Hello,
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:49:32PM +0200, Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> The only thing that's always annoying is that too many programs
> believe they have to overwrite /etc/resolv.conf...
chattr +i # immutable
still works :)
On 2024-07-06, George at Clug wrote:
>> What I really need is a good book
>> or document that explains the design
>> and implementation of networking with systemd and Network Manager on
>> modern Debian GNU/Linux systems. Recommendations?
>
> Sadly I have not found any documentation (or books) f
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 21:51:09 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> What I really need is a good book or document that explains the design and
> implementation of networking with systemd and Network Manager on modern
> Debian GNU/Linux systems. Recommendations?
The main thing to understand is that
On 7/6/24 06:51, David Christensen wrote:
The underlying issue appears to be that my old-school Linux console
network administration skills have been rendered obsolete by systemd and
NetworkManager.
I don't think that these skills are obsolete.
I still use /etc/network/interfaces for everythi
On 7/6/24 06:37, jeremy ardley wrote:
As I said in my earlier post, it's not necessary to disable dhcpd and in
fact it is likely undesirable.
Note that the warning in the wiki talks about dhcpcd, not about dhcpd.
Though as a pointed out before, your machine very likely will have
NetworkManag
erface with DHCP
and a development LAN with a static IP address.
So disabling DHCP may cause additional problems and will solve none.
Detlef
On Saturday, 06-07-2024 at 14:51 David Christensen wrote:
> On 7/5/24 19:06, Max Nikulin wrote:
>
>
> On 7/5/24 21:14, George at Clug wrote:
>
>
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
>
> The underlying issue appears to be that my old-school Linux console
> network administration skills have bee
On 6/7/24 12:51, David Christensen wrote:
What I really need is a good book or document that explains the design
and implementation of networking with systemd and Network Manager on
modern Debian GNU/Linux systems. Recommendations?
If you want to persist with the NetworkManager approach,
On 7/5/24 19:06, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 7/5/24 21:14, George at Clug wrote:
Thank you for your replies.
The underlying issue appears to be that my old-school Linux console
network administration skills have been rendered obsolete by systemd and
NetworkManager. I typically install Xfce whe
On 6/7/24 09:16, David Christensen wrote:
I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding
disabling DHCP when using a static IP:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-handbook/sect.network-config.en.html#sect.interface-ethernet
As I said in my earlier post, it
David,
How are your efforts toward setting a static IP address going? Have you
succeeded.
I set up a lot of test servers (for fun and no profit), and hence work with
Hypervisors (KVM more than Virtual Box), and have some experience in this area.
But at this point I am not sure if you need
On 06/07/2024 08:16, David Christensen wrote:
I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding
disabling DHCP when using a static IP:
[...]
https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration?action=info
The following sentence:
"Make sure to disable all DHCP services, e.g. dh
On 7/4/24 21:08, Felix Miata wrote:
On 7/4/24 21:10, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 7/5/24 11:44, Franco Martelli wrote:
Thank you all for the replies.
I can find no statement in The Debian Administrator's Handbook regarding
disabling DHCP when using a static IP:
https://www.debian.org/doc/ma
On 05/07/24 at 04:06, David Christensen wrote:
The VM currently has a DHCP address. I would like to set a static IPv4
address. The Debian wiki tells me to edit /etc/network/interfaces and
provides some example settings that I believe I can adapt to my use-case:
...
What is the correct meth
On 5/7/24 13:13, jeremy ardley wrote:
On 5/7/24 10:30, Felix Miata wrote:
I think there are more than one. One thing is to check what is
enabled, then
disable or uninstall whatever owns the unit(s):
systemctl list-unit-files | egrep 'net|dhcp'
Do the same with whatever "manages" /etc
On 5/7/24 10:30, Felix Miata wrote:
I think there are more than one. One thing is to check what is enabled, then
disable or uninstall whatever owns the unit(s):
systemctl list-unit-files | egrep 'net|dhcp'
Do the same with whatever "manages" /etc/resolv.conf, and create a regular fil
On 5/7/24 10:06, David Christensen wrote:
The Debian wiki also says:
"Make sure to disable all DHCP services, e.g. dhcpcd."
What is the correct method to "disable all DHCP services"?
The instruction is not necessary.
It doesn't matter if there is a dhcp server anywhere if the client -
ur own design.
