On Saturday 11 June 2005 05:27, Thomas Stivers wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:19:12 PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:05:04PM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote: > > > I would like to always sign my emails, but I always worry that people > > > will dislike the extra overhead, and maybe find it hard to read. Do > > > most clients display GPG signatures nicely now? > > > > Pretty much. And since most now do S/MIME and PGP/MIME instead of the > > old ASCII inline, if they don't it shows up as some random attachment, > > instead of a bunch of crap at the top and bottom of a message. > > The problem is that you can't use it universally because there are still > way too many people using M$ products which simply don't display any > body for messages that are pgp/mime signed. Unfortunately these people > tend to be bosses, elderly family members, Etc. so you have to make an > effort to exclude them from receiving pgp/mime signed messages. Still > it's nice to have the if it ain't signed it ain't mine explanation.
I didn't follow this entire discussion from the beginning, so maybe it's been said already, but if all these spoofed address messages result in you receiving a bunch of "undeliverable" returns, why not filter on the word "undeliverable" in the Subject line? You could do that easily with Mailfilter, SpamAssassin, even Kmail's filter feature. cheers, Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
