"Russell S." writes:
> Chris Green writes:
>
>> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>> >
>>> > [...]
>>> >
>>> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
>>>
Chris Green writes:
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
>> > > mailing lists and various email
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:44:56AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
> > > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:44:56AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
> > > mailing lists and vari
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> I've never seen the Usenet equivalents documented anywhere. Do you
> know what they are? Maybe something like comp.debian or
> comp.linux.debian?
As an example, on news.gmane.io this debian-user list is
gmane.linux.debian.user. If there's mirroring to general Usenet, I d
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
> > mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect
> > protocols to cross pollinate?
>
>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:39:33AM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
[...]
> That doesn't make sense. Usenet and NNTP is a different protocol than
> mailing lists and various email protocols. Why would you expect
> protocols to cross pollinate?
Gateways. They live between protocols. In the concrete c
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:27 PM Russell S. wrote:
>
> David Wright writes:
>
> > On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote:
> >> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
> >> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
> >> un
David Wright writes:
> On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote:
>> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
>> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
>> until one finally went through and that would be it.
>>
>> So, a
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 04:45:26PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote:
> > I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
> > were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
> > until one finally went
On 7/2/25 05:20, Russell Stinnett wrote:
So, again, I apologize for the spam. I don't know of another way to test
it.
Stop it, or you will go blind...
..
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
(UTC+0800)
..
On Thu 06 Feb 2025 at 21:20:18 (+), Russell Stinnett wrote:
> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
> until one finally went through and that would be it.
>
> So, again, I apologize for the spam
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 09:20:18PM +, Russell Stinnett wrote:
> I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
> were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
> until one finally went through and that would be it.
>
Hi Russell,
Maybe that's lesson #
I didn't realize that the posts would be so delayed, or that they
were going through at all. I hoped that they would just outright fail
until one finally went through and that would be it.
So, again, I apologize for the spam. I don't know of another way to test
it.
--
Thanks,
Russell S.
On 2024-04-18 at 11:15, Hans wrote:
> Sorry, the spam tag appears because of DCIM in the header.
>
> Not my fault.
But it did not appear on *this* message from you to the list.
Is there a reason you couldn't edit the Subject: lines of the replies
you're sending, before you s
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2024, 17:08:53 CEST schrieb Hans:
Sorry, the spam tag appears because of DCIM in the header.
Not my fault.
Best
Hans
> Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2024, 11:53:38 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> this is by debian servers, I talked about this
inted out to me, the OP wasn't hede. It was hw. Sorry for the
> mis-attribution.
>
> Cheers
What I was saying is something like that the number of failures out of some
number of disks doesn't show the numbers of storage space failing (or however
you want to call it).
For exam
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 07:22:19PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> I think what hede was hinting at was that early SSDs had a (pretty)
> limited number of write cycles [...]
As was pointed out to me, the OP wasn't hede. It was hw. Sorry for the
mis-attribution.
C
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:31:02PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
>
> Good afternoon.
> Thank You
>
> We dont use WIFI.
>
> Desktops
>
> We do
> connect with cable to the WWW.
> Also mouse and keyboard is with cable.
>
OK: in many ways that makes it easier. I would still suggest the firmwa
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:32:23 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> Firmware is executable code that runs inside of a device (such as a
> network interface) rather than in your CPU.
>
> Many modern devices require some non-free firmware in order to perform
> their duties correctly. This is *especial
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:41:07PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> What does mean
>
> firmware is free
> firmware is not free?
Firmware can be free OR non-free.
Firmware for wireless interfaces is ALMOST ALWAYS non-free, because of
proprietary secrets that the wireless chip manufacturer is f
: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE
cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 07:18:48PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 17:24:29 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM
---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE
cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry
Am Montag, 25. April 2022, 12:58:48 CEST schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
Best version, if you do not want to have administration work, would be
Debian-11 (which is bullseye). You should choose "s
: Debian LXDE
cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:27:39PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> What is firmware?
> Do I need it?
> Is it dangerous?
Firmware is executable code that runs inside of a device (such as a
network interface) rathe
: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE
cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry
Hello Sophie,
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Good afternoon.
