrote:
>>
>> > kudoes to everyone who helped with this in getting it done, finding
>> > bugs, fixing problems, converting code, updating docs and testing. :)
>> >
>>
>> What does debian u
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:42:31PM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, songbird wrote:
>
> > kudoes to everyone who helped with this in getting it done, finding
> > bugs, fixing problems, converting code, updating docs and testing. :)
> >
>
> What does debian use for moinmoin? Is
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023, songbird wrote:
kudoes to everyone who helped with this in getting it done, finding
bugs, fixing problems, converting code, updating docs and testing. :)
What does debian use for moinmoin? Is the debian wiki stuck on buster?
kudoes to everyone who helped with this in getting it done, finding
bugs, fixing problems, converting code, updating docs and testing. :)
songbird
Just attached failure screenshot:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/soyeomul/stuff/master/tunnel-broker-said-20170818.png
Thanks!!!
--
^고맙습니다 _救濟蒼生_ 감사합니다_^))//
Dear Eike,
Eike Lantzsch 께서 쓰시길,
《記事 全文 <1677989.mZZlnEaY7I@lxcl01> 에서》:
> in that case it might help to install he.net - Network Tools by Hurricane
> Electric on your smartphone to analyze the problem further.
#+BEGIN_TXT 1st
Local IPv6 Devices (by NDP)
# This router is "Samsung Galaxy S
me, indeed ...
>
> Sincerely, Byung-Hee.
Dear Byung-Hee,
in that case it might help to install he.net - Network Tools by Hurricane
Electric on your smartphone to analyze the problem further.
It might be that you are not yet at the end of your tether.
I wish you success
Eike
--
Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE
Dear Eike,
Eike Lantzsch 께서 쓰시길,
《記事 全文 <1768501.bNH75oQlMl@lxcl01> 에서》:
> Don't know if this is relevant:
> I had the problem of not pingable IP with my cable-ISP. ISP told me that they
> are not blocking anything. Turned out that the Motorola cable modem blocked
> the ICMP packages and it c
On Wednesday, 16 August 2017 20:03:31 -04 Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희, 黃 炳熙) wrote:
> >> B. You have a tunnel account for IPv6 service.
>
> Just i did try, but the tunnel broker said:
>
> "IP is not ICMP pingable. Please make sure ICMP is not blocked."
>
> Well i have no lucky for IPv6, thanks!!!
>
>
>> B. You have a tunnel account for IPv6 service.
Just i did try, but the tunnel broker said:
"IP is not ICMP pingable. Please make sure ICMP is not blocked."
Well i have no lucky for IPv6, thanks!!!
Sincerely, Byung-Hee.
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
On 2016-07-19 16:13, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I don't think so. I can't think of a reason the installer would ever
ask for the MAC, unless you are talking some odd ball ARM hardware that
didn't have a MAC in hardware and required the user to provide one.
But would Debian have even had an installe
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:45:58AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Not me.
> And I think there was never such bug as asking for MAC details from the User.
I have certainly never seen it, and don't recall any such thing in any
installer I have used since 2.0.
> In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:08:47PM +, shirish ??? wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody remember which release of Debian was it that had the bug
> where d-i used to ask for MAC ID details during the end phase
> (networking phase) to the user and if s/he didn&#x
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 18:08, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody remember which release of Debian was it that had the bug
> where d-i used to ask for MAC ID details during the end phase
> (networking phase) to the user and if s/he didn't know the MAC ID
> d
Hi all,
Does anybody remember which release of Debian was it that had the bug
where d-i used to ask for MAC ID details during the end phase
(networking phase) to the user and if s/he didn't know the MAC ID
details the installation couldn't move further (unless one knew some
tricks).