>> I don't use VMs, but I did several hours ago instruct several hours ago using
>> systemd-network to setup static IP service for a *buntu user who couldn't get
>> netplan sorted:
>> <https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/netplan-ap
n't get
netplan sorted:
<https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/netplan-apply-no-longer-setting-static-ip-address-4175738702/#post6512274>
I've been using systemd-network static IPs on everything for several years,
including Bullseye.
2024-07-04 20:15:43 root@laalaa ~
etup static IP service for a *buntu user who couldn't get
netplan sorted:
<https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/netplan-apply-no-longer-setting-static-ip-address-4175738702/#post6512274>
I've been using systemd-network static IPs on everything for several years,
incl
debian-user:
I have built a VirtualBox virtual machine and installed Debian 11 with
SSH server and standard system utilities only. I plan to use the VM to
run the UniFi Network Controller to manage the UniFi equipment on my
SOHO LAN:
root@unifi:~# cat /etc/debian_version ; uname -a
11.10
Li
OK and thanks. I will do that
On 03/02/2018 05:16 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2018-03-02, Thomas George wrote:
I think this should work. For the present I have moved on to other
tasks. The printer has a usb connection to the pc so I can print as
needed. Others on the lan cannot use the printer.
You
On 2018-03-02, Thomas George wrote:
> I think this should work. For the present I have moved on to other
> tasks. The printer has a usb connection to the pc so I can print as
> needed. Others on the lan cannot use the printer.
>
>
You could share the usb-connected printer via cups:
https://wik
On 3/2/2018 2:03 AM, Thomas George wrote:
I think this should work. For the present I have moved on to other
tasks. The printer has a usb connection to the pc so I can print as
needed. Others on the lan cannot use the printer.
you can share the printer using cups.
The other on the LAN would
I think this should work. For the present I have moved on to other
tasks. The printer has a usb connection to the pc so I can print as
needed. Others on the lan cannot use the printer.
On 03/01/2018 05:08 AM, Bernd Gruber wrote:
Can't you just plug the printer locally to a PC, change manually
Can't you just plug the printer locally to a PC, change manually the PC's
network-address to 192.168.1.x, connect to the printer and change its IP to
192.168.2.x. Then, of course, you will loose the connection, but the printer
will be in the desired network. Don't forget to change IP-configurati
On 02/28/2018 07:34 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
Curt wrote:
On 2018-02-28, Dan Purgert wrote:
Thomas George wrote:
The printer has no physical control panel. I can only change the
settings if I can reach it through its IP address.
Many printers will print a "self-test" or "configuration" page w
Curt wrote:
> On 2018-02-28, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Thomas George wrote:
>>> The printer has no physical control panel. I can only change the
>>> settings if I can reach it through its IP address.
>>
>> Many printers will print a "self-test" or "configuration" page when
>> holding the "online" but
On 2018-02-28, Dan Purgert wrote:
> Thomas George wrote:
>> The printer has no physical control panel. I can only change the
>> settings if I can reach it through its IP address.
>
> Many printers will print a "self-test" or "configuration" page when
> holding the "online" button for 5-10 seconds
On 2/28/2018 1:37 AM, Thomas George wrote:
On 02/27/2018 01:24 PM, john doe wrote:
On 2/27/2018 7:07 PM, Thomas George wrote:
The Samsung CLP-320 printer's static ip 192.168.1.139 was set about
10 years ago to work on a lan using 192.168.1.x addresses. Last week
the lan's router failed and w
Thomas George wrote:
> The printer has no physical control panel. I can only change the
> settings if I can reach it through its IP address.
Many printers will print a "self-test" or "configuration" page when
holding the "online" button for 5-10 seconds.
