On 10 Jun 2005, Ralph Katz wrote:
> On 06/10/2005 04:20 AM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> > messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> > sending out bogus messages. I normally get a few of these and mark t
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 04:25:22PM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
> I didn't follow this entire discussion from the beginning, so maybe it's been
> said already, but if all these spoofed address messages result in you
> receiving a bunch of "undeliverable" returns, why not filter on the word
> "und
Robert writes:
> I didn't follow this entire discussion from the beginning, so maybe it's
> been said already, but if all these spoofed address messages result in
> you receiving a bunch of "undeliverable" returns, why not filter on the
> word "undeliverable" in the Subject line?
That will get the
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> sending out bogus messages. I normally get a few of these and mark them
> as spam, but this
On Saturday 11 June 2005 05:27, Thomas Stivers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:19:12 PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> > > I would like to always sign my emails, but I always worry that people
> > > will dislike the extra over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sanchez said:
> Pretty much. And since most now do S/MIME and PGP/MIME instead of the
> old ASCII inline, if they don't it shows up as some random attachment,
> instead of a bunch of crap at the top and bottom of a message.
The thing with
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:03:52PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:57:48PM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:19:19AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > > > Since
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:02:46PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> On Friday 10 Jun 2005 21:57, David Jardine wrote:
> > I had this problem a week or two ago (I think I reported it in
> > panic on this list). It went away as suddenly as it appeared, but
> > I'd be interested to know how GPG solves the
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:27:26PM -0500, Thomas Stivers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:19:12 PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> > > I would like to always sign my emails, but I always worry that people
> > > will
> > > disl
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:19:12 PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> > I would like to always sign my emails, but I always worry that people will
> > dislike the extra overhead, and maybe find it hard to read. Do most
> > clients
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:03, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > 3. Tell people that you *always* GPG sign your messages or encrypt to
> > them and that if they receive a message "from" your email address that
> > is neither signed nor encryp
On Friday 10 Jun 2005 22:03, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> 3. Tell people that you *always* GPG sign your messages or encrypt to
> them and that if they receive a message "from" your email address that
> is neither signed nor encrypted, they can safely discard it without even
> looking.
>
> It is by
On Friday 10 Jun 2005 21:57, David Jardine wrote:
> I had this problem a week or two ago (I think I reported it in
> panic on this list). It went away as suddenly as it appeared, but
> I'd be interested to know how GPG solves the problem - and what the
> best source of documentation is for GPG.
G
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:57:48PM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:19:19AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> > > > messages
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:19:19AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> > > messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> > > sending
On 06/10/2005 04:20 AM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> sending out bogus messages. I normally get a few of these and mark them
> as spam, but this is ridiculous. Is
On 10 Jun 2005, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> > messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> > sending out bogus messages.
>
> This is referred
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:44:23PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> > messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> > sending out bogus messag
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> sending out bogus messages.
This is referred to as a "joe job" (google for more info). In
On 10 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2005 03:16 am, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> > messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> > sending out bogus messages. I normally get a few of
Anthony Campbell:
>
> Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> sending out bogus messages. I normally get a few of these and mark them
> as spam, but this is ridiculous. Is there any way to stop it hap
On Friday 10 June 2005 03:16 am, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
> messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
> sending out bogus messages. I normally get a few of these and mark them
> as spam, but this is ridicu
Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
sending out bogus messages. I normally get a few of these and mark them
as spam, but this is ridiculous. Is there any way to stop it happening?
Anthony
--
[EMAIL
23 matches
Mail list logo