I
-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Installer crash at the end of installation
Resent-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 22:25:20 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 05/11/2016 07:41 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:20:16PM +, Albin Otterh?ll
On 05/11/2016 07:41 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:20:16PM +, Albin Otterhäll wrote:
I'm trying to install Debian on a Lenovo Thinkpad T430. This is not the
first time I install Debian on this machine, no problems earlier. The
problem is that the installer crash at th
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:20:16PM +, Albin Otterhäll wrote:
> I'm trying to install Debian on a Lenovo Thinkpad T430. This is not the
> first time I install Debian on this machine, no problems earlier. The
> problem is that the installer crash at the end of the "[
On Wed 11 May 2016 at 19:17:26 +, Albin Otterhäll wrote:
> I'm trying to install Debian on a Lenovo Thinkpad T430. This is not the
> first time I install Debian on this machine, no problems earlier. The
> problem is that the installer crash at the end of the "[s]elect and
I'm trying to install Debian on a Lenovo Thinkpad T430. This is not the
first time I install Debian on this machine, no problems earlier. The
problem is that the installer crash at the end of the "[s]elect and install
packages" step. All the packages have been downloaded and m
I'm trying to install Debian on a Lenovo Thinkpad T430. This is not the
first time I install Debian on this machine, no problems earlier. The
problem is that the installer crash at the end of the "[s]elect and
install packages" step. All the packages have been downloaded and mo
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 12:49 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> > On 04/16/2016 03:27 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>
> >> Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15
> >> April 2016, the beginnin
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> On 04/16/2016 03:27 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15
> > April 2016, the beginning of the end began for Wheezy. Google, as
> > announced months ago, finall
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:30:43AM -0400, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> You are missing that the change to systemd makes most of the knowledge
> patiently acquired over the years running and caring for a Linux system has
> suddenly become unusable.
As a former sysadmin wrangling frankly horrid in-house
On 04/19/2016 12:49 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
On 04/16/2016 03:27 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15 April
2016, the beginning of the end began for Wheezy. Google, as announced
months ago, finally ceased support for its browser on W
On 04/16/2016 03:27 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15 April 2016, the beginning of the
end began for Wheezy. Google, as announced months ago, finally ceased support for its browser on
Wheezy. I double checked just to be sure, and i
; > > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 09:34:05AM +1000, Paul Trevethan wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:27:17 -0700
> > > > > Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yest
t; > On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:27:17 -0700
> > > > Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on
> > > > > 15 April 2016, the beginning of the end began for Wheezy.
> > > > >
- no extraneous crap
> > like you get and never use, and can't uninstall due to dependencies
> > of the desktop environment.
> >
> > My objection to systemd is philosophical: It's contrary to the Unix
> > credo of simplicity, an OS busybody as it were.
> &g
I can't speak for anyone else, but I found systemd to be ridiculously
counterintuitive and poorly documented when I was first exposed to it. To this
day, the standard GUI configurator for it (systemadm) is so limited as to be
nearly useless; and I find hand-configuring a new service to be a maj
rote:
> > >
> > > > Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15
> > > > April 2016, the beginning of the end began for Wheezy. Google, as
> > > > announced months ago, finally ceased support for its browser on
> > > > Whe
On Apr 17, 2016, at 5:30 AM, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI
wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 11:48:16 +
> Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
>> It seems the emotions, even now, are running too high to be simply about
>> "if it ain't broke don't fix it". What am I missing?
>
> You are missing that the change to sy
to be keep it simple, and have one program do one single job very well,
and then combine those programs to get the end result that you wanted.
Not so much any more. Nevertheless, IMHO Linux is far superior to the
other options available, and Debian for all of the criticism I've seen
about i
15
> > > April 2016, the beginning of the end began for Wheezy. Google, as
> > > announced months ago, finally ceased support for its browser on
> > > Wheezy. I double checked just to be sure, and in the course of
> > > that check also discovered "offici
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Michael Milliman wrote:
>
>
> On 04/16/2016 07:52 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >> > >choice of inits as a standard option during installs on future
> >> > >releases, but I very much doubt it.
> >> > >
> >> > >B
> >> > >
> > >
> I use Linux Mint on one of my machines. It is i
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Go Linux wrote:
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:27:17 -0700
> From: Patrick Bartek
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Beginning of the End for Wheezy [sigh!]
> >
> > Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15
> &g
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 09:34:05AM +1000, Paul Trevethan wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:27:17 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15 April
> > 2016, the beginning of the end began for Wheezy. Google, a
On Sunday, April 17, 2016, Renaud OLGIATI
wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 11:48:16 +
> Mark Fletcher > wrote:
>
> > It seems the emotions, even now, are running too high to be simply about
> > "if it ain't broke don't fix it". What am I missing?
>
> You are missing that the change to systemd mak
On 04/17/2016 07:00 AM, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
On Sunday 17 April 2016 11:48:16 Mark Fletcher wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:19 PM Michael Milliman <
michael.e.milli...@gmail.com> wrote:
I've never really
liked systemd, though I must admit it does work and do the job -- I just
like the simpl
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 11:48:16 +
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> It seems the emotions, even now, are running too high to be simply about
> "if it ain't broke don't fix it". What am I missing?
