On Vi, 27 ian 12, 20:39:06, Ramon Hofer wrote:
> 
> The linux-image-amd64 package from squeeze backports installs linux-
> image-3.1.0-0.bpo.1-amd64.
> Is 2.6.29 the better choice than 3.1?

I don't know, I can only tell you that 2.6.29 from squeeze-backports 
doesn't work with nvidia-glx from squeeze, you need both from backports, 
but in the meantime 2.6.29 got replaced with 3.2 I didn't get the chance 
to test it (3.1 is not in backports).
 
> I've never used backports before...
> How do I have to install the nvidia-glx package from backports properly?
> The instruction page [1] tells me to use apt-get -t squeeze-backports 
> install "package" and not use pinning. Actually I don't know much about 
> pinning too. On the AptPreferences debian wiki page [2] they say:
> "Before you consider 'pinning', you might want to check if the package 
> you want has been backported to your release". So I suppose I don't have 
> to use pinning at all?

No, pinning is not necessary.
 
> But when I try to install the nvidia-glx package from the backports repos 
> I get this:
> http://pastebin.com/dbiAbndp
> 
> apt-get -t squeeze-backports install nvidia-glx tells me: 
> nvidia-glx is already the newest version.
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 42 not upgraded.
> 
> But dist-upgrade won't do anything.

That looks like you don't have a source for backports, but the install 
command should have generated an error... I think.

Could you please post the output of 'apt-cache policy'? For comparison, 
here is how my 'apt-cache policy nvidia-glx' looks like (with nvidia-glx 
from backports already installed):

nvidia-glx:
  Installed: 280.13.really.275.36-1~bpo60+1
  Candidate: 280.13.really.275.36-1~bpo60+1
  Version table:
 *** 280.13.really.275.36-1~bpo60+1 0
        100 http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/ 
squeeze-backports/non-free i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     195.36.31-6 0
        990 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/non-free i386 Packages

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to