--
|_|O|_| Registered Linux user #5859
On 02/27/2018 08:04 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2018 16:21:59 Thomas George wrote:
I tried dnsmasq --dhcp-host=00:15:99:86:11:1F,CLP,192.168.2.13
and the response was "failed to create listening socket for port 53:
Address already in use." Tried several other final two dig
On Tuesday 27 February 2018 20:04:34 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2018 16:21:59 Thomas George wrote:
> > I tried dnsmasq --dhcp-host=00:15:99:86:11:1F,CLP,192.168.2.13
> >
> > and the response was "failed to create listening socket for port 53:
> > Address already in use." Tried se
On Tuesday 27 February 2018 16:21:59 Thomas George wrote:
> I tried dnsmasq --dhcp-host=00:15:99:86:11:1F,CLP,192.168.2.13
>
> and the response was "failed to create listening socket for port 53:
> Address already in use." Tried several other final two digits with the
> same result. I even tried 1
On 02/27/2018 01:24 PM, john doe wrote:
On 2/27/2018 7:07 PM, Thomas George wrote:
The Samsung CLP-320 printer's static ip 192.168.1.139 was set about
10 years ago to work on a lan using 192.168.1.x addresses. Last week
the lan's router failed and was replaced with a Netgear r6700 router
usi
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:21:59PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> I tried dnsmasq --dhcp-host=00:15:99:86:11:1F,CLP,192.168.2.13
>
> and the response was "failed to create listening socket for port 53: Address
> already in use."
That means you've already got something else listening on the DNS por
On 02/27/2018 04:21 PM, Thomas George wrote:
I tried dnsmasq --dhcp-host=00:15:99:86:11:1F,CLP,192.168.2.13
and the response was "failed to create listening socket for port 53:
Address already in use." Tried several other final two digits with the
same result. I even tried 192.168.1.139, the
I tried dnsmasq --dhcp-host=00:15:99:86:11:1F,CLP,192.168.2.13
and the response was "failed to create listening socket for port 53:
Address already in use." Tried several other final two digits with the
same result. I even tried 192.168.1.139, the address the printer prints
out on its Network
I don't think you can talk to a 192.168.1.xxx ip address from a machine that
thinks
it's on a 192.168.2/24 network - you machine will just try to route the
traffic through your router.
I might try to change the netmask on the router to 255.255.0.0 which
would put the 192.168.1.xxx into your local
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:07:17PM -0500, Thomas George wrote:
> apt-cache search dhcpd finds udhcpd. My pc's system is Debian Stretch. There
> is a file /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf but no file /etc/dhcpd.
There's something wrong with your repository selection.
What you probably need is c
On 2/27/2018 7:07 PM, Thomas George wrote:
The Samsung CLP-320 printer's static ip 192.168.1.139 was set about 10
years ago to work on a lan using 192.168.1.x addresses. Last week the
lan's router failed and was replaced with a Netgear r6700 router using
192.168.2.x addresses. The printer is no
The Samsung CLP-320 printer's static ip 192.168.1.139 was set about 10
years ago to work on a lan using 192.168.1.x addresses. Last week the
lan's router failed and was replaced with a Netgear r6700 router using
192.168.2.x addresses. The printer is now inaccessible from the lan.
Cups Administ
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 05:24:45AM -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> To avoid booting delay while DHCP tries to get an IP address, I decided
> to use a static address for the wlan0 interface.
>
> I tried this:
>
> auto wlan0
> iface wlan0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.124
> gateway 192.168.1.1
>
other machines and disks.
The wicd Preferences I also set up for static IP address. However, the
check box before the Key field is not checked, for apparently it wasn't
necessary.
Haines Brown
Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:35:09 +0100
> Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 14:45:32 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:09:08 +0100
> > > Brian wrote:
> > > > On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 10:01:59 +, Curt wrote:
> > > > > On 2015-08-28, David Wrig
Quoting Brian (a...@cityscape.co.uk):
> On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 14:45:32 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:09:08 +0100
> > Brian wrote:
> > > On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 10:01:59 +, Curt wrote:
> > > > On 2015-08-28, David Wright wrote:
> > > > > $ host localhost
> > > > > Host localhost
On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 16:13:34 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-08-28, Brian wrote:
> >
> > I think I'll leave this topic at this point before I get in over my
> > head, but the implication here is that a resolver not giving 127.0.0.1
> > for localhost is broken in some way.
> >
>
> So I'm not broke
On 2015-08-28, Brian wrote:
>
> I think I'll leave this topic at this point before I get in over my
> head, but the implication here is that a resolver not giving 127.0.0.1
> for localhost is broken in some way.
>
So I'm not broken somehow.
