Re: Sparc Ultra5 (170)

1999-05-13 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 07:36:10PM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 1999, Ben Collins wrote: > > > The current sparc port runs on UltraSPARC's. That's not to say that it > > is a 64bit user space. It is only a 32 bit user space, but runs none > > the less. This is the same as the curren

Re: Sparc Ultra5 (170)

1999-05-13 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 06:20:16PM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 1999, Collins M. Ben wrote: > > > > > That is incorrect, slink supports UltraSPARC, and as does potato. > > > > That is odd, I was told that there was only a SPARC port and that an > UltraSPARC (64-bit) port was in it

Re: Sparc Ultra5 (170)

1999-05-12 Thread Collins M. Ben
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:03:18AM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 1999, Ian Keith Setford wrote: > > > Can anybody clear this up? I have been using Debian on Intel for almost > > three years and I'd like to put Debian on this box if at all possible. > > Last I heard, Debian does not

Re: Sparc Ultra5 (170)

1999-05-12 Thread Collins M. Ben
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 07:42:09AM -0500, Ian Keith Setford wrote: > > I posted this question to the Sparc list but didn't get a reply so I'm > trying it here. > > I have an Ultra5 that I would like to install on. The installation pages > make no mention of this, or any other machine being "supp

Sparc Ultra5 (170)

1999-05-12 Thread Ian Keith Setford
I posted this question to the Sparc list but didn't get a reply so I'm trying it here. I have an Ultra5 that I would like to install on. The installation pages make no mention of this, or any other machine being "supported". I am curious because the RedHat installation manual specifically states