On Ma, 06 mai 14, 21:20:29, Brian wrote:
>
> The Debian Fairy has waved her magic wand:
>
>tasksel remove
>
> Followed by
>
>apt-get --purge autoremove
This will most probably not restore your system to its previous state
due to circular Depends/Recommends/Suggests, especially for th
On Ma, 06 mai 14, 17:33:56, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 07:54 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > I want a new "task-jwm-desktop" to be written.
>
> It might make sense to provide xfce4-terminal or roxterm for such a
> JWM meta-package, but many people perhaps think tha
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:20:29PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 06 May 2014 at 07:54:58 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> > This post is being composed well after a great tree of responses to OP
> > have accumulated. In these, as well as in other posts about DE in
> > Debian I have seen mentioned th
On Tue 06 May 2014 at 07:54:58 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> This post is being composed well after a great tree of responses to OP
> have accumulated. In these, as well as in other posts about DE in
> Debian I have seen mentioned the JWM environment. It is interesting to
> me, but I am aware that
On 20140506_1820+0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 17:56 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > I don't want to decide what "sane" default software for JWM usage could
> > be. Some people want to get something close to a bloated DE, other's
> > want to be closer to a tiling window manager w
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 17:56 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I don't want to decide what "sane" default software for JWM usage could
> be. Some people want to get something close to a bloated DE, other's
> want to be closer to a tiling window manager when using JWM.
PPS: I want to get something in the
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 17:33 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 07:54 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > I want a new "task-jwm-desktop" to be written.
>
> JWM isn't a desktop environment, it's a window manager only. To provide
> such a meta package for JWM would be more
Hi Paul,
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 07:54 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I want a new "task-jwm-desktop" to be written.
JWM isn't a desktop environment, it's a window manager only. To provide
such a meta package for JWM would be more controversy, than it already
is for Xfce. For example, Xfce has got i
On 20140502_1155+0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 02 mai 14, 15:58:00, Bret Busby wrote:
> >
> > What I am wondering, is whether the Debian 7.5 installation disks, include
> > the option during the installation process, for the user to select which
> > desktop environment(s) the user wants to
I guessing my eth card is dead but hoping ;). Sony's support team are
useless and incompetent so I don't bother (tried to contact them on
other problems but they were never able to give anything else then the
template answear).
My eth card stop functioning. Its a realtech 8139 compatible onboard
c
Has anyone managed to make a deb package out of the Xi Graphics X
server? We bought it cos it has multiheaded support, and before I beat
my head against the wall for too long I thought perhaps someone else had
luck with this software ...
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux
Hi,
Actually, in the Open Source book by O' Reilly, Linus himself
answers this question : all other variants of UNIX were actually derived
from the AT&T and (eventually) BSD source code. Linux was written from
scratch and is not based off of the AT&T or BSD sources. So Linux is
really a UN
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote:
> > Mark Wright writes:
> > > Did someone register FreeBSD? If you check out FreeBSD.org, they say
> > > "FreeBSD is an advanced BSD UNIX operating system".
> >
> > They don't need anyone's permission to call FreeBSD UNIX. They aren't
> > selling it
I wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
> > Mark Wright writes:
> > > Did someone register FreeBSD? If you check out FreeBSD.org, they say
> > > "FreeBSD is an advanced BSD UNIX operating system".
> >
> > They don't need anyone's permission to call FreeBSD UNIX. They aren't
> > selling it.
>
> I don't th
> Mark Wright writes:
> > Did someone register FreeBSD? If you check out FreeBSD.org, they say
> > "FreeBSD is an advanced BSD UNIX operating system".
>
> They don't need anyone's permission to call FreeBSD UNIX. They aren't
> selling it.
I don't think that's anything to do with it. BSD UNIX *i
Mark Wright writes:
> Did someone register FreeBSD? If you check out FreeBSD.org, they say
> "FreeBSD is an advanced BSD UNIX operating system".
They don't need anyone's permission to call FreeBSD UNIX. They aren't
selling it.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
From: Ted Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|On 08-Jun-99 Mark Wright wrote:
|> I've checked the FAQs, and I can't seem to find a good answer to this:
|> why is Linux not refered to as a flavor of Unix? On Linux.Org, it's
|> referred to as "Unix-like", and this hedging seems pretty universal.
|> Is th
On 08-Jun-99 Mark Wright wrote:
> I've checked the FAQs, and I can't seem to find a good answer to this:
> why is Linux not refered to as a flavor of Unix? On Linux.Org, it's
> referred to as "Unix-like", and this hedging seems pretty universal.
> Is there some Unix standard that Linux does not
>
> I've checked the FAQs, and I can't seem to find a good answer to this: why
> is Linux not refered to as a flavor of Unix? On Linux.Org, it's referred to
> as "Unix-like", and this hedging seems pretty universal. Is there some
> Unix standard that Linux does not adhere to. Is there some lic
I've checked the FAQs, and I can't seem to find a good answer to this: why
is Linux not refered to as a flavor of Unix? On Linux.Org, it's referred to
as "Unix-like", and this hedging seems pretty universal. Is there some
Unix standard that Linux does not adhere to. Is there some licensing
orga
On Sun, 25 Jan 1998, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
> "DAVID B. TEAGUE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ... Is there a way to program the ppp chat script or
> > otherwise programm a dial loop that will allow me to repeatedly try to
> > connect and start ppp?
> My pppd tries repeatedly (at least
On Sun, 25 Jan 1998, DAVID B. TEAGUE wrote:
> Hi
>
> My ISP one of the *.campus.mci.net ISPs. They claim only to support
> Windoze and refuse to help when I have problems, since I don't use the
> M$ os.
>
> When things work they work very, very well. I have had about a year of
> consecutive da
"DAVID B. TEAGUE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sometimes 20 - 30 attempts with pppd will get a connection. Using
> kermit, I can program a loop to retry until it conects. I can't start
> ppp that way. Is there a way to program the ppp chat script or
> otherwise programm a dial loop that will al
> Sometimes 20 - 30 attempts with pppd will get a connection. Using
> kermit, I can program a loop to retry until it conects. I can't start
> ppp that way. Is there a way to program the ppp chat script or
> otherwise programm a dial loop that will allow me to repeatedly try to
> connect and star
Hi
My ISP one of the *.campus.mci.net ISPs. They claim only to support
Windoze and refuse to help when I have problems, since I don't use the
M$ os.
When things work they work very, very well. I have had about a year of
consecutive days of connecting the first try any time I try, with only
an oc
I just found out about this javascript bug that affects both IE and NS.
They say it works on all versions on NS (linux/unix/windows/mac) I have
checked it on the mac.. and it does work there.
Will check the linux version once I get home tonight. Unless someone
beats me to it. This is more a sec
26 matches
Mail list logo