On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 17:00:59 +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:35:09 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> > On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 14:45:32 +0300, Reco wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:09:08 +0100
> > > Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 10:01:5
Hi.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:35:09 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 14:45:32 +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:09:08 +0100
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 10:01:59 +, Curt wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2015-08-28, David Wright wrote:
> > >
On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 14:45:32 +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:09:08 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
> > On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 10:01:59 +, Curt wrote:
> >
> > > On 2015-08-28, David Wright wrote:
> > > >
> > > > $ host localhost
> > > > Host localhost not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
>
Hi.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:09:08 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 10:01:59 +, Curt wrote:
>
> > On 2015-08-28, David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > $ host localhost
> > > Host localhost not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> > > $ ping localhost
> > > PING localhost (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of dat
On Fri 28 Aug 2015 at 10:01:59 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2015-08-28, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > $ host localhost
> > Host localhost not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> > $ ping localhost
> > PING localhost (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.032
On 2015-08-28, David Wright wrote:
>
> $ host localhost
> Host localhost not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> $ ping localhost
> PING localhost (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.032 ms
curty@einstein:~$ host localhost
localhost has address 127.0
Quoting Elimar Riesebieter (riese...@lxtec.de):
> * David Wright [2015-08-27 13:29 -0500]:
>
> > Quoting Elimar Riesebieter (riese...@lxtec.de):
> > > * rlhar...@oplink.net [2015-08-27 02:09 -0500]:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > How can I determine the address without reinstalling?
> > >
* David Wright [2015-08-27 13:29 -0500]:
> Quoting Elimar Riesebieter (riese...@lxtec.de):
> > * rlhar...@oplink.net [2015-08-27 02:09 -0500]:
> >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > How can I determine the address without reinstalling?
> >
> > $ host $(hostname)
>
> $ host junk
> Host junk not found: 3(N
Quoting Hans (hans.ullr...@loop.de):
> Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015, 12:19:23 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:
> Hi,
> I understood the question of the op in that way, that he wants to give a new
> ip-address without installing new.
>
> The answer:
>
> You can edit /etc/network/interfaces , after this
Quoting Elimar Riesebieter (riese...@lxtec.de):
> * rlhar...@oplink.net [2015-08-27 02:09 -0500]:
>
> [...]
> >
> > How can I determine the address without reinstalling?
>
> $ host $(hostname)
$ host junk
Host junk not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
$
... whether junk is localhost, another PC on the LAN,
On Thursday 27 August 2015 06:02:13 Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:22:11 -0400
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Months ago I installed Jessie + xfce on a laptop and assigned a
> > > static ip address to eth0. Now I have forgotten the ip address
> &g
Have a look at
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html#_iproute2_commands
as well as the whole chapter 5 of the Debian manual.
The "modern" way to control the IP-address is
$ ip addr
--
Regards,
jvp.
Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015, 12:19:23 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:
Hi,
I understood the question of the op in that way, that he wants to give a new
ip-address without installing new.
The answer:
You can edit /etc/network/interfaces , after this
do /etc/init.d/networking restart.
If you are using
Hi,
rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> > The solution: ifconfig
Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
> Or, as root, run
Or as normal user:
/sbin/ifconfig
It's only a matter of shell PATH, not of permissions.
Now why does my eth0 have so many inet6
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:22:11 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Months ago I installed Jessie + xfce on a laptop and assigned a static
> > ip address to eth0. Now I have forgotten the ip address and need to
> > know it before I plug it into my local network.
> > The addr
* rlhar...@oplink.net [2015-08-27 02:09 -0500]:
[...]
>
> How can I determine the address without reinstalling?
$ host $(hostname)
Elimar
--
.~.
/V\ L I N U X
/( )\ >Phear the Penguin<
^^-^^
On Thursday 27 August 2015 03:09:32 rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> Months ago I installed Jessie + xfce on a laptop and assigned a static
> ip address to eth0. Now I have forgotten the ip address and need to
> know it before I plug it into my local network.
>
> The address is no
On Thu, August 27, 2015 2:09 am, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> Months ago I installed Jessie + xfce on a laptop and assigned a static ip
> address to eth0. Now I have forgotten the ip address and need to know
> it before I plug it into my local network.
>
> The address is not in
Months ago I installed Jessie + xfce on a laptop and assigned a static ip
address to eth0. Now I have forgotten the ip address and need to know it
before I plug it into my local network.
The address is not in /etc/hosts, and there is no Network Manager Applet
in the panel.