You are missing that the change to systemd makes most of the knowledge
patiently acquired over the years runn
On Sunday 17 April 2016 11:48:16 Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:19 PM Michael Milliman <
>
> michael.e.milli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've never really
> > liked systemd, though I must admit it does work and do the job -- I just
> > like the simplicity of the init system better.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:19 PM Michael Milliman <
michael.e.milli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've never really
> liked systemd, though I must admit it does work and do the job -- I just
> like the simplicity of the init system better. Admittedly, I may well
> be undereducated on systemd resulting
On 04/16/2016 07:52 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >choice of inits as a standard option during installs on future
> >releases, but I very much doubt it.
> >
> >B
> >
>
I use Linux Mint on one of my machines. It is init based, not systemd,
and has Debian and Ubuntu as it's underpinnings. All o
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Paul Trevethan wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:27:17 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15
> > April 2016, the beginning of the end began for Wheezy. Google, as
> > announced mo
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:27:17 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15 April
> 2016, the beginning of the end began for Wheezy. Google, as announced
> months ago, finally ceased support for its browser on Wheezy. I
> double c
Much to my regret (and others, too, I'm sure), yesterday, on 15 April 2016, the
beginning of the end began for Wheezy. Google, as announced months ago, finally
ceased support for its browser on Wheezy. I double checked just to be sure,
and in the course of that check also discovered &quo
On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:51:05 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> Here's how I fixed it, or rather, how I worked around it.
> ...
For those of you who are interested, I wrote up what I learned about serial
terminals and
serial consoles and put it in my lilo web page at
http://users.wowway.
On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:46:45 -0400 (EDT), Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> I would try dumping a man page to a file and then examining the file
> to understand if the 'm's are in the man output or an artifact of
> browsing on the terminal with less.
Here's what I did. On a terminal other than my 3151, I is
Stephen Powell wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Stephen Powell wrote:
> >> ...
> >> But when I issue the MAN command, I see lower-case "m"s
> >> at the end of each line.
D'oh! I apologize for not having read this correctly. I had
completely misse
On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 11:59:49 -0400 (EDT), Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> Times change. If one waits even a short while, they can change a lot.
> When this terminal was new, a 'standard' terminal was a mechanical
> teletype manufactured by Teletype Corp. in Skokie, IL. The generic
> name for this 'ter
On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 04:01:10 -0400 (EDT), Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> ...
>> But when I issue the MAN command, I see lower-case "m"s
>> at the end of each line.
>
> How does the terminal handle control-m carriage returns? Normally at
On 20150405_0201-0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
> > I am experiencing a very strange phenomenon. I have an old IBM 3151
> > ASCII display terminal that has been lying around the house;
> > and today I decided to see if I could get it connected up to one
>
> Fun! I never used one
CII,
> though it does support vt100 graphic character escape sequences for
> box drawing. I have modified ~/.bashrc so that if the terminal type
> ($TERM) is ibm3151, I set LANG to en_US, and that has solved some
> problems. But when I issue the MAN command, I see lower-case "m&
type
($TERM) is ibm3151, I set LANG to en_US, and that has solved some
problems. But when I issue the MAN command, I see lower-case "m"s
at the end of each line.
I tried searching the internet with the keywords
trailing m at the end of each line with man
but it produced no useful resul
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 04:15:48AM -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> dpkg-buildpackage definitely doesn't have (at least, I don't see it in the
> manpage) anything as simple and straightforward as sbuild's "--binNMU"
> option. But I'd be interested in hearing recipes for doing this with
> dpkg-buildpac
On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:08:32 +0200
Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-07-07 20:51 +0200, Brian Sammon wrote:
>
> > So I would have to install/learn "sbuild".
>
> If you just want to rebuild packages locally, this is not really
> necessary.
Are you saying there's another way to do what I want to do?
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:39:06 +0100
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:51:40PM -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> > So I would have to install/learn "sbuild".
