On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:28:57PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Tue,02.Mar.10, 11:15:19, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > On Mon,01.Mar.10, 17:46:11, Stephen Powell wrote: > > > > > Since the resources are fixed at $0 (donated free labor) and the time > > > interval is fixed at one year, the release goals go out the window. > > > You just can't eat your cake and have it too. > > > > I don't think this is a fair comparison. Yes, it is free donated labor, > > but it doesn't mean that it's worth $0! > > Hmm, I think I misunderstood your original comment, let me retry: > > With the same amount of resources (the same number of DDs), but less > time of course you have to cut somewhere. One possibility would be > reducing the amount of new features, as in not package the absolutely > latest version of softwares, but focus on versions that are already > known to be stable. > > It seems though that the lenny -> squeeze migration will not be the > easiest as there are several major changes that you just can't avoid > (ex. KDE3 -> KDE4) and probably this is why the freeze date has been > postponed. >
According to Marc Brockschmidt, the desired target for a freeze is no more than 300 RC bugs. That leaves 577 to go, and counting up most recently. Maybe another year? -- Kind Regards, Freeman http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/8415/rcbugs.png -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100302211828.ga6...@europa.office