How can I determine
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Steve Kleene wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:32:42 -0500, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
>
>> (I also have dns-nameservers lines in my eth0 stanza in /e/n/i.
>> IIRC, when I didn't, using dynamic wireless connections kept clobbering
>> the static DNS entries in /etc/reso
16.8.2011 18:31, Steve Kleene kirjoitti:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:32:42 -0500, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
>> (I also have dns-nameservers lines in my eth0 stanza in /e/n/i.
>> IIRC, when I didn't, using dynamic wireless connections kept clobbering
>> the static DNS entries in /etc/resolv.conf.)
>
> T
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> (...)
>
> NM calls -by default- "dhclient", so... is NM running?
>
> If so, stop NM ("/etc/init.d/network-manager stop") or kill "dhclient"
> process and then restart the network service (also run ifdown/ifup, just to
> be sure). After that run
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:32:42 -0500, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
> FYI, you can use Network Manager and /etc/network/interfaces together w/o
> problems. ...
Thanks. I'll look into this when I have some time.
> (I also have dns-nameservers lines in my eth0 stanza in /e/n/i.
> IIRC, when I didn't, usi
Steve Kleene, 15.08.2011:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:14:56 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote:
>
> > NM calls -by default- "dhclient", so... is NM running?
>
> Yes, it is running on each of the two machines.
>
> > If so, stop NM ("/etc/init.d/network-manager stop") or kill "dhclient"
> > process and then
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:39:54 +, Steve Kleene wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:14:56 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote:
>
>> NM calls -by default- "dhclient", so... is NM running?
>
> Yes, it is running on each of the two machines.
"Arghh!!!" I mean... "ahh", that explains your pain :-P
>> If so,
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:14:56 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote:
> NM calls -by default- "dhclient", so... is NM running?
Yes, it is running on each of the two machines.
> If so, stop NM ("/etc/init.d/network-manager stop") or kill "dhclient"
> process and then restart the network service (also run ifd
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:01:17 +, Steve Kleene wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:49:24 +, I wrote:
>
>> I asked my organization to assign me a static IP address within their
>> network, and they obliged. The problem is that every time I boot now,
>> I still get the o
On Monday 15 August 2011 17:01:17 Steve Kleene wrote:
> > I also wondered whether you were trying to run both your boxen with the
> > same IP, since you say that the other one works.
>
> That is not the problem. I have two distinct static IPs, one for each box.
That seemed massively more likely,
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:49:24 +, I wrote:
> I asked my organization to assign me a static IP address within their
> network, and they obliged. The problem is that every time I boot now, I
> still get the old address in DHCP space that I had before.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:26:32 +
On Monday 15 August 2011 16:05:43 gnubayonne-debian...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >All I did at my end to set this up was to change /etc/network/interfaces
> > to
> >
> >the following:
> >
> >auto lo
> >iface lo inet loopback
> >
> ># The primary network interface
> >allow-hotplug eth0
> >iface eth0 inet s
>All I did at my end to set this up was to change /etc/network/interfaces to
>the following:
>auto lo
>iface lo inet loopback
># The primary network interface
>allow-hotplug eth0
>iface eth0 inet static
>address 10.97.14.253
>netmask 255.255.255.0
>gateway 10.97.14.1
>auto eth0
Have u tried p
On Mon 15 Aug 2011 at 11:49:24 +, Steve Kleene wrote:
> I asked my organization to assign me a static IP address within their
> network, and they obliged. The problem is that every time I boot now, I
> still get the old address in DHCP space that I had before. To make the
&g
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:10:15 +, Steve Kleene wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:52:48 + (UTC), Camaleón replied:
>
>> If adminds are requesting you the MAC address you may be still need to
>> setup a dynamic configuration for your adapter (DHCP). So I would first
>> ask them what kind of set
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:49:24 +, I wrote:
> I asked my organization to assign me a static IP address within their
> network, and they obliged. The problem is that every time I boot now, I
> still get the old address in DHCP space that I had before.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:19:24 +053
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:49:24 +, Steve Kleene wrote:
> I asked my organization to assign me a static IP address within their
> network, and they obliged. The problem is that every time I boot now, I
> still get the old address in DHCP space that I had before. To make the
> change
On 08/15/2011 05:19 PM, Steve Kleene wrote:
I asked my organization to assign me a static IP address within their
network, and they obliged. The problem is that every time I boot now, I
still get the old address in DHCP space that I had before. To make the
change, I provided network operations
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:49:24 +, I wrote:
> I asked my organization to assign me a static IP address within their
> network, and they obliged. The problem is that every time I boot now, I
> still get the old address in DHCP space that I had before.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:58:06 GM
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:49:24 + (UTC), Steve Kleene writes:
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> # The primary network interface
> allow-hotplug eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 10.97.14.253
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> gateway 10.97.14.1
>
> auto eth0
>
> Connectivity is
I asked my organization to assign me a static IP address within their
network, and they obliged. The problem is that every time I boot now, I
still get the old address in DHCP space that I had before. To make the
change, I provided network operations with my MAC address, which I got from
the
2009/9/5 Jesús M. Navarro :
> On Friday 04 September 2009 14:21:25 John O Laoi wrote:
>>> Verify that no dhcp process is running in the background. If there is
>>> none remove the network manager.