> >
> > Thank You.
> >
> > We do backup eve
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:27:39PM +, Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> What is firmware?
> Do I need it?
> Is it dangerous?
Firmware is executable code that runs inside of a device (such as a
network interface) rather than in your CPU.
Many modern devices require some non-free firmware in order t
LXDE
cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> > Hello Sophie,
> > >
> > >
> > > > _
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 07:18:48PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 17:24:29 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Sophie,
> > > > >
> > > >
On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 17:24:29 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Sophie,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> > Hello Sophie,
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Good afternoon.
> > > >
> > > > Thank You.
> > > >
> > > > We do backup ev
On Mon 25 Apr 2022 at 16:59:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Hello Sophie,
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Good afternoon.
> > >
> > > Thank You.
> > >
> > > We do backup every evening.
> > >
> > > What version of Debian from Debian URL is the best do d
Hello Sophie,
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Good afternoon.
> >
> > Thank You.
> >
> > We do backup every evening.
> >
> > What version of Debian from Debian URL is the best do download and burn on
> > CD?
> >
We still don't know what the actual computer you use is
Am Montag, 25. April 2022, 12:58:48 CEST schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
Best version, if you do not want to have administration work, would be
Debian-11 (which is bullseye). You should choose "stable", which is well
tested and does not have much changes in the future.
Of course you will chose the
09:55
An: Schwibinger Michael
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linux...Problem: Debian LXDE
cannot boot.. Is it destroyed?//Second try Hotmail bug Sorry
Am Montag, 25. April 2022, 11:35:38 CEST schrieben Sie:
If you have no important data, a fresh installation will do the best.
Do
at all.
Maybe you should spend some money and pay someone to fix your system, who
offers such as a commercial service.
We can try on, but I think, only looking from the far, at the end we will
loose.
Sorry for that!
Best regards
Hans
Von: Hans
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 7:54 AM 황병희
wrote:
> Dear Brad,
>
> On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > [...snip...]
> >>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
> >
> > Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's
> > guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial.
Dear Brad,
On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Brad Rogers wrote:
> [...snip...]
>>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
>
> Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's
> guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial. Thus making it
> unlikely they're the same person.
Ah ye
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:58:07 +0900
황병희 wrote:
Hello 황병희,
>Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
Debian's Brian appears to have the middle initial A, whereas Queen's
guitarist has H (for Harold) as his middle initial. Thus making it
unlikely they're the same person.
--
Regards _
Hello i'm Queen's fan, however i did discover [Brian May] in lists of
Maintainers file [1], when i sent mail to requ...@bugs.debian.org with
"getinfo maintainers" in body.
Who is it? Really is him Queen's guitarist?!
Sincerely, Byung-Hee from South Korea.
[1] https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/stuff/ra
In Article ,
Ben Caradoc-Davies writes:
> On 21/10/17 19:49, arne wrote:
>>> I am in a desperate situation, thanks!
>> https://paste.debian.net/ does not work at the moment either :(
>> I am out of luck
>
> You can upload to your Google Drive, share the link (this turns on
> link sharing, anyon
Curt wrote:
> The future is now, I guess; we've been enlisted as (un)knowing slaves by
> our digital machines. The real catch is that it is the same for whatever
> we do on the global network; it's all being harvested, digested,
> utilized; soon they will know us so much better than we know them,
On 2017-10-21, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> A car is a small passenger vehicle. A van is not a car, a truck is not a
> car. I'm not entirely sure if an SUV is a car and Utes are just... well,
> thankfully I've not had to decide about one of them in a Captcha yet.
A pipe isn't even a pipe (ceci n'est p
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 19:47:38 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
Hello Darac,
>A car is a small passenger vehicle. A van is not a car, a truck is not a
>car. I'm not entirely sure if an SUV is a car and Utes are just... well,
And there's the problem, at least in part; Ute is Australian in origin
(AIUI),
On 21/10/17 19:49, arne wrote:
I am in a desperate situation, thanks!
https://paste.debian.net/ does not work at the moment either :(
I am out of luck
You can upload to your Google Drive, share the link (this turns on link
sharing, anyone with the link can view by default), and paste the lin
On 21/10/17 18:07, arne wrote:
I am not a robot.
