On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 11:58:22 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Du, 29 ian 12, 09:37:36, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>> >
>> > Hmm, you must be running amd64, 3.1.0 is not available on i386. But
>> > anyway, if I understand correctly, it's too much effort to support
>> > more than one kernel version in bac
On Du, 29 ian 12, 09:37:36, Ramon Hofer wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, you must be running amd64, 3.1.0 is not available on i386. But
> > anyway, if I understand correctly, it's too much effort to support more
> > than one kernel version in backports, so it is likely to disappear soon.
> >
> > For nvidia-gl
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 01:28:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sb, 28 ian 12, 10:20:58, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>>
>> If I get you right I should install linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64?
>> But there are other packages too like linux-image-amd64 which installs
>> the extra package linux-image-3.1.0-0.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:16:04 +0100, didier gaumet wrote:
> Le Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:20:58 + (UTC), Ramon Hofer
> a écrit :
>
> [...]
>> I have added "deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-
>> backports main" to my /etc/apt/sources.list
>
> "deb http://backports.debian.org/d
On Sb, 28 ian 12, 10:20:58, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>
> If I get you right I should install linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64?
> But there are other packages too like linux-image-amd64 which installs
> the extra package linux-image-3.1.0-0.bpo.1-amd64. Here are all the
> possibilies I have:
Hmm, you m
Le Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:20:58 + (UTC),
Ramon Hofer a écrit :
[...]
> I have added "deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports
> squeeze- backports main" to my /etc/apt/sources.list
"deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze- backports
main non-free" would be better
[...]
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:00:49 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Vi, 27 ian 12, 20:39:06, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>>
>> The linux-image-amd64 package from squeeze backports installs linux-
>> image-3.1.0-0.bpo.1-amd64.
>> Is 2.6.29 the better choice than 3.1?
>
> I don't know, I can only tell you that
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:14:43 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Vi, 27 ian 12, 23:00:49, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>
>> I don't know, I can only tell you that 2.6.29 from squeeze-backports
>> doesn't work with nvidia-glx from squeeze, you need both from
>> backports, but in the meantime 2.6.29 got re
On Vi, 27 ian 12, 23:00:49, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> I don't know, I can only tell you that 2.6.29 from squeeze-backports
> doesn't work with nvidia-glx from squeeze, you need both from backports,
> but in the meantime 2.6.29 got replaced with 3.2 I didn't get the chance
> to test it (3.1 is n
On Vi, 27 ian 12, 20:39:06, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>
> The linux-image-amd64 package from squeeze backports installs linux-
> image-3.1.0-0.bpo.1-amd64.
> Is 2.6.29 the better choice than 3.1?
I don't know, I can only tell you that 2.6.29 from squeeze-backports
doesn't work with nvidia-glx from sque
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:50:25 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Vi, 27 ian 12, 15:21:47, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have some problems with the ir-remote of my htpc. That's why I want
>> to install a newer kernel.
>>
>> Can I install the linux-image-amd64 package from squeeze-backports
On Vi, 27 ian 12, 15:21:47, Ramon Hofer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have some problems with the ir-remote of my htpc.
> That's why I want to install a newer kernel.
>
> Can I install the linux-image-amd64 package from squeeze-backports kernel
> without changing nvidia-glx (version 195.36.31-6)?
>
> O
Hi all
I have some problems with the ir-remote of my htpc.
That's why I want to install a newer kernel.
Can I install the linux-image-amd64 package from squeeze-backports kernel
without changing nvidia-glx (version 195.36.31-6)?
Or will I have to compile the nvidia driver?
Best regards
Ramon
13 matches
Mail list logo