>
> sbuild can be used to do it, but you don't need sbuild. I think
> dpkg-buildpackage would be sufficient,
dpkg-buildpackag
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:51:40PM -0400, Brian Sammon wrote:
> So I would have to install/learn "sbuild".
sbuild can be used to do it, but you don't need sbuild. I think
dpkg-buildpackage would be sufficient, but you'd ideally do it in a chroot of
some sort, which sbuild manages. Another tool to
On 2014-07-07 20:51 +0200, Brian Sammon wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:55:22 +0100
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
>> Packages in the archive with a "+bN" version suffix, such as "+b1", have be
>> 'binNMUd': essentially rebuilt without any source changes because the
>> environment has changed (such a
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:55:22 +0100
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Packages in the archive with a "+bN" version suffix, such as "+b1", have be
> 'binNMUd': essentially rebuilt without any source changes because the
> environment has changed (such as a version bump of a library dependency).
Ah! Thank y
Packages in the archive with a "+bN" version suffix, such as "+b1", have been
'binNMUd': essentially rebuilt without any source changes because the
environment has changed (such as a version bump of a library dependency).
In your case it would be worthwhile documenting the fact your package differ
choice is to build a binary package with a suffix like
> "+b1" or "+local" on the end.
If you make no changes to the source, nor the debian control files,
shouldn't you end up with the same package?
Or perhaps, you want to backport a package? Or compile for some
esote
I want to re-build a package for personal use, and have a special version
number for my custom build.
Since I'm not planning on customizing the source or the debian control files, I
think the ideal choice is to build a binary package with a suffix like "+b1" or
"+local"
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Regid Ichira wrote:
> Isn't closing fd at the end makes all the work meaningless?
>
> $ man login_tty| grep -A6 'The login_tty() '
> The login_tty() function prepares for a login on the tty fd
> (which ma
Isn't closing fd at the end makes all the work meaningless?
$ man login_tty| grep -A6 'The login_tty() '
The login_tty() function prepares for a login on the tty fd
(which may be a real tty device, or the slave of a pseudoter-
minal a
> I run depmod -a, it generates a new modules.dep file but still with
> incomplete line at the end. The content of the incomplete line keeps
> changing.
> From the content of the file, I can tell only a small portion of
> modules are loaded.
I was just about to ask, is your d
can not be loaded.
"modprobe e100" gives me "can't locate modules" although e100 is located in
the /lib/modules/*.
I checked the modules.dep, I surprisingly found there is a incomplete line
at the end of file. Like
*** ---those are the correct lines
e1
2006/10/7, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 06 October 2006 00:32, Jason Spiro wrote:
> > This can be done with mod_speling or with something like
> >
> > RewriteRule ^(.*)[,.]$ $1 [R]
> >
> > though the latter will prevent you from requesting any file
> > ending with period or
On Friday 06 October 2006 00:32, Jason Spiro wrote:
> > This can be done with mod_speling or with something like
> >
> > RewriteRule ^(.*)[,.]$ $1 [R]
> >
> > though the latter will prevent you from requesting any file
> > ending with period or comma. With some more refined rewrite magic
> > using
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 06:32:59PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
>
> Why shouldn't Apache ship with a RewriteRule to correct such a common
> error by default? It's very uncommon for webmasters to post files
> whose names end with a period or comma anyway.
>
Perhaps this is not such a good idea. The
http://www.jspiro.com/wiki
>
> This causes a lot of 404 errors on web servers everywhere. Would it
> be possible for apache to automatically detect extra periods/commas
> at the end of URLs and redirect clients to the correct place?
This can be done with mod_speling or with something l
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:58:23PM -0500, Joseph H. Fry wrote:
On Friday 27 January 2006 7:05 am, Jerry and/or Susan Atlansky wrote:
THE END OF THE IRAQ WAR
UNITED STATES PETITION
JANUARY 25, 2006
We The People, majority of peaceful Americans of these great 50 United
States & Territories
On Friday 27 January 2006 7:05 am, Jerry and/or Susan Atlansky wrote:
> THE END OF THE IRAQ WAR
>
> UNITED STATES PETITION
>
> JANUARY 25, 2006
>
> We The People, majority of peaceful Americans of these great 50 United
> States & Territories, do hearby state that since
I don't this this list is the place to send such messages.
You make me NOT want to support you by spamming you message.