I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sign.
I tire of car and street sign CAPTCHAs. My favourites:
KittenAuth:
https://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2006/04/6554-2/
http://origin.arstechnica.com/staff.media/kittencaptcha.jpg
Labradood
On 21/10/17 12:20, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:58:41 + (UTC)
> Curt wrote:
>
> Hello Curt,
>
>> whether a section containing part of the support (pole or whatever) for
>> the sign constitutes something I should click on or not; then, after
> The pole doesn't count as part of th
On 2017-10-21, Brad Rogers wrote:
> --Sig_/C/xj3njr+UxhCQ2w_j=VGJl
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:58:41 + (UTC)
> Curt wrote:
>
> Hello Curt,
>
>>whether a section containing part of the support (pole or wh
On Saturday 21 October 2017 07:20:57 Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:58:41 + (UTC)
> Curt wrote:
>
> Hello Curt,
>
> >whether a section containing part of the support (pole or whatever)
> > for the sign constitutes something I should click on or not; then,
> > after
>
> The pole d
On Saturday 21 October 2017 02:49:22 arne wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:35:02 +0200
>
> arne wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:15:09 -0700
> >
> > Weaver wrote:
> > > On 2017-10-21 15:12, arne wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:07:21 +0200
> > > >
> > > > arne wrote:
> > > >> I am not a ro
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:58:41 + (UTC)
Curt wrote:
Hello Curt,
>whether a section containing part of the support (pole or whatever) for
>the sign constitutes something I should click on or not; then, after
The pole doesn't count as part of the sign but sometimes there's a
rectangle that conta
arne wrote:
> It would be nice to find another one other than imgur to show a
> picture :)
http://postimages.org/ is very suitable for this purpose.
There are several other filehosters though.
On 2017-10-21, arne wrote:
> I am not a robot.
> I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sign.
I've had problems with the street sign "captcha" (?) myself, not knowing
whether a section containing part of the support (pole or whatever) for
the sign constitutes something I should click on
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:35:02 +0200
arne wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:15:09 -0700
> Weaver wrote:
>
> > On 2017-10-21 15:12, arne wrote:
> > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:07:21 +0200
> > > arne wrote:
> > >
> > >> I am not a robot.
> > >> I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sig
f under control, it's impossible to control
> the situation you're in.
>
Right now i am angry, not towards you, not in any case.
I am fed up with a bug, lasting for years. that's what my anger is
about.
Sorry to have bothered you.
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:07:21 +0200
arne wrote:
> I am not a robot.
> I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sign.
>
It would be nice to find another one other than imgur to show a
picture :)
Pain in the ass that imgur
It took me over 100 windows clicks with no result
I am not a robot.
I can see clear whether I see a car or a street sign.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:50:40 -0700
Weaver wrote:
> On 2017-10-21 14:44, arne wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 06:38:55 +0200
> > arne wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> How can I attach a big picture to the mail I need to send to
> >> explain my problem? Does an online service excist?
> >>
> >> Than
On Mon 31 Oct 2016 at 15:44:37 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:11:34PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Other convenience scripts of similar nature get their own packages and
> > put into 'contrib'.
>
> The ones you have mentioned already (b43-fwcutter, flashplugin-nonfree and
>
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:11:34PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Other convenience scripts of similar nature get their own packages and
> put into 'contrib'.
The ones you have mentioned already (b43-fwcutter, flashplugin-nonfree and
ttf-mscorefonts-installer) do nothing useful without additional, non-free
On Mon 31 Oct 2016 at 17:11:34 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:15:51PM +, Brian wrote:
>
> > Pass on the rest because packaging is not something I know much about,
> > so I'm most likely to rely on the expertise of the maintainers. The
> > changelog might give you some clue as
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:15:51PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 30 Oct 2016 at 18:24:50 +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:20:44 +
> > Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > printer-driver-hpcups and printer-driver-hpijs would be sufficient for
> > > just printin
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 07:58:19PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> IMO hplip also supports multifunction devices.
