On Friday 06 August 2010 11:31:53 Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On 8/6/2010 2:30 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
> > FYI, from debian-announce.
>
> A little behind times eh? Already a thread about it :P
Ack!
--
Greg Madden
Precision Air Balance, Inc.
Phone: (907)276-0461
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On 8/6/2010 3:27 PM, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 06/08/10 15:27, Brent Clark wrote:
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-annou.../msg9.html
>>
>> Flippen AWESOME.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone. Now the real work begins.
>>
>> Brent
>>
>>
> I was really hoping php 5.3.3 would make it into squeeze. It wil
On 06/08/10 15:27, Brent Clark wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-annou.../msg9.html
Flippen AWESOME.
Thanks to everyone. Now the real work begins.
Brent
I was really hoping php 5.3.3 would make it into squeeze. It will be
the first version of php that properly supports sqlite3. It
On 8/6/2010 2:30 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
> FYI, from debian-announce.
A little behind times eh? Already a thread about it :P
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debi
FYI, from debian-announce.
--
Peace,
Greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201008061130.26914.gomadtr...@gci.net
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:27:31PM +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-annou.../msg9.html
>
> Flippen AWESOME.
Now to get kfreebsd into shape with gnu. To me, that's what is making
this release stellar.
--
. O . O . O . . O O . . . O .
. . O . O O O . O
http://lists.debian.org/debian-annou.../msg9.html
Flippen AWESOME.
Thanks to everyone. Now the real work begins.
Brent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.deb
On Wed,03.Mar.10, 12:04:47, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:18:28 -0500 (EST), Freeman wrote:
> > With the same amount of resources (the same number of DDs), but less
> > time of course you have to cut somewhere. One possibility would be
> > reducing the amount of new features, as i
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:18:28 -0500 (EST), Freeman wrote:
> With the same amount of resources (the same number of DDs), but less
> time of course you have to cut somewhere. One possibility would be
> reducing the amount of new features, as in not package the absolutely
> latest version of software
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:28:57PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue,02.Mar.10, 11:15:19, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon,01.Mar.10, 17:46:11, Stephen Powell wrote:
> >
> > > Since the resources are fixed at $0 (donated free labor) and the time
> > > interval is fixed at one year, the release
On Tue,02.Mar.10, 11:15:19, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,01.Mar.10, 17:46:11, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> > Since the resources are fixed at $0 (donated free labor) and the time
> > interval is fixed at one year, the release goals go out the window.
> > You just can't eat your cake and have it too
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 09:15:19 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,01.Mar.10, 17:46:11, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > > There is no plan for timed release cycles, only timed freezes.
> >
> > Hmm. Well, I suppose that timed freezes is better than timed
> > release cycles, but it still breaks the traditio
Dne, 02. 03. 2010 10:15:19 je Andrei Popescu napisal(a):
Yes, it is free donated labor,
but it doesn't mean that it's worth $0!
Of *course* it doesn't (on the contrary, if I may add).
It simply means that you "can't increase the amount of donated labor at
will", since, in donated labor, pay
On Mon,01.Mar.10, 17:46:11, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > There is no plan for timed release cycles, only timed freezes.
>
> Hmm. Well, I suppose that timed freezes is better than timed
> release cycles, but it still breaks the traditional concept of
> "release goals", does it not? Historically, a
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:14:48 -0500 (EST), Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,01.Mar.10, 11:28:36, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Timed release cycles for Debian is a bad idea.
>> ...
>> Trying to go to timed release cycles
>> is either futile or fatal.
>
> There is no plan for timed release cycles, only tim
On Mon,01.Mar.10, 11:28:36, Stephen Powell wrote:
> release of any major distribution. Timed release cycles for Debian is a bad
> idea.
[snip]
> Trying to go to timed release cycles
> is either futile or fatal. Debian is not Ubuntu. Debian is Debian. Let
Debian is not Ubuntu.
> Debian is Debian. Let it retain its unique characteristics.
I couldn't agree more. Let those who like constant flux use e.g. Ubuntu. Or
one of many other distributions.
One of the many reasons that I like Debian, and possibly the most important,
is the longevity an
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:22:21 -0500 (EST), Freeman wrote:
> How "apt"ly named was squeeze, the release squeezed into only a year to
> adjust the package release cycle? And yet, I doubt that it was only I who
> doubted that plan. And, surely, many besides myself have felt this push in
> the form of
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:32:31PM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2010-02-22 20:22 (+0200), Brent Clark wrote:
>
> > Almost March.
> >
> > You know what they means. Cant wait for Squeeze to be frozen.
>
> Marc Brockschmidt from the Debian release team wrote that it's unlikely
> that they will fr
* 2010-02-22 20:22 (+0200), Brent Clark wrote:
> Almost March.
>
> You know what they means. Cant wait for Squeeze to be frozen.
Marc Brockschmidt from the Debian release team wrote that it's unlikely
that they will freeze in March. There are just too many release-critical
bugs.
http://lists.deb
Almost March.
You know what they means. Cant wait for Squeeze to be frozen.
Already run squeeze on my workstations. Just works.
Just excuse me.
Brent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
21 matches
Mail list logo