> THE END OF THE IRAQ WAR
>
> UNITED STATES PETITION
>
> JANUARY 25, 2006
>
> We The People, majority of peaceful Americans of these great 50 United
Steve Block wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:05:18AM -0800, Jerry and/or Susan Atlansky
> wrote:
>
>> THE END OF THE IRAQ WAR
>>
>> UNITED STATES PETITION
>>
>> JANUARY 25, 2006
>>
>> We The People, majority of peaceful Americans of these
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Steve Block wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:05:18AM -0800, Jerry and/or Susan Atlansky wrote:
> >THE END OF THE IRAQ WAR
> >
> >UNITED STATES PETITION
>
> No one gets my support by spamming.
Spam? On this list?! Surely you jest!
-Dennis Carr
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:05:18AM -0800, Jerry and/or Susan Atlansky wrote:
THE END OF THE IRAQ WAR
UNITED STATES PETITION
JANUARY 25, 2006
We The People, majority of peaceful Americans of these great 50 United
States & Territories, do hearby state that since we declared war on Iraq
THE END OF THE IRAQ WAR
UNITED STATES PETITION
JANUARY 25, 2006
We The People, majority of peaceful Americans of these great 50 United
States & Territories, do hearby state that since we declared war on Iraq
in 2003 without being in any imminent threat against our country, we
http://suffinte.com/view.cgi?s=ret&m=gfibjW-PRfS.YbRQR,gfibjW,VSd
Naughty teen Dasha proved that she could handle a big, fat black johnny in her
tight virgin whisker!
Dasha got her freak on! =))
She grabbed that black cock with her fist and started sucking like there was no
tomorrow!
We Fr
READ THIS E-MAIL TO THE END ! -TRUE STORY AS SEEN ON ABC 20-20b.htm
Description: Binary data
> > > Basically, what I am doing (once in a while), to get
> > > > a recent rfc-index file, and merging each rfc description
> > > > (1-3 lines) into one line. The script is actually simple
> > > > and stupid.
> >
> > The original file is a d
Satyam)
Subject Re: AWK: adds "^M" at
(1-3 lines) into one line. The script is actually simple
> > > and stupid.
>
> The original file is a dos format text file. Dos text files have CR-LF
> at the end of every line, whereas unix files only have LF. The extra CR
> is the ^M you're seeing. Obviously awk (mawk?)
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Matthew Dalton wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 05:10:15AM -0400, Abdul Latip wrote:
>>> It is ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc-index.txt
>>> I believe that that file does not have ^Ms.
>>> Basically, what I am doing (once in a while), to get
>>> a recent rfc-index file, and me
(1-3 lines) into one line. The script is actually simple
> > > and stupid.
>
> The original file is a dos format text file. Dos text files have CR-LF
> at the end of every line, whereas unix files only have LF. The extra CR
> is the ^M you're seeing. Obviously awk (mawk?)
I believe that that file does not have ^Ms.
> > Basically, what I am doing (once in a while), to get
> > a recent rfc-index file, and merging each rfc description
> > (1-3 lines) into one line. The script is actually simple
> > and stupid.
The original file is a dos forma
o work a
> > > couple of months ago (on potato), but not anymore (on woody).
> > > I have no idea why, since I seldom use it. I tried both
> > > mawk and gawk.
> > >
> > > Apparently, $0 includes a "^M" character at the end.
> > >
$0 includes a "^M" character at the end.
> Thus, for an empty line: /^$/ has to be changed to /^.$/ .
> Is there any wrong environment on my system?
>
> Any clue?
What file are you trying to read. If it is mail coming from fetchmail,
there were some change which caus
I am having problems with my AWK script. It used to work a
couple of months ago (on potato), but not anymore (on woody).
I have no idea why, since I seldom use it. I tried both
mawk and gawk.
Apparently, $0 includes a "^M" character at the end.
Thus, for an empty line: /^$/ has to be
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 13:20:09 +0930, Tom Cook wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have quickly googled this problem and can't find anything, so...
>
>I am using CUPS to print to a netware printer. Everything works
>beautifully except that at the end of each job a blank page is
>printed, wh
> On 22 Apr 2002, Tom Cook wrote:
>
> I have quickly googled this problem and can't find anything, so...
>
> I am using CUPS to print to a netware printer. Everything works
> beautifully except that at the end of each job a blank page is
> printed, which I just stuf
gt;
> I am using CUPS to print to a netware printer. Everything works
> beautifully except that at the end of each job a blank page is
> printed, which I just stuff back into the paper tray.
>
> I don't have a non-netware printer handy that I can compare with. The
> netware pr
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