>> Indeed there was DHCP processes running:
>> # ps aux | grep dhc
>> root 3650 0.0 0.0
Hi, John:
On Friday 04 September 2009 14:21:25 John O Laoi wrote:
> > Verify that no dhcp process is running in the background. If there is
> > none remove the network manager.
>
> Thanks Frank.
> Indeed there was DHCP processes running:
>
> # ps aux | grep dhc
> root 3650 0.0 0.0 0
> Verify that no dhcp process is running in the background. If there is none
> remove the network manager.
>
Thanks Frank.
Indeed there was DHCP processes running:
# ps aux | grep dhc
root 3650 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?Z08:31 0:00
[dhclient]
root 4044 0.0 0.0 2204 6
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 11:51 +0100, John O Laoi wrote:
> Some daemon is resetting the NIC address to null.
Verify that no dhcp process is running in the background. If there is
none remove the network manager.
Cheers
frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hello,
A question for networking gurus:
My ip address keeps on being set to null at my workplace.
I use my laptop at home and work.
At home, I use DHCP to get an ip address from my ISP. No problems.
At work, when I use
#dhclient eth0
it looks for DHCP leases but finds none.
So, I have a little s
Sorry… I'm a couple of days behind on the list, but it doesn't look
like this was ever solved for the OP.
On 2008-Aug-10, at 7:32 PM, Vwaju wrote:
I have an RCN cable modem (probably proprietary and not DOCSIS
compliant) which connects to a Dell TrueMobile 2300 Wireless Broadband
Router. The
t these settings are in the OP's
/etc/network/interfaces at all. I would expect to find them in the
router (or modem/router) and /etc/network/interfaces to contain only
private addresses (192.168 etc). Assuming the router is doing NAT.
[snip]
> > I should also mention that although
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
s. keeling wrote:
> Vwaju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Given that this server is just a lab project (with no critical data),
>> what's the worst that could happen?
>
> Perhaps some smart Russian/Chinese/... finds it and turns it into a
> bot master, or s
pens to the packets
>
> At your suggestion, I have downloaded and installed tcpdump, but I
> think it's going to take me some study (well worth it, I'm sure) to
> learn how to use it.
tcpdump will let you look at the packets that your network card sees, in
the example above
Vwaju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Given that this server is just a lab project (with no critical data),
> what's the worst that could happen?
Perhaps some smart Russian/Chinese/... finds it and turns it into a
bot master, or starts attacking DoD systems with it, or turns it into
a clandestine p2p
On Sun,10.Aug.08, 16:32:41, Vwaju wrote:
> > How is your computer *physically* connected to the internet?
>
> I have an RCN cable modem (probably proprietary and not DOCSIS
> compliant) which connects to a Dell TrueMobile 2300 Wireless Broadband
> Router.
> The wireless router broadcasts to a Del
> > production server, only a *training* server.
> > >
> > > More to the point: Although sarge is no longer state-of-the-art, I
> > > assume it should still be possible to configure it as an internet
> > > server with a static IP address!
> >
> >
gt; > etc.
>
> > I am building an internet server, so I need to reconfigure networking
> > to use a static IP address. I edited /etc/network/interfaces, using
> > the static IP address leased to me by my RCN (and the other network
> > parameters RCN provided).
>
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