Yup. Happen to have one of those.
> If you want to use HP device only for printing ... non of this is required.
And if I do want to use an HP device for scanning I need libsan
On Sun 30 Oct 2016 at 19:58:19 +0100, deloptes wrote:
> IMO hplip also supports multifunction devices.
Correct.
> If you want to use HP device only for printing ... non of this is required.
Correct. It can, however, depend on which backend you want to send data
to the printer if you are fussy.
IMO hplip also supports multifunction devices.
If you want to use HP device only for printing ... non of this is required.
If you want to do a scanning etc it is understandable that a kind of gui has
to be provided.
It is funny to read your arguments while you are sliding into the Ric's "I
think i
On Sun 30 Oct 2016 at 18:24:50 +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:20:44 +
> Brian wrote:
> >
> > printer-driver-hpcups and printer-driver-hpijs would be sufficient for
> > just printing. That is why the packages are provided.
>
> 'Should be' does not equal 'actually
gh.
It would be a valid argument *if* one could install HPLIP without CUPS,
but currently 'hplip' depends on 'cups', so that's impossible.
> A Depends:
> would be unsuitable if you were only setting up a USB printer.
First, that logic did not stop them from forcing o
sidered so important
> that they recommend it again (CUPS has the same Recommend). Kind of
> surprised not to see it as Depends.
CUPS was installed without its Recommends: because you do not want to
discover Bonjour broadcasted print queues. Later, HPLIP was installed
and you want to discover B
Reco wrote:
> 1) Python as a dependency, again. Wait, haven't we install one already
> with 'hplip-data'? Some python modules too, yet the package does not
> contain a single python script (see pt 6).
IMO python should be banned from real development.
I dislike the new KDE most of all because the
Hi.
On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:36:27 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Sat 29 Oct 2016 at 21:51:48 +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 19:54:27 +0200
> > deloptes wrote:
> >
> > > Reco wrote:
> > >
> > > > So basically you're proposing to force the user to install GTK3 (w
On Mon 02 May 2016 at 08:44:53 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
> > the bit bucket [...]
>
> I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejec
On 05/01/2016 11:44 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
[...]
That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
the bit bucket [...]
I doubt that part. Especially having already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
[...]
> That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into
> the bit bucket [...]
I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejects from
some Debian list due to
On 05/01/2016 10:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote:
Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit
on the site restrictions.
Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are
asked, you would get more help
On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 09:59 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> I need to re-read Gene Haskett's suggestion again and try to
> impliment
> it. Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a
> bit
> on the site restrictions.
You could probably file a bug about reject notices.
As for the
On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote:
> Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit
> on the site restrictions.
Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are
asked, you would get more help faster.
Lisi
On 05/01/2016 04:46 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
anything other than plain text files.
I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and
On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote:
> > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send
> > anything other than plain text files.
>
> I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and it has not arrived, but
> another
On Friday 22 January 2016 13:23:25 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 22 January 2016 11:49:15 Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 22 Jan 2016 at 20:55:05 +1000, Weaver wrote:
> > > Am receiving this on 'aptitude update'.
> > > ~~
> > > root@Telaman:/home/weaver# aptitude update
> > > Hit http://ftp
Shouldn't rush. My typing is lousy. Herewith again:
> On Friday 06 March 2015 23:15:12 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 06 March 2015 15:22:21 Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > Somehow, anything that needs daily updates, or upgrades, does not meet
> > > any definition of "stable" that I'm familiar w
Hi all,
Five minutes ago I posted a mean, personal attack. Nobody needs that,
especially these days. So I just procmailed that particular person
to /dev/null, so I won't see his messages and respond to him.
I apologize to the list and the person I personally attacked.
SteveT
Steve Litt
Hello Everyone,
I have to admin I use very bad language. I'm sorry, it wasn't
appropriate. You are absolutely right.
The links that I've shared, aren't mine. I've just found them.
The only reason that I wanted to reach, make the system(s) better if we
don't
On 20131209_181204, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:14:19PM -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > On 20131209_134124, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > I don't know if xfce has any impact on the
> > > execution of ~/.profile at login. Have you tried to run your scripts
> > > or looking at the ou
El Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:41:28 +
Clive Standbridge escribió:
> > If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to
> > put libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist.
> > Obviously I can
> > create it, but I need to know where to put it.
> >
> > Iceweasel 10.0.10,
> If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
> libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I
> can
> create it, but I need to know where to put it.
>
> Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze.
Hi Lisi,
Instead of setting it up manually, you can i
On Saturday 03 November 2012 21:43:55 Greg Madden wrote:
> On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:47:53 you wrote:
> > If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
> > libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I
> > can create it, but I need to know where
On Saturday 03 November 2012 12:47:53 you wrote:
> If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
> libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I
> can create it, but I need to know where to put it.
>
> Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze.
>
> Thanks,
>
On Saturday 03 November 2012 22:25:18 b.g. white wrote:
> Made the assumption of you using Firefox/Iceweasel, etc.
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:23 PM, b.g. white wrote:
> > /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
Thank you! :-)
Lisi
> > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> If there were a p
Made the assumption of you using Firefox/Iceweasel, etc.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:23 PM, b.g. white wrote:
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>> If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
>> libflashplayer.so in it,
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
> libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can
> create it, but I need to know where to put it.
>
> Iceweasel 10.0.10, L
If there were a plugins directory, where would it be? I need to put
libflashplayer.so in it, and it currently doesn't exist. Obviously I can
create it, but I need to know where to put it.
Iceweasel 10.0.10, LXDE and Squeeze.
Thanks,
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@li
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 01:15:28 + (UTC)
Mark Fletcher wrote:
...
> compatibility. I have heard of people wresting their NAS out of the grasp of
> the OS it comes with and installing Linux on it, presumably by mucking about
> with firmware etc, but I have never attempted to do any such thing a
On 31/07/12 13:15, Mark Fletcher wrote:
Paul -- The NAS is a Buffalo LinkStation 4TB NAS configured to do RAID giving
me 2TB of storage. I bought myself it for Christmas from Amazon.co.jp (I live
in Japan) at Christmas 2010. I don't know what OS it will be running but doubt
it will be Linux since
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh debian.org> writes:
>
> Well... there is an awlful lot of CIFS and NFS-related fixes in the kernel
> stable queue. Check that. Also make sure it is not your NIC driver or
> memory (or the NAS' memory) that went bad...
>
I wondered about this too -- and the defecti
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Paul E Condon mesanetworks.net> writes:
> > Having posted this, which I thought was reasonable, I went and looked at
> > the
> > archives to see what OP (Mark Fletcher) had written. It turns out that all
> > of his investigation was done using commands
Paul E Condon mesanetworks.net> writes:
>
> Having posted this, which I thought was reasonable, I went and looked at the
> archives to see what OP (Mark Fletcher) had written. It turns out that all
> of his investigation was done using commands typed in as root. For me, this
> thread is a real
On 30/07/12 04:09 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20120730_122543, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20120730_065640, Mark Fletcher wrote:
Joe jretrading.com> writes:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 01:50:14 +0900
Mark Fletcher gmail.com> wrote:
It looks like what got stored on the NAS is not exactly what was
or
On 20120730_122543, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20120730_065640, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > Joe jretrading.com> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 01:50:14 +0900
> > > Mark Fletcher gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > It looks like what got stored on the NAS is not exactly what was
>
Sorry was suppose to reply all :)
RE: Nvidia drivers problem Geforce 570, Have not used this model GPU, sorry.
What model are you using?
I also have a 5xxx series and a 8800GTX and 8800GT to swap out and see, i just
haven't tried that yet
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:19:49 -0400
From: sa
On 06/07/2012 08:11 PM, Nathan D'elboux wrote:
Hello everyone!
I wanted to know has anyone had any issues getting nvidia drivers
working for a Geforce 5xx series card under Debian 6 squeeze?
I'm running a Geforce 570 running a Dell 27" IPS screen that has a res
of 2560 x 1440, the res isn't
1 - 100 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
